Don't forget that even after Epistein was arrested trump was claiming ghiselle was a wonderful person and how he wished her nothing but the best lol. Why are MAGA are so utterly brainwashed and utterly dumb? Why?
I hope Trump drops dead so he isn't the nominee, so it wouldn't bother me in the slightest. But afaik he never flew on the Lolita Express or visited Pedo Island, so I doubt there is anything there.
Trump absolutely flew on Epstein’s planes, documented multiple times and presented as evidence in Maxwell’s trials. Willful ignorance on display here folks.
Episteins pilot testified in court under oath that he flew trump, Clinton and prince Andrew's around the world with Epistein.. https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/30/us/ghislaine-maxwell-pilot/index.html
I'm glad that we now have a president that isnt trying to keep this information from being made public.
Trump is basically the one person on planet earth we know was not banging epstein's kids. Your position is that the DoJ, who has tried throwing absolutely evwrything at Trump, are sitting on evidence he had sex with a minor.
We absolutely don't know that about Trump. The more logical non-tinfoil hat situation is that records that he was there isn't proof he committed crimes there. Until they have that proof they won't prosecute. None of the crimes Trump has been charged with were surprising. They waited until they had proof and Trump attempted to obstruct justice did they move against him.
well the DoJ have Maxwell, so they know exactly who diddled kids because she knows....... so you can use basic logic and say 'who would the DoJ want to protect?'. Obviously not Trump
Result = no prosecution (yet) Reason 1: Clearly innocent Reason 2a: Not enough available evidence Reason 2b: The alleged criminal is massively well funded and high profile so it's understood this will take extra resources to pursue Reason 3: Protectionism Reason 4 - x ...: Just because he hasn't been prosecuted doesn't mean all the reasons why are equal and now you can claim it must be reason #1 or #3 or whatever. As I often say, situational awareness matters.
you are making my case for me as the only reasons you listed above that would apply to Trump would be Reason 1 2a: they have Maxwell, so they have tons of evidence. 2b: they are throwing a million things at trump. this makes no sense. They are also desperately trying to convict before the election. 3: the DoJ is trying to protect Trump? you couldn't come up with one reason besides Trump being innocent that Trump is not being prosecuted for screwing kids.
Ghasille was never the mastermind behind the scheme. Jeffery was the ring leader of the scheme and numerous eye witnesses accounts have confirmed this. It's funny how Jeffery died while Bill barr was AG and in charge of his imprisonment. No matter how loud you yell trump and jeffery were BFFs and it's been confirmed by jeff's pilot that trump would ride in jeff's private plane numerous times. Facts hurt
The post you responded to said nothing about his position and did not assert that the DoJ is sitting on evidence he had sex with a minor. Why did you even assume that?
the DoJ has Maxwell. They have evidence of who was screwing kids. So if you claim 'Trump is one of Epstein's child molesters' then you are claiming the DoJ is covering it up. For example, I personally think Bill Clinton banged teenagers therefore i think the DoJ is covering it up. 'Maxwell doesn't know who was screwing kids' is a pathetic take even for you. of course she does. Trump flew on his plane therefore they are BFFs. oh ok. makes sense. Most people boot their BFFs out of their country club
Flying in someone's plane doesn't mean you participate in their dirty secrets (that's what some here have been trying to imply). Trump flew in Epstein's plane. That itself doesn't mean much of anything. But what's fascinating is Trump and his supporters love to use guilt by association (but of course, only in a one-way street). This goes back further than Trump. I'm sure some of you still remember some trying to emphasize "Barack Hussein Obama" to wrongly link him to Islam in a negative way. It was good that McCain didn't partake in that kind of divisive rhetoric. However, something that was once pushed aside to a dark corner is now common playground for Trump's divisive rhetoric, and his supporters not only accept it but love it. Yet of course they can't use their own flawed logic and apply it to Trump, but Clinton? Absolutely.
Your first point (they have evidence...) is an assumption. I'm not sure who claimed what and AFAIK, no one is claiming anything concrete except you here. Your claims are based on assumptions.
two assumptions: 1) the DoJ has Maxwell 2) Maxwell knows who was screwing the kids she trafficked which one do you find absurd?
