The Biden and Kamala administration for reelection was dead in the water but the Kamala for president isn't? Most the hype Kamala has is from mainstream media, the people in this country know who Kamala and how bad she has been at everything. I'm not fooled by the bs, Trump will win by a landslide...
Here let's break this down so our resident CEO can understand. Who sets policy for a company? The CEO or the President? If the President says "I would like to do this" and the CEO doesn't want to approach it that way does the President do it anyway? The Vice President of the United States does not set policy. You know this or you are mentally challenged. I am not sure which. Now run along. Aren't you late for an "Anchor Babies for Trump" meeting?
The momentum of Vice President Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign helped push the ratings for the Democratic National Convention past the Republican festivities for former President Trump. Nielsen data showed that Harris’ well-received acceptance speech was watched by 29 million viewers across 15 networks. The figure is 14% higher than for Trump’s speech, which scored 25.4 million viewers July 19.
Biden has his own vision and policies. Kamala either got behind them or she really has not as much say. Have your ever worked in your life? What about holding a corporate job? Ever worked under one person, see them retire and then their 2nd in command takes over? It's never quite the same, there is always change when leadership changes. I don't know why you guys cling on to this bullshit that Kamala has a major say in how the Biden administration chooses to do things. I mean, sure, I'm sure she has some say and some influence, but likely not to the level that you imagine.
Why ya'll acting? Of course she has responsibilities and influence, even the king's hand in game of thrones has responsibilities and influence. The inconvenient truth is that Biden and Harris are president and vp and are responsible for everything the country has seen within the past three years, you can't pick and chose what she is and isn't responsible of behind your she isn't president shield. She isn't just chosen to be vp in case something happens to the president, she has a job. She has a high ranking political job as the 2nd in command to the leader of the free world and ya'll want to just make her an employee and not a manager. This is why ya'll aren't taken seriously, because you aren't serious. You keep trying to sell this but people already bought it and are asking for a refund. Kamala was a terrible choice by the Democrat party if not the worst choice possible considering the disaster the Biden/Kamala administration has been... Good luck convincing people Kamala had nothing to do with this administration...
You are clueless about why this is happening. People actually likes Biden policies, but they thought he didn't have the energy to go after Trump. Harris is changing just enough of Biden's policies (Israel and Gaza for example), while bringing the ENERGY to go after Trump. People like the Prosecutor aspect of her and they want her to GO AFTER Trump. That debate on 9/10 may be the highest-rated debate in decades.
She hasn't even given an interview yet and you trying to say she has the energy? Lol cmon bruh... She has no policies, she is just throwing $hit on the wall to see what sticks and stealing policies from Trump to atleast have legitimate ideas that although she has no intention of doing at least sound good for The American people.... That debate is going to be a Kamala humiliation by the way....
Her acceptance speech was concise and efficient, with minimal filler content. Despite its brevity—just 38 minutes—it was both impactful and deeply serious. The delivery was excellent, elevating an already well-crafted speech that attempted to address all her weaknesses and showcase her strength. One thing that stood out to me was her exceptional ability to rapidly and seamlessly shift her emotional tone. She transitioned effortlessly from warmth when discussing her family and background, to grave seriousness addressing the threat posed by Trump, to projecting strength on matters of national security and patriotism, and finally to exuding joy and optimism about the future. I think that level of control over emotional projection transformed a well-written speech into a truly powerful presentation. Contrast that to Trump, who, I believe due to his mental issues, is emotionally limited, seemingly only able to express anger, resentment, and negativity. When he gives a speech that doesn't involve anger, mocking, or one of those negative emotions he's familiar with, it falls flat and seems emotionless. He appears incapable of talking about a joyful or optimistic future. This was evident in his 92-minute acceptance speech.
