Why is Trump covering up the Epstein files while protecting pedophiles?

Bill Barr, under oath, said Trump is clean. Sorry libs! Another swing and a miss on their latest smear of Trump.

Bill Barr testifies he didn't see info that would 'implicate' Trump in Epstein case, Comer says
Ex-Attorney General Barr is testifying behind closed doors to the House Oversight Committee
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bi...would-implicate-trump-epstein-case-comer-says

Former Attorney General Bill Barr told House investigators on Monday that he never saw anything that could tie President Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein's sordid crimes, Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., said.

"He said that he had never seen anything that would implicate President Trump in any of this, and that he believed if there had been anything pertaining to President Trump with respect to the Epstein list, that he felt like the Biden administration would probably have leaked it out," Comer told reporters partway through Barr's testimony.

 

Well I guess that closes the case.

Trump is a pedo dude.

 

No matter what other bullshit Trump tries, the Epstein files will still be hanging over his head.

 

He just did it again, let the dude flee the country.

you can’t make this **** up, and people wonder how someone Eps got away for so long.

 

Can someone please explain why Maxwell who is a Pedophile was moved to Club Fed..................No one at the WH seems to know who authorized this.

Where's all the folks who told us for years the magic epstein files would be released and those dam libs will pay for it..................Distract Distract Distract

 

https://www.npr.org/2022/08/20/1118625157/doj-barr-trump-russia-investigation-memo

the same Bill Barr that, as Trump's AG, had made "misleading public statements" to spin the investigation's findings in favor of Trump and had shown a "lack of candor.", including improperly withhelding portions of an internal memo

 

1. She was moved from a low security to a minimum security prison -- basically the same thing.

2. An Obama judge and now this week a Clinton-appointed judge both blocked the release of the Epstein grand jury testimony. Correct, Democrat-sympathetic judges do not want this information released... so they can keep the innuendo going in the absence of any dirt on Trump. Many have said there's no "there there"... as it relates to implicating Trump. And who in their right mind would believe that Democrats would have sat through three Trump Presidential elections and NOT leaked anything damaging. This is Russian collusion Part II. Lots of accusations and innuendo... no facts.


GOOD DAY

 

latest eg of Traitor George parroting a convenient false narrative, a misdirection

in Feb 2025, in an interview on FoxNews on TV,

Trump 2.0's AG, Pam Bondi, says Epstein client list
'sitting on my desk right now,'​

then Pam Bondi pack-pedaled---diverting attention away from the Espstein clinet list sitting on her desk---
proceeded to request the Federal court to release grand jury testimony regarding the Epstein trial.

Judge denies White House request to unseal Epstein jury documents . adding that

"The information contained in the Epstein grand jury transcripts pales in comparison to the Epstein investigation information and
materials in the hands of the Department of Justice,"

The federal government was the "logical party" that's responsibility was to "make comprehensive disclosure to the public"
of the Epstein files.

"By comparison, the instant grand jury motion appears to be a 'diversion' from the breadth and scope of the Epstein files
in the government's possession," the judge wrote.​

 

related

h/t @basso

 

I think one simple solution for Cracker Barrel is to improve the quality of food. Maybe try less Sysco? And really, the name itself is not so great and probably more of an issue than the logo.

Also, any meal would taste better if the Epstein files were released.

 

Old conservative men love them some blonde butterfaces.

 

"conventionally pretty."

 

How bad must the Epstein documents be for Trump that he would rather feed the innuendo and be called a liar by his own MAGA base?

Perhaps there are actual tapes of him diddling minors? Or is it him crossing swords with Epstein? Or both?

 

Those close to the information have testified under oath that Trump had no involvement. Sorry. Evidence matters.


GOOD DAY

 

Aw, is that the best you have? The word of compulsive liars?

The publicly available information belies that. Photos are evidence.

Hmm, are the Epstein files not evidence? Or do they not exist. I can’t keep it straight.

Your boy diddled minors and he’s scared. You just mad because you support a pedo.

 

LOL, photos of criminal activity? Nope. Nice try!

We've been down the path of guilt by association and innuendo before -- the Russian collusion hoax. 9+ years of lying by Democrats about it. Not again. Evidence or sit down. And you lack evidence. I presented evidence -- from the testimony of Virginia Giuffre and Bill Barr. Barr is no fan of Trump. You have nothing but the "wishful thinking" that Trump was guilty because he and Epstein were both in Palm Beach and NYC together. That's not a crime. Trump was never on the Lolita Express to Epstein Island -- the flight logs prove that. You simply have no evidence, and therefore your accusation is without merit.

I'd encourage you to find a new outlet to cope.


GOOD DAY

 

Aw, I can’t think of one compelling reason not to release the Epstein files. The files that Trump screamed would be released. The files that MAGA demanded to be released. The files that Bondi has in her office.

Wait, no, I can think of one reason. There’s evidence that Trump diddled boys.