Sucks his 2016 administration has so many ties to the heritage foundation. Sucks the Trump admin put so many judges the heritage foundation recommended onto federal and supreme courts. But besides all that… Trump wouldn’t lie right?
If you do some research, you will see the Project 2025 and Trump`s Agenda 47 are strikingly similar down to the wording, it looks like copied and pasted just about everything. Even though Agenda 47 it came from trump I doubt he could articulate any of it
Honestly are you like the dumbest guy here? What do you think the President actually does, do you think he sits in a big room pushing buttons and levers that run policy? No he has people that do that. Guess what his people did, and will do? Trump's Project 2025. Trump's Project 2025 is detailed map of policy that was not carried out the first time he was president becuase he was too disorganized and stupid and thought he was going to lose, and because people still had some shame. Now the goal is straight up autocracy, and Trump's Project 2025 is a roadmap to how to get there (also just ****ing weird and stupid bad policy in its own right) Anyway, I guess there's like 4-5 goofballs out there who earnestly think that the Syphilitic MAGA Emperor is somehow going to block his own admin from pursuing his own policies, but then you'd have to be dumb enough to vote for him a second time in the first place.
I am aware of trumps policies. I haven't seen Harris speak of any. All I've seen her do is wave her hands around describing the problem in different ways then talk about what Biden did or didn't do
I would really appreciate if you would soften your tone. You have already established I am the dumbest guy here and at this point, I am starting to doubt your sincerity. Please be more consistent. Thank you
On July 20th, at his Michigan rally, Trump said, "like some on the right, severe right, came up with this Project [20]25 , and I don't even know, I mean, some of them I know who they are, but they're very very conservative just like you have... they're sort of the opposite of the radical left, ok? You have the radical left and you have the radical right and they come up with this [Project 2025]...I don't know what the hell it is... "it's Project [20]25"...."He's involved in Project [2025]".. and then I read some of the things and they are extreme, I mean they're seriously extreme ... but ... I don't know anything about it. I don't want to know anything about it. " (Source - jump to 20:10, to hear the above statement about Project 2025) Sounds like he read some of it but not all of it. Could he be lying? Of course. I don't trust any politician to tell the truth all the time (nor should you). But if Trump says, "I support project 2025" you'll crucify him If Trump says, "I don't support project 2025" you'll say he's lying and you'll crucify him Welcome so Salem Massachusetts, 1692. .. and I never said agenda 47 is unhinged. I honestly don't know anything about Agenda 47 yet.
So what matters is the type of people Trump surrounds himself with. I wonder how many people who worked under the trump administration had a hand in project 2025?
So you are just shooting from the hip huh? Like maybe you are pointing out a tactical flaw of the DNC. Maybe they should just say agenda 47 instead of "project 2025" so they can be technically right and not have these rebuttal talking points.
He has an alternative to lying or trying to implement an autocracy - he should flee the country so he can stay out of jail. I could also say, be a normal human and not implement mass pogroms, but that weird deranged old **** is long past that.
Then it's just a magic coincidence that all his posts on the actions he will take to purge the "deep state" happen to be in that document he has not read? What difference does it make if he disavows Project 2025 if he is regurgitating its talking points? Either the source is Trump and Project 2025 is just putting it all down on paper, or Trump is reading from it. Does it really make a difference? You used to be against Trump and saw how horrible of a person and leader he is. Don't flip to like him for the culture wars.
Opinion: Harris is playing Trump’s game Her response to Donald Trump’s bigotry was a missed opportunity to deliver her own message. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...-harris-response-trump-racism-divisive-weird/ excerpt: It didn’t take long for Donald Trump and JD Vance to show us exactly what kind of campaign they’re going to run against their new opponent, Kamala D. Harris. At a gathering of Black journalists Wednesday, Trump blithely — and falsely — accused the vice president of only recently discovering she was Black. Later in the day, at a rally in Arizona, Vance said Harris talks with a Southern accent (not true) despite the fact that she “grew up in Canada” (not really true, either). Harris responded to all this by calling out Trump for his “divisiveness and disrespect” — words that appeared in headlines around the country. It was the way any normal person would probably respond — with measured anger. But Harris is not a normal person; she’s a presidential candidate now. And if she wants to beat Trump in November, she’s going to have to figure out how to run on her terms and not his. *** To put it simply, the campaign from here on out can be seen as a contest of conversations. Whenever Trump manages to engage Harris in arguing about identity or racism, no matter how right she may be, she’s helping him make his case. Whenever Harris is talking about Trump’s obsolete worldview and how to finally move past it, she’s running her campaign. Her response to this week’s attacks on her identity, then, might have been appropriate and even understated. But it was mostly a missed opportunity. To call Trump “divisive and disrespectful” — words that ricocheted around the internet with rocket-like speed — is to risk playing into the stereotype he wants to create. It enables him to caricature Harris as a Black woman who sees racism around every corner. Whereas it’s actually Trump who is endlessly obsessed with identity — that’s the point. And so a more disciplined response from Harris would have sounded something like: “I don’t know why he’s talking about me being Black again, or where I grew up, or whatever. It’s kind of strange, this fixation with who belongs and who doesn’t. The vast majority of Americans don’t really define each other by skin color or where their parents came from anymore, but I guess Donald missed all that.” more at the link
I think he is a malignant narcissist, personally. But the policies his future administration stands for are much, much more aligned with my political views than the leftist policies Kamala Harris stands for.
I would be more worried if I was the GOP with the Harris trending upwards in polls. Leading in some more recent ones. No wonder why you see the panic in trumps desperate attacks on Harris and doesn’t want to debate her etc. He is scared https://www.forbes.com/sites/sarado...ls-harris-leads-trump-in-3-surveys-this-week/
