1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

De'Aaron Fox

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by ThatboyPhuong, Dec 21, 2024.

  1. Phillyrocket

    Phillyrocket Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    14,439
    Likes Received:
    11,587
    Just about every player has flaws. When you say Fox and Booker isn’t worth giving up assets and a big contract well who is? Who is this magical player that will become available in trade or FA that we are waiting on?

    Last year many argued Donovan Mitchell wasn’t worth it when those rumors were going. Obviously those people were wrong.

    Go down the list. You’re not getting Jokic, SGA, Doncic, Tatum, etc. The only players arguably better than Booker or Fox that might, and that’s a big maybe, might eventually become available, is LaMelo Ball and ANT.

    So is that the master plan? Keep the core together until one of those two maybe, possibly, potentially, demands a trade??
     
    ElPigto, Boii, pm713 and 1 other person like this.
  2. astrosrule

    astrosrule Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,704
    Likes Received:
    7,603
    You never know. Decent chance ant will want out, decent chance sga won’t be in okc forever. Jokic could easily get sick of his awful ownership/FO. If we lose our assets for fox and pay him, that basically ends the chance of being a contender imo. It doesn’t look like anyone on our team has a chance to be a top 4-5 player, so I would rather save the assets in case. 20% chance at ant >>>>>> 100% chance at fox.
     
    Hemingway likes this.
  3. Rox>Mavs

    Rox>Mavs Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2010
    Messages:
    2,600
    Likes Received:
    1,286
    isnt incremental improvement a viable play though in the event Ant shakes loose? If all you give up is FVV, a couple of the the young guys + a couple picks and that’s an improvement in terms of asset (Fox > than that package) then if Ant or someone else is available, you have Fox to use as a trade.

    If none shake loose you still have a Fox in the hand.
     
    Corrosion, Rockethard and Boii like this.
  4. Hemingway

    Hemingway Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2016
    Messages:
    10,647
    Likes Received:
    13,867
    This.
     
  5. Houston77

    Houston77 COOKIES AND CAKE, MY TEAM BAKED!
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2018
    Messages:
    7,662
    Likes Received:
    19,188
    There is also the chance we sit on our assets until they slowly fade away as drafts come and go.
     
    #125 Houston77, Dec 24, 2024
    Last edited: Dec 24, 2024
  6. Houston77

    Houston77 COOKIES AND CAKE, MY TEAM BAKED!
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2018
    Messages:
    7,662
    Likes Received:
    19,188
    We will never have the assets we have now (and this upcoming offseason) towards a trade. We have two grand slams in Sengun and Amen, as well as the perfect complementary piece in Smith. We have one major weakness — scoring efficiency at the guard positon. If you can land a top 25 overall player in his 20s who fills this need without giving up Amen or Sengun, you do it, period.
     
    Corrosion, Phillyrocket, Y2JT and 3 others like this.
  7. aelliott

    aelliott Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 1999
    Messages:
    5,925
    Likes Received:
    4,885
    We have a pg, sg, c and sf who are all near the bottom of the league in efficiency for starters at their position. We also have no goto guy/ closer. We are one of the worst shooting teams in the league. We have multiple issues to solve.

    That being said, I agree that if you can go get a top 25 guy, then you do it in most cases.
     
    jch1911 and HP3 like this.
  8. astrosrule

    astrosrule Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,704
    Likes Received:
    7,603
    I don’t agree with this at all. Fox will be a massive albatross when he gets his new deal, he will be making at minimum 30% of the cap and is nowhere near that level of player. Plus we will have less young guys and picks, it would take us out of the running for any elite player.
     
