1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Choose your own adventure: Which star should the Rockets acquire, or none of them?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by OremLK, May 19, 2025.

?

Which move do you make?

  1. Acquire Giannis Antetokounmpo, give Milwaukee a massive trade return.

    22 vote(s)
    11.6%
  2. Acquire Jaylen Brown, give Boston a significant trade return.

    7 vote(s)
    3.7%
  3. Acquire Devin Booker, give Phoenix a significant trade return.

    27 vote(s)
    14.2%
  4. Acquire Ja Morant, give Memphis a significant trade return.

    5 vote(s)
    2.6%
  5. Acquire LaMelo Ball, give Charlotte a significant trade return.

    9 vote(s)
    4.7%
  6. Acquire Trae Young, give Atlanta a significant trade return.

    9 vote(s)
    4.7%
  7. Acquire Kevin Durant, give Phoenix a moderate trade return.

    39 vote(s)
    20.5%
  8. Acquire Zach LaVine, give Sacramento a minimal trade return.

    15 vote(s)
    7.9%
  9. Acquire nobody, or only make small moves. Run it back.

    57 vote(s)
    30.0%
  1. Furious Jam

    Furious Jam Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2002
    Messages:
    2,892
    Likes Received:
    1,576
    There is no run-it-back option. You already have Cam and Reed (the #3 pick!) rotting on the bench for a whole season. Now you'll have Bari & Tari fighting for backup minutes at the same position in a contract year. And of course you still have Jalen Green, who is 2 years away from free agency and will still need all of his shots. To this you add the #10 pick who will play... never?

    It's a mistake to assume that progress will be linear and infinite. It's also a mistake to assume that these are just a bunch of kids who will accept whatever roles they're given in exchange for orange slices, a pizza party, and tiny plastic trophies. The NBA is a business and these are businessmen who need to be part of a long-term plan as opposed to Uber drivers that Ime can call on whenever. A consolidation move and a direction are needed.
     
    MettaWorldPete likes this.
  2. Rokman

    Rokman Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    6,092
    Likes Received:
    7,139
    Aquire Nic Claxton and Dyson Daniels and give up Jalen Green, Jock Landale, Jae'Sean Tate, #10 pick.

    PG - FVV / Sheppard
    SG - Daniels / Brooks / Whitmore
    SF - Thompson / Eason
    PF - Sengun / Smith Jr
    ..C - Claxton / Adams

    Top defense in the league with a lob threat and most importantly, no more Jalen.
     
  3. gfab-babyboi

    gfab-babyboi Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2005
    Messages:
    7,403
    Likes Received:
    6,849
    because people are hypocrites - they say oh give us Booker cause they feel JG will be involved but they say Giannis too old cause they feel Alpi will be involved

    So they willing to pass on a Top 3 player, yearly MVP candidate that just put up 30/**/* in the playoffs cause he’s 30 but go after a older version of our player who shot worse from 3 than him last year and didn’t make playoffs with KD and Beal
     
    leebigez likes this.
  4. RHU525

    RHU525 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2002
    Messages:
    5,711
    Likes Received:
    8,012
    Maybe cuz they lost by 45 in playoffs? Got swept and their star is crazy? I don't see Memphis running it back. They need to rebuild around Ja maybe they want Jalen. Why is Ja an option in this post? Probably easier to get the other guys than him.
     
  5. Hemingway

    Hemingway Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2016
    Messages:
    10,596
    Likes Received:
    13,810
    Very good post and absolutely correct. Running it back and drafting a rookie that is probably 2 years away from seeing the court is insane. This team has a core of Amen, Sengun (who also could be traded for a great package), and Jabari. It needs to be re-balanced. You cannot when a championship or even compete for one with a horrible offense.
     
    MettaWorldPete and htownrox1 like this.
  6. htownrox1

    htownrox1 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Messages:
    8,238
    Likes Received:
    6,298
    I agree with those against running it back.

    We’re not good enough as constructed to win it all. So if you stand pat then you’re saying you’re okay not making a big move to be a true contender…

    You have to at least TRY and swing a trade for Giannis, KD, Booker, or Ja. We have enough assets to land one of these and still have picks left over to keep building after one of the superstars we were to get, slows down.

    I think the front office knows this, but it takes two to tango.

    I love Sengun and he’s easy to root for, unfortunately a lot of our fan base has him as the next Joker or top 15 player. I just don’t see that happening. If you can get a superstar for him then you do that 10 times out of 10.
     
    Hemingway likes this.
  7. chef0010

    chef0010 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2012
    Messages:
    539
    Likes Received:
    366
    Devin booker is already old - he might even be aging worse than Durant
     
  8. Thrilla

    Thrilla Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    1,552
    Likes Received:
    2,409
    Not sure how you came up with the above. Durant has aged amazingly. Producing at a star level at the age of 37. The only player who has aged BETTER than KD is LeBron. However, maybe you meant he is too old then yeah, I would agree. How can you tell Booker is aging poorly? He did have a down-year. Does not mean he is aging poorly.
     
  9. Hemingway

    Hemingway Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2016
    Messages:
    10,596
    Likes Received:
    13,810
    Durant is still playing at a high level. His age is obviously a factor, but he is still a difference maker. Acquiring Durant is just a risk/reward exercise. I don’t think there is any doubt that having Durant would improve our team as long as he stays healthy. The risk is twofold, health and cost. I, for one, think a two year gamble on Durant is worth 1 of the Phoenix picks, FVV, and Cam or Tari. Whether Phoenix can get a better package or Stone thinks that is too high of a price is certainly up in the air.
     
