DEI gone wrong: Connecticut girl who graduated SUEs education system cause she’s illiterate

... Why are you struggling to comprehend such a straight forward point... was this not something you could memorize on the SAT test prep?

All of these universities are packed with deeply left administrators who push garbage ideologies. They hire left, teach left, and normalize fabricating data to prove narrative over truth because it's their religion. Occasionally it gets caught, but the web is thick and muddled.

Professor fired for 'faking data to prove whites want longer sentences for blacks'

These institutions weren't historically liberal, but the past 15 years have seen far left activists infiltrate organizations built on conservative ideologies, overpower the common sense contingent due to sheer numbers, and aggressively attempt to dismantle them. Activist administrators hire DEI staffers with money provided by people who want a merit based society, not one obsessed with ethnicity. (U Mich paying $30m a year to DEI staffers). It's fraud, but who cares when it's for a good cause.

This trickled into the job force and you had organizations like budweiser hiring execs who didn't understand their target demo, hated their target demo, and started radicalizing everything leading to backlash and would be bankruptcy if they weren't Anheuser-Busch owned. Rice has a DEI courses based on the entire premise that managerial and leadership positions should be given to people based on ethnicity (Key Concepts in Organizational DEI | Rice University). Of course, those rules don't apply to you because you're the wrong one. The top 8 earning ethnicities in the US are not white - why aren't white people seeking to oppress those groups according to DEI?

This is what the end game is. In the case of the girl in the OP, the purple haired admins at her school were too excited over her ethnicity to realize reading and writing - ie communicating - were essential to academic education. When she asked how to do it, they told her to draw because they thought she wasn't capable. Colleges saw she checked the right box (not white) and blindly gave her a scholarship. It is the foundation of liberal racism, the notion that some minorities are too stupid and should constantly be given handouts because white people are out to get them. Leading to actual development being stunted.

 

Leftists don't care about Dei hiring standards.

Capitalist corporate shareholders and executives do.


See if you work for a living and actually held jobs and careers, did interviews, have been involved in the interview process for jobs even technical jobs like engineering you'll learn that people hire mostly based on "vibes".

See that data entry job in Excel doesn't have a one human that is "the most qualified for the job on this planet ". That doesn't exist. Most careers have some level of technical expertise but that expertise is shared amongst many at nearly the same competence level.

So these executives over time find out they hire based on "vibes" mostly. Okay you meet the technical qualifications to perform the technical duties of said job but are you a Packers fan? You like V8 Cameros? You like slamming some PBRs after work?

This is how the "big boy frat house club" becomes reality. This is why almost every corporate board room is like 70% white old dudes with similar hobbies and interests. People like hiring people who act like them and have similar "cultural values". So eventually everyone in the building has the same hobbies, same circle of friends etc.


Executives have found out this actually reduces worker productivity and makes it more likely the workers will unionize. See, a diverse workfroce means that the production floor has less "horsing around". Employees will also less likely form bonds outside of work like go out and drink where conversations can be brought up like... How shitty their employer is and how they should unionize.



Diversity increases production. Now what would all these wealthy executives and capital owners now dump DEi and throw it under the bus?

Because the average person is realizing more and more than our economy is basically a gambling racket full of wealthy people just throwing money around and doing little work while workers are basically fuel to satisfy their wealth accumulation needs. The cyclical layoffs, gutting corporations that are known for engineering prowess like GE and Boeing being turned into glorified finance companies... People are figuring that out and those capital owners don't want us normal people blaming them so they will throw something like "DEI" under the bus and Blake black women or trans people or dwarves for why our economic system is slowly collapsing.

Basically (assuming you are sincere and not a troll) you are a useful idiot for capital owners.

 

So, to be precise, it is your position that all of the colleges I listed are “liberal institutions”. I was merely seeking your opinion on that and appreciate you giving it to me.

if I may follow up, is it your position that all colleges are “liberal institutions” - like say local institutions like UH, Baylor, SMU, TCU, and colleges a little more distant, but comparable, like OU, Tulane and the like. I’m just trying to understand your world view on whether all colleges are “liberal institutions” and if not, what colleges might not be “liberal institutions”.

As to the quote from you above, so do you think UConn knew her high school grades and accolades were BS and admitted her because she was the right kind of minority? Or, did they process her application in good faith reliance on the legitimacy of the grades and were they victims of a fraudulent application?

 

do you know if she took the SAT and what her score was? Or did you pull that out of your ass? UConn is test optional so there was no requirement for her to take or submit a SAT score.

if you pretend to deal in facts, you’ll answer these questions.

 

And this right here is the difficult problem for @tinman @Salvy @strosb4bros.

Their position is that DEI is bad because (1) hiring and promotions should be based on merit, and (2) promoting minority hiring is not merit based.

