Breh… something something glass houses. Trump literally looks like a disease is eating his face away and he is in agonizing pain. Rosie O’Donell is a terrible person and Mark Cuban has let sexual harassment run rampant with his business… but at least they look human and aren’t battling a horrendous social disease.
That is really what this is all about for Musk. He deeply resents any limitations on what he can or cannot do - any restrictions from the government… and Trump appears to be on board with gutting them all. That is what really matters to Elon…. And why he can go from saying Trump should be disqualified to supporting Trump.
This is precisely why he didn’t do 60 Minutes. For all the claims Harris is an empty vessel and avoids answering questions and doesn’t discuss policy - she is Bismarck compared to Donald Trump.
A snippet doesn't tell the whole story, which was at the end the Bloomberg crowd gave Trump a standing ovation. The crowd loved him the entire time. Bloomberg also invited Kamala to discuss economics at length but of course she declined.
I think you're basically right but might underestimate something that Elon and the Donald share: a drive to get back at people who insult them, who hurt their little pee pees, to be technical about it. And they both have a lot of energy for that pursuit. Taking names, etc. That drove Elon to go for Twitter, despite the bad business move of it all, and he's obviously sick of all the snarky libs. And the same basic factor drove the Donald to run for POTUS, after Obama made fun of him for the birther nonsense.
Would she drain the swamp Not get us in wars, let Israel destroy Iran's nuke capabilities? Release the JFK/RFK commission stuff? Epstein list? Lower inflation/Gas/Food/Home prices? If she could do these things I would vote for her. But since she's Paul Ryan's candidate I probably just wouldn't vote at all.
They can tweet each other and Trump can mock her for not doing the Bloomberg interview and Harris can mock him for backing out of 60 Minutes and now CNBC.
They abortionists wouldn't vote for her and that's the reason Harris is carrying the suburban college educated women. They want their abortions on demand. Personally I think the happy medium to make a decision should be 3 months. But the women I mentioned above still wouldn't vote for anybody who tried to reach this compromise.
I'm honestly curious: how would letting Israel destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities (as if that's easily done) not lead to a war that we'd be deeply involved in?
The world's not safe when Iran gets nuclear weapons and keeping them from getting a nuclear weapon would be worth going to war over. IMHO After seeing what Israel has done so far, I've got little doubt they could easily destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities. BT, when Israel comes together with the Saudi's to try to prevent Iran from getting a nuke then you know things are serious.
Remember when the US and many other nations had agreements that would give them access to monitor Iran's nuclear program to make sure none of it was going towards nuclear weapons? Too bad Trump withdrew from that and removed any way to monitor the program. Oh well.
Who would have thought that giving the guy with billions in federal funds and subsidies, and billions more dependent on safety regulations, the power to "fix" the system is a wonderful idea?