  10. OremLK

    OremLK Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    20,070
    Likes Received:
    17,675
    The minutes are there for Reed, he just has to reach out and take them. This backcourt is thin and relatively weak. It's pretty clear Cam is going to get traded, I'd be a bit surprised if he's still a Rocket in October.

    I'm a little more concerned about how Tari and Jabari are going to fare coming off the bench as guys clearly talented enough to start for a number of teams. I definitely wouldn't mind seeing a consolidation trade--I know people love Tari and don't want to lose him, but you do have a point about how these guys probably aren't going to stay happy with lesser roles, and I think Jabari is pretty clearly the better fit on this roster.
     
  11. napalm06

    napalm06 Huge Flopping Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    26,910
    Likes Received:
    30,511
    You're really underselling the incompetence and erraticness of the offense we saw for 7 games. No player led the Rockets to where they ended up, a committee and a system did. That's exactly why you do a trade for a cold blooded scorer.
     
    Dobbizzle likes this.
  12. Hemingway

    Hemingway Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2016
    Messages:
    10,596
    Likes Received:
    13,810
    What is the scenario that Jabari AND Tari are coming off the bench? Jabari is our starting PF, period. He provides everything we need from the position and would provide more if Ime wasn’t such a poor offensive coach. If you get Durant, you must be suggesting that Amen has to be your PF because FVV is still starting. Any coach that is starting FVV over Amen or Jabari needs to be fired. It is the absolute definition of idiocy.
     
  13. OremLK

    OremLK Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    20,070
    Likes Received:
    17,675
    I think Jabari should be starting, but the lineup Ime was running out there at the end of the season and through the playoffs was FVV/Jalen/Dillon/Amen/Sengun. Not really a fan of that group starting games or being on the floor together so often, but I'm not going to be surprised if he stubbornly keeps the same setup.

    If it were up to me? I'd go Amen/FVV/Dillon/Jabari/Sengun or Amen/Jalen/Dillon/Jabari/Sengun, assuming we more or less run it back. Either of those two is fine, as long as the two highest-usage players end up being Amen and Sengun. (Which is the other issue, we gotta stop running things through Fred and Jalen so much.)

    We'll see.
     
  14. yixiixiy

    yixiixiy Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    2,940
    Likes Received:
    5,167
    Probably an unpopular opinion knowing how this board works but Mitchell has to be out there
     
  15. OremLK

    OremLK Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    20,070
    Likes Received:
    17,675
    I've been going through this whole season assuming there's no chance he would be available, but after that insanely disappointing playoff run they had you never know I guess.
     
  16. Hemingway

    Hemingway Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2016
    Messages:
    10,596
    Likes Received:
    13,810
    Assuming we run it back the best we can do is Amen,Jalen, Dillon, Jabari, Sengun. Unfortunately, Ime will never bench FVV for anything other than a directive from the owner (he would laugh at Stone) or an injury. I guess we could FVV, Jalen, Amen, Jabari, Sengun. It is just insane, that anybody in basketball wants to run it back with such a putrid offense.
     
  17. Damion Laverne

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,372
    Likes Received:
    2,308
    A trade to consolidate the young talent could be on the horizon
     
  18. Thrilla

    Thrilla Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    1,552
    Likes Received:
    2,409
    @Hemingway

    I am trying to understand why people want to trade for KD. What are you hoping to accomplish - I do not think KD is nearly enough to be considered a contender, and since time is of the essence, are we Bonafide contenders within the next few years? I am not so sure. If you say, "KD bridges the gap," what exactly does this help with?

    I have never liked what I consider desperate moves, such as going all in or trading for an aging star. I would much rather get a piece that can grow with the team. The only looming issue that would force a trade early are the contract extensions for Bari and Tari. Neither will get close to the rookie max, so I tend to think this issue is a tad overstated. @aelliott Going to tag you in all issues related with the cap. Perdon Amigo.

    As far as the value of KD, we just saw the Suns pick net us the #10 pick. I only see the future Suns picks climbing towards the top of the draft. Is a future top 5 pick worth two years of KD? I do not think so. People can be too quick to throw in future picks; maybe this is because they do not have a defined value yet like this year's pick. Save these picks for a young(er) star. Unless the cap is really an issue, we have time; let's be patient for the right opportunity to hit the trade market.

    Salud.
     
    carl_herrera and OremLK like this.
  19. OremLK

    OremLK Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    20,070
    Likes Received:
    17,675
    This is pretty much where I'm at regarding KD. I don't think he puts us over the top and I don't think he will still be playing in the NBA at all when our guys are in their peak years. Just feels like a move to make a move, and I'm very concerned about the possibility of giving him an extension that turns into a terrible contract.

    If we have to make a move to get better right now at least make it a younger guy. For a similar archetype, Cam Johnson makes more sense, because even though he's not as good, he will probably be about the same player 3 years from now. Or even Lauri Markkanen--yes, his contract is awful, but less awful than, say, giving KD a three-year supermax, and he's only 27.

    But I also think the backcourt makes a lot more sense to upgrade than either forward position.
     
    SamFisher likes this.
  20. Joe Joe

    Joe Joe Go Stros!
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 1999
    Messages:
    26,275
    Likes Received:
    16,601
    Usage % Rank Playoffs (rotation players only)
    1. Sengun
    2. Amen
    3. Green
    4. Brooks
    5. Eason
    6. FVV

    Usage % Rank after 1/3/25 when Amen became a starter (rotation players only)
    1. Green
    2. Sengun
    3. Eason
    4. Brooks
    5. Amen
    6. JSJ
    7. FVV

    If the goal is to get Amen and Sengun 1, 2 in usage, FVV and Amen as the backcourt seems the logical choice, as FVV is a low usage player and Green is a high usage player.
     
    OremLK likes this.

Share This Page