You can twist my words all you want. I never said what happened with PJ was "no big deal". If you're a malfunctioning man and do not understand the difference between a man going at another man and a man beating a woman, then by all means, please mute me. We'll never see eye to eye.
I did read the entire context because the initial quote was so insane I assumed that reading it in context might help you. I went back and read all the relevant posts in that thread and the context didn't change what you said.
That's a cop out. There's ephemeral "business justification" around every action or inaction. For an org that literally just hired Udoka the second his suspension was lifted - you can't tell me they are a bunch of wizened deliberators. Like HP said there's really no downside to distancing themselves from KPJ asap. Embarrassing that they haven't. If this org has proven anything, it's that they're not to be trusted with respect to assessing KPJ.
Why is it always the trans activists that turn out to be pedos, you are certainly not helping the perception
If you want to go low like this then I'll do it also. I think there are a type of people who have been hand held to the notion that engaging in underage relationships is morally wrong but never came to that conclusion on their own through a sincere understanding of why. Hence people like you put this superficial asthetic of being offput by underage relationships from adults. You should be offput by it but people like you don't know WHY. it's just something you were told and never understood why. And those type of people are more prone to finding themselves caught in a underage relationship because they never understood the root reasons why it's morally wrong for a 26 year old for example to have a relationship with a 17 year old. People who don't understand the "why" are more prone to hypocrisy
There is the moral side and there is the legal side, I think most people are more afraid of the legal side and now backlash from social media. The word grooming. For me to be approaching a 16 or 17 year she better be out of this world, because the risks are too high. To be adult meaning you have to get urself up to speed on these things and not just be falling head over heels for 17 year old no matter how great she is.
I have no idea. I just know grown dudes who are attracted to 14 year olds are the definition of a pedo.
As an act of peace, can we get back on topic? I'm sure you guys can go dig up the right threads on the D&D if you really want to talk about Paul Pelosi or about the morality of a young adult wanting to have sexual relations with a <17 teenager. My bad for reacting to Reeko's post, I know I was part of this steering in another direction.
I can hold both positions, it's not one or the other. I get why it is predatory, you don't need to assume that I don't get it just because I am not physically attracted to children. I understand and agree with your point about WHY it is morally wrong while also holding the position that the physical attraction is not the "default state of men."
I compare it to extreme anti-lgbt preachers and activists who eventually get caught in some gat bighr club performing oral sex on another dude. Their understanding of why homosexuality is immoral is based on authority rather than morality same with people who can't express any type of nuance on the conversation of underage relationships and why they are morally wrong. The authority has hamned down their throats that being gay is wrong and therefore You are still a piece of ****. You said you read the context of my comment that reeko posted and you got out of that I was trying to defend underage relationships? In a discussion of why I think homeschooling networks are predatory to teenage girls in male patriarchal communities? What the **** context did you read?
I’m sorry it got off topic, it’s just weird to me that a racist and a pedo are the two biggest kpj apologists, wait that’s actually totally predictable and not weird at all.
Do you know why I said that? Because sexual abuse of teenage girls is at a industrial scale in religious communities where the concept of "wives should obey their husbands" is our into literal practice which creates a community were the males in the community have zero accountability and isolate teenage girls away from modern society creating a ramaotn industrial size scale of abuse towards teenage girls and you are trying to get out of that that im advocating for some type of pedophilia So no I don't think you actually understand the reasons. Society has merely conditioned you to not accept it which is good but I wish you understand the root reasons why as it will make you less prone to hypocrisy on the matter.
You sure are triggered man. Go take a break from the forums or something. I did not accuse you of that ****. I even stated that I didn't even think of pedophilia when I read that. The whole morality **** I'm stating came after the fact that was your response to the Harold poster. That's it. I'm not accusing you of anything.
