Scientific America has never been widely respected amongst scientists. It's always been trashy and speculative. It's like quoting a a tabloid for a research paper.
Well............ He was elected by the masses. The government does generally not make money She is working for a private entity. Their job is to make money. Alienate the Trump voter, lose subscriptions, lose profits, lose job. The two are apples and oranges. Although I suspect you comment was a bit in jest, and it made me laugh a bit. Not milk out the nose laughter but a chortle non the less.
The definition of science is ever expanding. The definition of religion is ever expanding The definition of politics is ever expanding It was inevitable they would start to intersect Rocket River
Ivanka and husband made 2 Billion So expect them to at least doube that this time around Rocket River
Yes but the government did not make money I'm not understanding what you are saying has anything to do with my comment. My statement was just clarifying private and public sector. They are MUCH different.
The people who barely graduated high school with a C average, most of them more than 50 years ago, carried Trump to victory. That's just fact. Go look at the education levels and ages of voters. I don't think you're qualified to tell us anything about what science is or isn't.
How Scientific American's Departing Editor Helped Degrade Science When magazines like Scientific American are run by ideologues producing biased dreck, it only makes it more difficult to defend the institution of science itself. https://reason.com/2024/11/18/how-scientific-americans-departing-editor-helped-degrade-science/
No they didn't. Jared Kushner managed two billion dollars' worth of Saudi assets, they were not paid that amount by anyone. They have a collective net worth of about $800 million, which seems to be mostly related to assets they held prior to 2016, primarily Kushner's real estate holdings.
