This is what you tried to do the other day when talking about crime. You brought up hillbillies doing drugs as "committing crimes" as if it is the same thing as property or violent crime. Nah you just want to live in an echo chamber. Can't handle any disagreement, even when the facts and data aren't on your side lol
your wilful ignorance manifest itself. right off the bat, in his first year, Trump signed into law tax cut for the top 1%, which reduced revenue contributing to the heighten deficits before pandemic. willful ignorance on your part. Biden spendings come in the form of infrastrucutre bill (one that Trump promised, but failed to deliver0 CHIP act BBB all of which have led to millions of higher-paying jobs
Donny lost the right to complain at the backseat when he broke his commitment and ran away from his 60 Minutes interview. That sums up how he led the US the last time around.
He "ran away" because CBS wouldn't apologize for lying about the hunter biden laptop thing. This is the cloud seeding they do in my area. From the Orange County website: https://sawpa.gov/santa-ana-river-watershed-cloud-seeding/
You can do better than that. How 60 Minutes found out Donald Trump would not participate in an election special In my day, when one commits to an engagement, then flakes the week before said engagement by bringing up years-old grievances, it'd be called b****ing out.
Looks to me like a standard editorial practice. For brevity and clarity, they edited the response. Trump's tweet makes it sound like they cut an answer from some different interview or a different question and pasted it here, but that's not what happened. They just shortened it. And, I can appreciate the argument that even doing that much still distorts her meaning and appearance. I'd agree. But add these considerations. 60 Minutes doesn't represent that it is the full, unedited interview which they indicate it is long and wide-ranging. They have to fit everything they deem important into the time they're allotted. Standard practice would be to confirm that the edited version is acceptable to the interviewee as an accurate representation of their thinking. And, they aren't hiding the fuller quote, which they themselves released in a different context. Trump would like to cast an interview like a performance where his opponent can fail and viewers can find fault. Journalists would see it not as a performance but an opportunity to understand the substance of a candidate's point of view. Not sure it would have a large audience or anything, but they should release the whole un-edited version so people who want it can get the unvarnished answers. In our age of misinformation, that should be SOP.
These chronically-online losers want 24/7 livestreams of Harris just to see a few seconds of something that confirms their preconceived notions.
It doesn't have to be, but in your case it is pretty much cowardice. Online here at least, you only support one of the candidates and make infinite often inaccurate posts criticizing the other major party candidate. It looks like you are only voting third party to avoid taking any responsibility at all. But it is abundantly clear where your heart lies and which candidate you want to win.
Would you guys just stop it with your obsession with the Polymarket crap?? There is one guy who is an obvious billionaires (some think it's Elon himself) whose millions of dollars he's bet on Trump completely fck with the percentages here. Polymarket's own guy who Peter Theil hired is Nate Silver who came up with the 538 model, and the 538 model right now shows Harris winning 55 out of 100 simulations. https://bbs.clutchfans.net/threads/official-kamala-harris-for-president-2024.323776/page-439 And all 538 is would be a polling average with some slight weights towards Trump because of the 2016 un-seen Trump vote. Who freaking cares about the Polymarket and Peter Theil's stupid gimmick to make money on election betting? It's so freaking stupid.
