Her accomplishments outside of her role as VP holding Wells Fargo accountable for their corruption to the tune of 25 billion. She also in a matter of weeks has run an amazing and superior presidential campaign when most candidates have up to a year. She made a great choice of Tim Walz as VP
I've asked before which of the provisions you were against and didn't really answer. The boarder patrol themselves supported the bill.
Ok ya keep mentioning the bill, but why was the federal government messing with Texas, when we tried to stop 'em from coming in? This administration wants 'em here
Just going to remind people that Biden after the failure of the bipartisan border bill put in an executive order that had many of the features of the border bill. Since then crossings have greatly decreased. To remind those who don’t know how the structure of Us government works. The Federal government under the Constitution enforces borders and immigration not states. That’s why Texas can’t have their own border policy. Executive orders don’t have the same force as laws passed by Congress and previous similar executive orders were overturned in court challenges. The current one passed by Biden likely will too and is only a band aid to cover Congressional inaction.
Trump is PRO CHOICE, but ... EVERY SINGLE FEDERAL JUDGE HE HAS AND POTENTIALLY WILL APPOINT IS HARD CORE PRO LIFE.
Because Texas was putting people unnecessarily in danger. I do keep mentioning the bill because it put more agents in place, would speed up the asylum situation, reduce fentanyl trafficking, had the support of the border patrol and the votes to pass, until Trump interfered. Obviously Trump is the one that wants them here for his own selfish reasons. If he didn't, he wouldn't have stopped the bill from passing.
Grading on the Trump Curve I see. Walz said once "weapon in war" when he meant "weapon of war". And we wonder if the Kamala/Walz could survive Walz using the wrong preposition once.
Some say Trump doesn't lie . .. . he just be bullsh!tting . .. Dumb Libs cannot tell the difference Rocket River
lol. she was part of a team of 48 other state attorneys. If thats the best ya got .... boo This is the difference between you and I - While I am considering voting for Trump, only based on his policies, I still think he is despicable and a terrible candidate. I also think he runs a poor campaign. Harris is not running an amazing campaign. She hasn't even held a debate! How can you in your right mind even think this is superior or amazing? And Tim Walz is not a great choice. Your a biased leftist who would defend the worst of people if the had a D beside their name. You vote party over country 100% of the time.
You seem unfamiliar with the details of the Wells Fargo case. The other AGs wanted to settle for significantly less. She said no and took the lead on getting more. That amount is largely due to her. If that's the best reply you have to her leadership in holding Wells Fargo accountable... boo! Most nominees have had close to year to organize, vett candidates, prepare the organization come with a message and theme. Harris has done it in weeks. Walz is extremely popular and obviously really gets under the skin of Trump and his supporters. He has is relatable, genuine, in government for the right reasons and has a long record of service to the nation constituents and community. I certainly don't vote party over country and until 2020 I never voted a straight party ticket.
If you are voting for Trump based on his policies, you are voting for your preferred policies over country. The most important argument against voting for Trump is not a partisan one. The man was directing his people to find a way to throw away votes and have him installed as President. But for the choices of a few people in his own party, he may very well have been successful in that effort. I don't understand how any American who foremost cares about country could cast a vote for him after that.
Look. If Harris retired tomorrow and the WF was her best accomplishment, kudos. We have an entire congress who holds out for a better deal, year in and year out. It sounds like you are saying she would make a good congress woman. You're also dismissing that you repeatedly defended that Biden was sharp as a tack when it was obvious to any non partisan the man should have never ran again. Democrats completely fumbled the play and then turning around calling a mulligan by saying she is running a great campaign in just a few short moments. Your team ****ed up and Harris was #2. She is part of the problem. Again, she has never won a primary despite running multiple times and she has yet to have an open debate. She is a failure in a system that gives the appearance of competency in a current political system that almost guarantees a 50/50 chance regardless who is on the ticket Let me put it this way. Anyone running against Trump should be running away with the nomination. If they are not, they are a shitty candidate. We have not had a strong leader on the ballot since Obama. I am not trying to convince you to vote for her, but you sound just as silly as the Trump supporters when you claim she is doing awesome. She is trash.