    Y2JT likes this.
  9. astrosrule

    astrosrule Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,704
    Likes Received:
    7,603
    Ya absolutely. It’s just a difference of philosophy. My ONLY interest is maximizing our chance to win a title. Trading assets for fox decreases those odds a good bit, even if it makes us better short term. I could not care less if we win 46 or 50 games this season, my only interest is development (i would be playing reed 25 mpg for example). I would rather risk those assets turning into nothing than lighting them on fire for short term gain. It’s also clear at this point IMO that nobody we have has legit top 4-5 player in the league potential, so we have to maximize our chance to acquire that player.
     
  10. Rox>Mavs

    Rox>Mavs Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2010
    Messages:
    2,600
    Likes Received:
    1,286
    I suppose this comes down to how much faith you have in stone to negotiate a deal that isn’t negative value. If you don’t then it’s one shot one kill with our assets. I think stone can manage it though.
     
  11. astrosrule

    astrosrule Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,704
    Likes Received:
    7,603
    Fox turned down 55/year from the kings. There’s nothing to negotiate, if you trade for him you max him because the kings are willing to.
     
  12. MystikArkitect

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2006
    Messages:
    14,095
    Likes Received:
    22,904
    Amen + Sengun means this team isn't interested in Fox. He's a non shooter and is essentially smaller, older Amen with worse defense.

    Keep the picks for when a real shooter hits the market. But we need to figure out who out of Fred, Jalen or Dillon gets relegated to the bench. Amen is literally 1% below Jalen on 3s this year. Booker fits much better but makes way too much money.
     
    Y2JT likes this.
  13. thegary

    thegary Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Messages:
    11,004
    Likes Received:
    3,127
    I see how you forgot the part about fox having waaaaaaaaaay better offense.
     
  14. aelliott

    aelliott Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 1999
    Messages:
    5,925
    Likes Received:
    4,885
    He's also one if the best closers in the league. See his 2023 NBA clutch player if the year award.

    26+ pts/gm on good efficiency isn't anything that we have on the roster.
     
    Corrosion, Phillyrocket and thegary like this.
  15. dmoneybangbang

    Joined:
    May 5, 2012
    Messages:
    22,531
    Likes Received:
    14,262
    I'm on team, look into Fox.

    His first 4 seasons vs his last 4 seasons shows a player that has grown a lot. Yes, he isn't a shooter and doesn't fit every need but there's no rule that the perfect fit will become available in a timely manner.
     
    Corrosion, pm713 and jch1911 like this.
  16. dmoneybangbang

    Joined:
    May 5, 2012
    Messages:
    22,531
    Likes Received:
    14,262
    Amen can't run on an offense full time..... While I don't think Ime wants a heliocentric offense, Amen still have ways to go to even sniff becoming a primary ballhander on a playoff team.
     
    Corrosion likes this.
  17. astrosrule

    astrosrule Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,704
    Likes Received:
    7,603
    The clutch stuff is mostly small sample size variance, and his efficiency is pretty overstated. He's only been above league average twice, including this season where he's 1% above, so it's not like he's giving you game changing elite efficiency. He also can't shoot and doesn't defend. He's a good player, he's better than FVV (this season, in past seasons maybe not), he would help the rockets, but he's not an impactful game changer.
     
  18. Rox>Mavs

    Rox>Mavs Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2010
    Messages:
    2,600
    Likes Received:
    1,286
    I’m 60/40 on a Fox upgrade if the price is right. None of us know what GMs know and how players like Fox are valued around the league. Ultimately it’s risky either way and I’d rather move on from FVV sooner than later. But I trust Stone to make the right call.
     
    jch1911 likes this.
  19. astrosrule

    astrosrule Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,704
    Likes Received:
    7,603
    There's no risk to NOT getting fox because if you miss out on him, who cares? We know what he is. The risk of getting him and missing out on a potential real star is massive.
     
    Y2JT likes this.
  20. thegary

    thegary Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Messages:
    11,004
    Likes Received:
    3,127
    If we look into fox it is to replace Fred. I’d give up reed, Tari, filler and picks. Fox, Jalen, Amen, Bari and Goon. Very formidable
     
    pm713 likes this.

Share This Page