there was no way he hurt the Trump campaign. It was a complete win but just is how much of a win it was. The fact he didn't hammer walz on several areas he easily could have, one of the most notable ones being the tiannamen square incident, will come off better with moderates
Again. It doesn't offend anyone that I'm aware of. It just isn't a winning point or the burn you desporately wish it was.
I do like how the bombshell revelations of Walz’s ties to Chinese Communists is that he was in Hong Kong in August of 1989 than June 1989.
You have complained about it for weeks now, it has to bother you.... But if Vance can be friendly and respectful then I too will respect your feelings...
Not even, tampon tim is just fitting... I don't use it as a burn or winning point, its just a really good nickname....
the Jan 6th and election certification non-answer was very damning…election denialism does not play well with non-MAGAts
So is it desperate to think Walz had a complete win? Like I said, Vance helped his favorability. He's also going to help out the Trump campaign in the polls throughout the Midwest. PA is basically gone come November 5
I never claimed Walz had a complete win. If you’re claiming Vance had a complete Win because someone else is saying Walz did that is pretty desperate. Sure Vance didn’t do a bad job but he was hamstrung by having to defend Trump’s. Given that you were claiming even before the debate that Trump was going to win PA it sounds like your mind was made up already and your just determined to convince yourself that Your side is going to win. It’s like if I said yesterday “The Stros Are gonna win the World Series!” And even after today when they lost a very close game I still say “It’s in the bag the Stros are gonna win the World Series!” That’s clearly me trying to pump myself up and downplay that while they played well they still lost a close one and there are many flaws in their game.
I'm not saying Vance had a complete win because of what anyone else said, just calling it like I see it. Vance sounded 100x sharper than anyone we have seen run for president the last 20 years, meanwhile Walz sounded like the typical sound-byte anecdote statement politician Also don't remind me of that lol. Hoping for better things tomorrow
Please tell Us how a guy who won 6 elections as a Democrat in a red leaning district and then two elections as governor and one in a year there was supposed to be a red wave is a buffoon and in over his head? Who also got a lot of legislation passed including when he had a divided legislature is a bad negotiator.