The corollary is (1) hiring and promotions should be based on merit, and (2) the frat boy/sorority girl/country club based hiring and promotions are not based on merit. Corporate america is no more merit based than DEI.

The intellectually dishonest response is that (1) white people don’t run corporate America, and (2) even if they do, they don’t hire or promote based on frat boy/sorority girl/country club biases. Essentially, they live in an alternate reality.

The third option is that if corporate America does hire with white bias, well, those “cultural values” are far better than the “cultural values” of brown and black people.

 

His parents/family were from where?

 

Fact: UConn received 58,000 applicants for this woman’s entering class, and admitted roughly 19,500 students.

Question: Is it your position that a UConn admissions director had the time and inclination to investigate this 1 application out of the 58,000 and determined that her GPA and academic record were fraudulent, but decided to admit her anyway.

 

@Rileydog

Thank you for your effort in accurately depicting what this story is about.

It's a lot more interesting now that the claim of DEI has been proven false

 

You've provided insight into your life as a corporate drone. Life's got ya bitter eh? When you have to reach this far, pretending it's about blaming trans people and black women for the economy crashing, it's out of desperation. The issue is simple. Stop giving promotions and not holding people accountable due to immutable characteristics. No one is against diverse workforces, they are against intentionally promoting and looking past the incompetence of individuals based on skin color. Twitter's HQ was super diverse when it was running at a loss of $5m/month , and when all the unnecessary positions were fired, 80%, it was a bunch of Asian and white guys left over. The site is still running. That is DEI gone wild. The purple haired women who spent all day monitoring profiles for microaggressions weren't necessary for operations.

My small businesses are diverse. It's not a feature but no one is not represented outside of trans. People just aren't obsessed with this stuff in the real world. However, if an outside consultant told me I needed to make someone manager based on anything other than competence, or that I couldnt fire someone because of their gender or race, the red sirens start. And that reflects the majority of Americans. Your bitterness is causing you to turn this into a completely unrelated anti capitalist rant.

 

Are you ready to admit that UConn didn’t engage in DEI when they admitted the woman in question in this thread?

 

No problem. I happen to know a lot about college admissions practices these days because both of my kids are currently in college and went through the process recently.

This thread demonstrates two primary things: (1) DEI had no role in UConn admitting this woman, and (2) @tinman @Salvy @strosb4bros are so obsessed with DEI that they will scream DEI at basically anything involving black or brown people.

The pros and cons of DEI programs is a topic worth discussing. But these dumb asses lack the intellectual capability and intellectual honesty to do so.

 

Not even, there are no pros about hiring or accepting someone based off of their skin color. It seems like a noble thing to do, give opportunities to people who may be overlooked based off of the same exact thing but the issue is that the positions these people are filling should require qualification not skin color. Especially in certain fields where lives are at risk. I hate flying, I absolutely hate it. I don't care if the pilots are black, trans, women, gay, white or hispanic......... I just want them to get me where I'm going safe..... I am counting on airlines to hire the highest qualified personnel possible. That's it.... Its that simple.... If the companies and schools are not doing so they are cheating the people funding them with expectations of competence.

 

https://www.newsweek.com/how-did-ho...nrolled,complete schoolwork, according to CNN.


Her admission to UConn was possible due to the school's holistic application process, which does not require SAT scores. According to UConn admissions, the university evaluates applications based on GPA, coursework, extracurricular activities and essays.

Ortiz, who told CNN she used voice-to-text software to complete her application, also received financial aid and scholarships to support her education.

 

As I have explained in detail in this thread, you are full of ****. You consume garbage so you post garbage. UCONN does not require SAT scores. It is a “test optional” school. Many, if not most, colleges are test optional now and employ a the evaluation process that @pgabriel cited above. I can do this all day.

Give up yet?

@Salvy
@strosb4bros

 

This is fine. You have your opinion about DEI. I happen to agree with some of this. I also believe that white country club/frat/sorority hiring culture is a form of hiring that is not merit based, and it predominates in corporate America. As a whole, there are many problems with hiring that is not merit based, and the question is what to do about that. Not to deny that it is a massive problem.

Do you concede that DEI had nothing to do with this woman’s admission into UConn given the facts I have presented about UConns application process, the 58,000 applications received, and 19,500 people admitted?

 

This is just a general statement. UConn has commented on how she was successfully enrolled.

UConn isn't trying to hide anything from Tinman or Trumpsters

 

yup, and every college has such a web page on their website.

Is this supposed to be evidence that this woman took the SAT? Or that UConn hired a private investigator for her 1 out of
nearly 60,000 applications?

It’s not that hard Tinman. Where is your evidence that UConn knew her grades were bogus? For some who is unrelenting in his position, surely you have some evidence of that.

Even your brethren appear to be surrendering this point.