especially when you bragged about how you only hire the best and everyone you hired is the best. the kind of turnover trump had is more reflective of what a poor executive he is than anything. in trumps case almost all the high level cabinet members he hired didnt work out. that shows poor judgement on his part.
I disagree and I watch both. The opinion shows are pretty biased on both channels but the normal news folks on fox are pretty good. I would say there are more dissenting voices on fox news. The program called the five is a good example of a show that has regular lefty guests. CNN is better than MSNBC in my opinion.
Hmm... The poor judgment is that he hired decent people, probably because he listened to decent people telling him who to hire that could run a government. Now that he's much more experienced, y'all aren't ready for the good judgment.
You have zero response to my statement that as a CEO, if you repeatedly hire and fire CFOs, COOs, General Counsels, and so on, you are an incompetent executive. Trump did that as president. He was incompetent. I really don’t care if you “had to make payroll.” For all I know, you managed a McDonald’s. I don’t care what you do or did. You have no response to the merits of what I said because you are mindless MAGA.
Elon Musk fired tons of C-levels. So did Jack Welch. So did Jamie Dimon. So did Steve Jobs. So did any CEO. According to management guru "Rileydog", they are all incompetent.
Did they do so the same number and over the same timeframe as Trump? Of course they didn’t. You know damn well none of these executives did. edit: Further to my point. Let’s take the very first name you mention. A quick google of Musk shows he fired Twitter executives when he took over. Thats like a change in administration. Did Musk then fire Twitter leadership repeatedly the next year, the year after that, and the year after that? Of course not. And you know he didn’t. Thats another hallmark of MAGA … intellectual dishonesty. Unlike Salvy and some of the other dipshits here, you actually have a brain. I disagree with your views, but you are not without a brain. Yet why make this point that other executives fire people, when you know damn well there is no comparing what Musk has done to Trump’s incompetence as a chief executive.
He won't make that mistake again. Next time he will insert guys willing to turn a blind eye to his criminal acts, say "Yes sir, pleased to help sir" to all requests, no matter how dangerous or completely irresponsible they are, and lie their butt off or plead the 5th if sh*t hits the fan. The shadier they are the better.
Thats cute. And has literally nothing to do with the merits of what I said. Unless you also think that a good CEO hires and fires his C suite executives like people change underwear.
You stated earlier that you are a lawyer. Do you only represent only Democrats or do you take checks from Mindless MAGA'S. Just curious why a fair and impartial member of the legal system would say such things.
I don’t represent or take checks from democrats or mindless magas. My clients are corporations, but they do have many people who work in them. You are confused as to the role of lawyers. We are advocates for the rights and positions of our clients. Each person or corporation is supposed to hire an advocate. There are rules of ethics that do govern the practice. Your reference to fairness and impartiality refer to the role of the jury and judge, who decide cases. I say mindless MAGA because it is demonstrated over and over again by MAGA on this board. No response to the merits of any points. Like here, the point I made was that Trump was a terrible executive because he repeatedly hired and fired his staff, creating chaos in leadership and their organizations. Not one reasoned response. It happens over and over when discussing Trump.
41 out of 44 cabinet members won't endorse Trump. It is significant when 41 out of the 44 people he hired and worked with him on a daily basis won't endorse him. He hired them to begin with. He is the one that selected them. If he had to fire that many, it means he sucks at evaluating talent or was unable to effectively lead them, or was so grossly unethical that they wouldn't go along with his schemes. One or more of those is shown by his pattern. It isn't a situation where he took over and fired people that were already there for a fresh start. It is a situation where he hired all of them and still couldn't work with them and they won't endorse him.
I'm sure your bosses would love to know your thoughts on MAGA. I hope you aren't accumulating billable hours while playing on your computer. And before you ask the same. I'm on vacation waiting for Delta to get their you know what together so I can head out to Ireland next week.
Emperor For Life Trump ? If Trump wins . . . who will follow him? Who will be the next Emperor er President for the Republicans? IS this VP guy the one they want to be president after Trump? Rocket River
Who cares what MAGAs think? They aren't the achievers in society, they aren't by and large corporate execs, they are for the most part, not all that educated, prone to conspiracy theories, and are on the low side of the IQ test. Now there are exceptions to every group - but MAGA is not full of the leaders in thought, education, or industry. DD
