video deserves to be cross-posted had to watch it three times dude is just expressing what people with common sense are feeling
I do believe it is the vast majority of women, although “vast majority” is a bit amorphous. I have read that Kamala has gained a lot of ground with white women voters relative to that cohorts voting in 2020, almost certainly due to the abortion issue. But I think that is counterbalanced against her loss of support from men. Hence the close race. as for the college educated men - I brought that up in response to ATW posting that (1) angry women, and (2) weak men are the only ones voting for Kamala. I think it is lazy and pointless to describe the voting trends in that manner. So instead, I posted an actual objective descriptor of a cohort of men who are voting for Kamala (as opposed to the mindless drivel of “weak men”). Being college educated simply means you have more schooling or education than someone who does not. It only means you have probably had access to more information than someone who did not go to college, although a non college educated man can gain information themselves. But I assume they are working and have less time to get information than a full time college student. I think those are boring, basic factual observations. I’m no rocket scientist but I think these are truisms. similarly, It does not mean you are a better human being. There are plenty of college educated men who are terrible human beings, and plenty of non college educated men who are wonderful people.
No - he was born in the USA. His father was very smart, went on a show similar to Jeopardy, won a lot of money and moved to Australia when he was young. Gibson is a US citizen and an Irish citizen.
Are you saying "catturd" and "random guy in a basement" are not actual news reporters? Come on, they got the blue verified thingy and everything...
They are more honest than most news reporters. Credit to Anderson Cooper for having a professional ethos.
Why? What are they more honest? What is your criteria for deciding if a outlet, individual reporter, journalist is more credible? I've got some criteria for me like for example, is said reporter or journalist only chasing headline level stories for engagement farming? Do they read entire court documents, legislative bills in its entirety before the express opinions, concerns etc? Do they cover very technical things that won't result in high engagement and clicks? I'm just curious what your criteria is.
Using propaganda tweets as a way to respond to a discussion is lazy at best and at worst ignorant or dishonest.
