If a CEO had the majority of the company's executives leave and/or denounce the way that CEO ran the company, there would be a lot of doubt about the suitability of that person for the CEO position. So, I'm genuinely curious how Trump supporters interpret not only this lack of public endorsement, but the turnover and criticism from cabinet members we've read about over the years. Wouldn't there be questions about whether Trump is truly suitable for the position of CEO of the country? I'm not trying to criticize, but it's something that I've had a hard time understanding.
I can tell you read into text things that aren't there. It wouldn't be damning if one or two of his cabinet positions were fired. It wouldn't be damning if 1 or two wouldn't endorse him. 41 of 44 will not endorse him. If you don't think that says something significant, you probably aren't the best judge. Even if you are the greatest ever entrepreneur the world has ever known. I'm oh so sure that you are.
Look at that MASSIVE bandage. It looks like someone glued a fancy app plate to his head. If he was wearing that a few days ago, it woulda shielded off the bullet.
https://freebeacon.com/author/stile...ominee-in-overwhelming-display-of-star-power/ Consider this mind-blowing fact: Linda McMahon, the former Trump administration official and wife of professional wrestling pioneer Vince McMahon, was one of three convention speakers Thursday night who has been on the receiving end of a "Stone Cold Stunner."
Is this really a re-written speech. or did they load the old speech into Teleprompter It went like another regular Trump speech
