Even funnier is some Trump supporter, who defends each and every crime he commits, or chooses to believe all his fact proven lies, telling others they lack critical thinking skills.
Is the jury really going to believe what the publisher of the National Enquirer says? The jury is not going to believe Michael Cohen either.
Correct, which is why there are corroborating documents in the business records and recorded conversations. The case would be impossible to prosecute if it were only for their testimony. Luckily, they've done a good job getting the corroborating documents to back it up.
Easy to obtain because there was no crime, unlike when Hillary destroyed all of the items subpoenaed by Congress. Did you care? Nah.
They love, worship, and adore their government masters. Truth is irrelevant to them. For them it's all about serving the all-powerful state! They're fascist that way.
If Trump is convicted there will be appeals and it will be tossed because this is a Kangaroo prosecution by a corrupt government, judge, and prosecutor. You should have been a German citizen in 1930's Germany. No doubt you would have worshipped their "judicial" system too.
All judges are government judges. If there are appeals, we'll let those courts determine that outcome.
The "evidence" is overwhelmingly obvious, but you won't accept it. Kangaroo "justice" and a Kangaroo judge.
The judge should have recused himself when it was discovered that his daughter was a left wing political fundraiser who MYSTERIOUSLY saw tens of millions of donations roll in after her father was assigned this case. Undeniable corruption to the core.
