Again the Rich and Famous get far far more "justice" than anyone else The days of this bullsh*t should be coming to an end Rocket River Getting sick of the Rich
You're not going to convince me she's a good She wasn't enforcing the law she was abusing iit. I don't care what you you think of me. You're a shill and a nobody
again, nobody is trying to convince you of that. please explain how exactly she was abusing the laws that she was tasked with enforcing. i bet you cant.
No one should care that I think you are dishonest and ill-informed. You continue to claim Kamala Harris is as corrupt as donald trump. Yet when challenged on why, you dodge that question. How is Harris as corrupt as someone that has been convicted by a jury on 34 felony counts. Someone to have been adjudicated as a rapist. Someone that was found by a court of law to have committed fraud. Someone awaiting trials on attempting to overturn the election and for mishandling of government top-secret materials. Heck, throughout his past he has broken laws, heck, he had to settle a lawsuit for racial discrimination for refusing to rent to black people. Someone that cheated on all of his wives. Someone that lies continually about everything and anything. So here's another chance... how is Kamala Harris "just as corrupt as donald trump?'
Those people are not to be taken seriously and better off ignored - they aren't able to critically think for themselves and are in a cult. The only thing the GOP is good at is propaganda, there is ZERO chance that Trump will get elected, the people hated him 4 years ago, he has only gotten worse. No one like Biden that much but 4 more years of him is better than 4 years of a convicted felon like Trump. The only thing even keeping this remotely close is that the GOP has funded and propped up RFK to try to steal the election. DD
Hunter Biden’s trial is just a political ploy to protect Joe — and the compromised DOJ https://nypost.com/2024/06/09/opinion/hunter-biden-trial-just-a-ploy-to-protect-joe-and-the-doj/ "Don’t see the Hunter Biden gun case as an effort to hold the president’s prodigal son to account, but as a political maneuver aimed at protecting the prosecutors, perhaps the defendant, and certainly his father. This sideshow diverts the public’s gaze from far larger corruption: Felony gun charges are piddling when weighed against the selling out of our country, not to mention the leverage Hunter’s dubious dealings and debauchery might have provided our enemies in the way of kompromat. Yes, it features many “shiny objects,” some juicy, and others genuinely newsworthy, from the riveting trainwreck that was Hunter Biden’s life at the time he committed the alleged offenses — lurid details of his drug abuse, relationships and recklessness — to the vindicating-for-The-Post-but-still-unbelievable Justice Department decision to enter the “laptop from hell” into evidence. Yet while special counsel David Weiss and, by extension, Attorney General Merrick Garland will play this as the Biden Justice Department’s pursuit of even the president’s son without fear or favor, it’s no such thing. First, Hunter may well be found not guilty, or at least get a hung jury. His team is tugging at the heartstrings of jurors hailing from a state in which the Bidens are royalty."
LOL... new york post. But shouldn't this inane disinformation op piece be in the hunter biden thread anyway. Y'all can't even figure that out?
LOL... catturd. And what tabloid disinformation source did this come from? And what does it have to do with trump's felony conviction????
These clowns are trying to say the 51 said conclusively the laptop was Russian disinformation. They did not say this. They said based upon their previous experience it had HALLMARKS of Russian disinformation.
We are about to see two very different outcomes from these trials, Hunter is protected and Trump is not.....
Two completely different trials, different crimes, different defenses presented, different testimony, different behavior by the defendants. I wonder why there might be two different outcomes?
That's some hardhitting journalism! Thank you. I'm reading this wondering why it is that no one knows the definition of "corruption." But, I like Transparency's treatment of it: "We define corruption as the abuse of entrusted power for private gain." The hush money trial is not a good example of corruption. That's just his criminality. The documents case is a better example, where he took his access to confidential documents as president and tried to get some private gain by keeping them. Or the Jan 6 coup, where he tried to use the powers of his office, of the vice presidency, and control of the House to get himself another term in office. Or that time where he tried to blackmail Zelensky into starting a fake investigation of Biden and Burisma to help him get re-elected. Or the way he would order the SS to rent rooms in his own hotels so he would transfer public monies into his private coffers. For Kamala Harris' mar1juana prosecutions, the best case I can make for corruption is that she aggressively prosecuted those offenses because she thought voters would reward her at the ballot box. We might just call that democracy though. I assume Trump will be as combative and rude as possible in this hearing with a probation officer.
You spout this "far left" nonsense. You do realize "far left" is some bullshit made up by the GOP right? In the worldwide definitions very few people in the US would be considered far left. In fact to the rest of the world, comparatively, the Democratic Party would be considered center right.
