"Women can do what they want but we have to call them baby killers" is not giving women freedom. I don't know about you but usually society treats "baby killers" with prison time or execution. You are not giving women agency over their lives when you call actions they do equivalent of murder of children. Don't play stupid.
[/QUOTE] Ol Chowder thinks he is he is the smartest they/them on this board. Funny part is anyone can go back and show the actual statements written that he takes excerpts from to fit his narrative and voice it for all to see. I'm just too lazy to spend time researching my old posts to point it out to they/them. By too lazy, I mean I go outside and do things. Signed, The Dining Room Manager
When someone never claims or brags about being smart or intelligent and someone who always disagreed with them comes out and says "this dude thinks he's so intelligent" that is telling me your true feelings about me. I'm flattered. I never express any sentiments about being more intelligent. You are doing it for me. Thanks. But I really want to learn the type of interactions you have with college aged woman as a owner of college dining halls where you'd fear getting "canceled" because you somehow magically are engaged about gender identity politics with these girls. The only scenarios I can think of involve you being creepy. Sorry bud.
Within the law, there are degrees of murder/killing. 1st degree 2nd Voluntary manslaughter Involuntary manslaughter In all of those cases, one person killed somebody else. In abortion, one person killed (or allowed a 3rd party doing it) another person. Murder is what it is -- it's just legal in most states -- some states it is *not* legal btw, probably because it's murder. I understand you liberals hate calling it what it really is. Now, it's not really called abortion anymore -- it's become "reproductive rights". Yeah, sugarcoat it as much as possible... lol
Ya I know. You are the one who claims you are giving women a choice to do abortions but then contradict yourself by labeling it as murder. That isn't giving a woman a choice is it? That's like saying "you are free to rape people but you will face prison". No, that means you aren't allowed to rape people. So why even say that you want to give women agency? You don't. And you need women constrained in their life choices to be more successful in obtaining a female partner.
You must just sit in your gamer chair waiting for any and all responses. Still have not contributed to this board yet? I can Venmo you some cash. Bro go get some vitamin D, that comes from the sun you know.
They/them has never announced. So, in today's world. I am addressing that individual in the most respectful of ways without presuming, as not to offend they/them.
Oh it's dick swinging contest time. You post your resume first to show your superior manhood. Then I'll post mine.
The awesome thing about respecting women as equals, using "the person must be a woman" as an insult doesn't work to offend.
Don't worry about me, I'm just a dining Room Manager right? And yet I can come up with the cash to be a contributing member. Again, I would rather go outside, listen to some Rush, have a cocktail, and visit with my wife who is an equal earner and equal partner in this relationship. Can't put a price on that. But you can put a price on contributing to the board that offers you a platform to show how weird you are. Signed, The Dining Room Manager
You really are offend by that huh? You are very insecure about being a dining hall manager apparently. Because the only reason I brought that up was to express the notion that there is no reasonable encounter with a college aged girl to randomly fear being canceled over telling them what a woman is. I'd say the same thing about a software engineer working for Raytheon. It's creepy dude. You fear of being canceled over telling college girls what women are as a profession that doesn't naturally interact with college girls like this is creepy. A gender studies professor discussing this with college aged girls makes sense. With you, no. But I suggest being a lot more secure about your career, business etc. You seem easily triggered by the mere mention of your profession or business.
The truthful reality is women don't even see themselves as equal to men. They admit it themselves, but it's usually covertly.
Kamala Harris has received the endorsement of more than 400 economists and economic policy experts, who wrote in an open letter that the vice-president “will work relentlessly to build a strong, pro-growth economy for all Americans”. The group includes former treasury, commerce and labor secretaries; a former vice-chair of the Federal Reserve; and a Nobel laureate, among many others. Of Donald Trump, the group writes: Donald Trump’s proposed policies risk reigniting inflation and threaten the United States’ global standing and domestic economic stability. Nonpartisan researchers have predicted that if Donald Trump successfully enacts his agenda, it will lower GDP growth and increase the unemployment rate. The endorsements of Harris follow similar open letters from a group of more than 100 Republican foreign policy and national security officials, and more than 700 former military and national security officials. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...08cbeb70238e66#block-66f2bde88f08cbeb70238e66
The answer to your question depends on one’s viewpoint. If you believe that an egg and sperm already form a baby, the answer is clearly no. In fact, not only would the answer be no, but a woman should also face criminal charges if she knowingly harms the egg and sperm combination. At the very least, if she acts with intent, she should be charged with murder. If she unknowingly does so (as it’s common for women not to realize they are pregnant until ~4-6 weeks), she should be charged with involuntary manslaughter. On the other hand, if the view is that an egg and sperm are merely a cluster of cells, the response would be more along the lines of 'mind your own business.' In reality, most Americans don’t lean toward either extreme. Historically, Roe v. Wade represented a middle ground for decades. In this case, the likely answer would be that once a woman knows she is pregnant and expecting, the use of illegal drugs (which are already banned) would carry additional penalties if they harm a viable fetus. However, alcohol use, which is legal, would likely not result in further punishment, as that could open a slippery slope—leading to regulations on everything from exercising to taking enough vitamins. Today Democrats have consistently defended women’s rights, which explains why women began shifting from supporting Conservatives to Liberals around the 1980s. This shift became more pronounced recently, as Republicans started stripping away those rights, particularly by treating women as criminals who 'want to kill babies.' It seems women are now responding by holding MAGA Republicans accountable for taking away their rights and making immoral accusations against them.
