No. My post contained deminstrable facts and absolutely didn't deny rape. You're just making crap up... again.
That was the same thinking that Al Qaeda used to justify 911. That every American was responsible for US actions in the Middle East.
hes a neo nazi dude. Remember the **** he posted when Obama was president (and I dislike Obama) That dude has a record of posting nazi/racist stuff against african americans. He also has some sort of severe disability
100K+ will likely die in gaza from starvation disease and wounds that they or outside organizations are not allowed to care for. It has been a while since we have seen this level of collective punishment and butchery in history. The world will not forget God bless Gideon Levy. Has more courage in him than the countless genocidal maniacs in this thread
@basso all the terrorists that the D&D posters love have to do is release all the hostages But they aren’t so Yippe Kai Yay
While you are technically correct (and I do feel for the children of Gaza), there was only one way to get the Nazis out of power and stop them from committing more atrocities, and that was to fight and defeat them militarily. Same with Hamas. Of course, then you still have the modern day Nazis like @trustme who live in the West but want more Jews to be murdered, but at least you cut off one of the main heads of the Hydra. To your credit, I believe you did say that that would need to be done, shortly after October 7.
The great wall was not able to be manned sufficiently, not to mention that the Mongol horde was one of the most powerful fighting forces ever assembled. Come on, man. Aren't you in architecture? You can't build a 100 story skyscraper out of wood because the floors above weigh down on the floors below. That is not at all an issue in lengthening a wall. There are issues building walls higher (mostly solved by building them thicker), not with making them longer. Agai Literally none of the objections you posted are responsive to what I said besides the first one (environmental impact). There would be species that are prevented from moving from one side of the wall to the other (that is the point after all). Manpower necessary is an objection to cost, not effectiveness. Remember, my point was that a wall with the same per unit length security would be equally effective regardless of length. This rebuttal is just that longer walls cost more. They don't cost more per unit length of course, they just cost the same amount per unit length, and as the length increases the cost increases. Maintenance is exactly the same response. Rough terrain increases the effectiveness of the wall (because it would be in addition to natural barriers). People finding other ways in is not an argument against walls being equally effective per area covered regardless of length, it is an argument that walls do not stop all methods of entry (which no one has argued against). We still have some walls, because people still try to cross the border in a straight line on the ground, even though those other methods are available. Making the wall longer does not increase the effectiveness of those other methods. The GWoC argument is fallacious (just because something doesn't work 100% of the time, doesn't mean that it has no positive value - the nirvana fallacy). The length of the border argument is just a restatement of the original argument. As for trade, the majority of all goods entering and leaving Gaza do so through the Egyptian border crossing. A wall is not designed to stop entry through a designated port of entry anyway, so the length of the wall does not make the security at the port of entry any more or less effective. My original claim - any greater length of wall with the same per unit length security is equally effective as the original wall.
More tunnels being blown up The Hamas company is innovating the way people move hostages and jihadists! @basso
Not surprised this post was liked by 3rd generation Nazi scumbag ATW. Genocide runs deep in his roots.
