No I am not anti government. I have said the monetary system is broken and the current political parties are trash. I don't believe nor am I insinuating we should be overthrowing any government or that it needs to go away or whatever interpretation you came up with.
So then how do we get the monetary system fixed? How do we get better political parties? BTC? What? You just constantly crap on everything.
you have no idea what you're talking about. as compared to other central bank in the world, the US monetary system has been the most effective, bar none.
I crap on the things that are crap. The DNC and RNC are utter crap. Political parties are self serving. Its ok to have a view set and vote a certain way. Its not ok to swear allegiance to these corrupt parties. (ie: people like Deckard) Take the monetary system/BTC talk to the BTC thread if you want to discuss that.
Thanks for stating the obvious, sherlock. US monetary system works so well we have solved poverty in the US. Now we can work on the rest of the world.
The irony is they criticize the MAGAers for blindly following. The true moderates see they are the same. They’d follow their party into another holocaust
It's called the real world..... "Swearing allegiance"? How does hyperbole help your argument? I am democrat because they are by far the lesser of two evils. I would love some third parties to emerge.... but the current ones are utterly unserious about governance. You and @LosPollosHermanos just come off as uninformed, uncompromising, children.
Moderates don't try and compare the US budget to giving folks Ferraris and printing more money..... certainly don't use the bolded hyperbole..... You are not a moderate.
LOL. I guess you just have to resort to lying because you can't think of anything else...... Classic you! Trolololol.
this development also contributed heavily to the passage of the CHIP act The leading association of global chip companies is warning that Huawei Technologies Co. is building a collection of secret semiconductor-fabrication facilities across China, a shadow manufacturing network that would let the blacklisted company skirt US sanctions and further the nation’s technology ambitions. Several Taiwanese technology companies are helping Huawei Technologies build infrastructure for an under-the-radar network of chip plants across southern China, an unusual collaboration that risks inflaming sentiment on a democratic island grappling with Beijing’s growing belligerence. At a time when China threatens Taiwan regularly with military action for even contemplating independence, members of the island’s most important industry may be helping US-sanctioned Huawei develop semiconductors to effectively break an American blockade. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...-huawei-build-a-secret-network-of-chip-plants
Obviously, every lawyer researches the Constitution. I have taken classes about the Constitution, read books about the Constitution, and read thousands of cases interpreting the Constitution. How is that either double talk or flip-flopping? Believing in the Constitution is ideologically consistent with staying in America, since the Constitution is ostensibly the governing document which establishes the supreme law of the land in America. That's why I support SCOTUS justices that rely on the Constitution over stare decisis. I don't think you know what words mean. All your attempted gotchas are such nonsense.
I don't want to direct attention away from it, it is something I stand behind without reservation. This is exactly what I was talking about. How could you read what I wrote and think I was trying to direct attention away from the very thesis statement of what I was writing? Why would I mention ideological consistency to re-direct attention away from a statement about ideological consistency. You are terrible at this.
