Concur - there can be only ONE Scarface If @Scarface281 is afraid of @Mr.Scarface terms, then I believe there's grounds to say he's forfeited the very name. May need to get moderator involvement here
I'm agreeing to that but also with a signature change for a year. Why are you so afraid of that? Don't be a coward. Initially I said screen name change and signature update He cries and says "no posting for a year" I say fine, no posting for a year but also a signature update He won't accept, but I'm scared? Talk about mental gymnastics. Yall must be helping Kamala run her campaign too
Hmm … and yet she is likely ahead of Donald Trump in the popular vote and has a 50/50 chance of winning the election… Either she isn’t one of the worst candidates ever - OR - she is facing off against an even worse candidate. There is really no excuse for Trump to not be up 4-5% in the popular vote and an absolute landslide in the EC- other than the fact that either Harris isn’t a terrible candidate or Trump is even worse.
LOL I don’t agree with Melvin Gibson on some of his politics… but I love the guy… fully embraces his bad guy reputation when he smirks “I think everyone knows who I voted for.” …
Undeniably true, but regrettably maybe irrelevant to much of the idiotic voter base in this country. And for me, all I care about is defeating Trump and Trumpism and the hoards of ignoramuses on that train. And winning would be an lot easier without cackles or word salad, and this is coming from a guy who supports her over Trump and thinks she is doing a decent job for her talents and abilities.
Which "declarative statement" are you referring to, oh wise and self-righteous one? I said "Possible". What part of this leads to your outrage? Thanks in advance.
Oh I don’t know, maybe you posting you met dubya and he is authentic and witty, and she isn’t even close to his league. Perhaps that definite statement. Or more generally, you post with no regard for context (inability to co pare the two in the proper context, i.e., when they were candidates) or knowledge (dubya’s speaking ability as a candidate) or facts (blaming media for dubya sounding like a moron and for trump saying he wants to be a dictator and wants his generals to be obedient like hitler). And you read people poorly. It’s not outrage. It is disdain.
As usual, you are making zero sense. It is obvious that you aren't the sharpest tool in the shed. You were complaining about me not remembering how articulate George W. was as a candidate, when I even said "possible". I patiently explained to you why, taking into account your limited intellectual capacity. Then you try to move the goalpost. Try to pay more attention next time, then it will be less embarrassing for you.
