Huh? it must be really bad for them to not want to release the transcript for a short ass 18 minute interview with two candidates. I'm laughing right now this is terrible.
Or CNN wants people to watch it lol. Why release a full transcript ahead of time and undercut ratings? That answer also isn't bad if you believe climate change is real. The clock is ticking and there are other deadlines, like the amount of carbon in the atmosphere, that are not time-bound.
Transcripts are usually released a short while after an interview airs to account for ratings, so nah it ain't that. Her answer didn't make sense but I'll give her grace in that it's a short 15 second clip. But then again, it's her campaign trying to block the transcript release. Whats hilarious about climate change is people like me were saying the world goes through it years ago, but were called conspiracy theorists because "no it's global warming".
Sounds like what is in the Paris Accords. I think heavy industry has operated for far too long under the idea that things are tomorrow problems so they don’t need to be addressed today because it’s better for the bottom line to ignore the negative externalities.
It's kind of like a long, slow education of a sociopathic toddler. Industry: I want to work them 7 days a week, for as many hours as I want! Society: Well, we decided it would be better to not do that. Let's try 5 and 40ish. Industry: I want to work children then! They have energy! Society: We're not going to let you do that anymore, either. Industry: Well, at least I can chop down all these trees! Each one means $! Society: Pretty much, yes. But leave some by the roadways and we're going to set aside some parks here and there. Industry: Cool, cool. And I can keep pumping out this sludge into rivers? Society: [Inhales past teeth] About that. No, we definitely want to have our rivers not be 100% toxic and flammable. Industry: Damn you're mean. I'll always have my smokestacks, as long as local pollution isn't too bad, right? As long as birds aren't literally falling covered in ash directly from the sky? Society: Pretty much, LOL. We don't even know how to think about carbon. 33% of us don't even think it's a thing.
How much proof do people need to acknowledge dip$hit's utter unfitness to be president? Ask 200 former Republican officials what they think... Ask dip$hit's own former cabinet officials what they think... If you're still supporting this clown, you're an idiot.
Kamala could literally solve gravity with a new mathematic equation and you guys would post crap telling us how stupid she is. The question really is why the hell would anyone give a rats a$$ what you think about a Democrat?
I'm noticing more MAGA supporter desperation around my own social media as well. More IG stories and posts. Kamala supporters are mostly somewhat muted and staying low profile. I think it's because people are feeling there's no point in arguing with people entrenched in the MAGA cult so it's just better to go vote quietly. I think the reverse of 2016 is happening. The "quiet majority" has flipped. But clearly, MAGA is in the minority this time around.
Because you lack integrity. A person with integrity would never vote for a serial rapist, a pedophile, a fraudster, a conviccted felon....there is no way to say truthfully if you have TRUE integrity that you would support Donald Trump, he is a crook, and people know it, and don't care - that is a lack of integrity. DD
Because I'm a former Democrat who voted for Obama twice but the Dem party today has left me. Started with how they did Bernie in 2016 which turned me off from the DNC completed. Nah you're the one stuck on mcdonalds. A random tweeter isn't "maga", who by in la
So why would you choose to support Trump who is the opposite of almost everything that Bernie stands for?
Yoy haven't been paying attention then. Kamala campaign via act blue has been flooding the internet with pro Kamala bots. Kamala supporters haven't been silent at all. It's been nonstop making fun of Trump, Vance, weird, "they have nothing", Trump wasnt really shot, etc.
Because the Dems didn't deserve my vote for sabotaging an internal candidate. They then did it again in 2020 to Tulsi and then to RFK in 2024. No matter how you feel about their views, those things shouldn't have happened.
In other words you don't care about the issues or principles you just want to get back at the DNC for grievances over candidates you supported. Even though one of them, Sanders, supports Harris, and for RFK and Sanders Trump opposes most of the policies they championed.
