Donald Trump in December 2020 literally installed Jeffery Clark as acting AG of USA and his main duty given to him by trump was find ways to overturn the election. He even endorsed the idea of sending us Marshall's to seize voting machines. Folks seem to have brain rot and magically forget what weaponizing the doj actually looks like. There's not one shred of evidence that biden was ever involved in Weiss investigation. According to folks @Invisible Fan Biden is now responsible for what Trump nominees do under his watch. Both sides right?
https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cwsf4BZOl-8/?igshid=NzZhOTFlYzFmZQ== If biden keeps this energy, he will get my vote.
in the Bidenomic thread Invisible made the false claim that the US economy took less time to recover from the Depression than from the pandemic facts are, it tooks 10 years for the US economy to recover from the depression; ~~~ 2 years for the pandemic In the inflaton thread Invisible claims that the Fed is gonna wreck its balance sheet even tho he had also posted that which contradicts his convenient claim about wrecking the balance sheet In the climate change thread Invisible made the false claims that there have been bailouts under Biden's watch facts are there have been several bank failures, which are separate and distinct from bailouts
He did the same thing in Ukr thread where he claimed biden left ukr out to dry and we abandoned them before the war. Then he claimed biden bailed out the failed banks. Folks just make **** up and lie on the fly
Saudis are all in on for trump and it's never been more obvious @rocketsjudoka . Either biden issues a export ban and gives the middle finger to Europe or he allows Saudi to control gas prices and that brings us trump. As long as this UKR war drags on these are the only 2 options. Bidens obsession over Europe is going destroy his presidency.
I think it is suspicious as **** Saudi Arabia gave Jared 2Billion to invest when he has no investment experience. Especially, when their Sovereign Fund board recommended against it, but here we are.
Bush, trump, and Obama all used pseudonyms. Its hilarious how the right is thinks that is somehow a smoking gun. The Biden folks turned over all those emails voluntarily that had the pseudonyms. This isn't some ground breaking news
It's amazing how much damage Reagan did and people thought he was a savior of some kind... https://soapboxie.com/us-politics/21reasonsReaganwasaterriblepresident T_Man
One of the WORST Presidents in this countries history - people loved him and he ****ed the country up big time. DD
but Jared has a history of investing in RE at the height of the RE boom in nyc, in 2007 666 5th Street, NYC, , The Story of the Kushner family and its deal(s) with the devil TL-DR Summary -Kushner properties purchased 666 Fifth Avenue in 2007 -Reports from 2007 to 2018 were that this was a project of Jared Kushner -In 2018, Kushner's father said it was actually all his idea -The property has been a boondoggle from the beginning, never bringing in revenue above expenses -Mortgage debt is due in 2019 -Prior to Trump presidency, Kushner family tried every avenue to get an investor. No one was interested. American banks rejected any solicitations for help, foreign banks wouldn't even take meetings with the family about the property -After securing the election, Jared Kushner divested himself personally with his father assuming full control -Jared was still involved in meetings regarding the property -Charles Kushner met with the Qataris about bailing out the building after the Chinese said "no". The Qataris also said "no." -Kushner denied the meeting took place until a source from Qatar confirmed it. Charles Kushner then claimed it was one meeting and was him saying "no" to Qatar. It was later confirmed there were two meetings with Qatar being the one to deny Mr. Kushner -Weeks after this meeting, a blockade was initiated of Qatar by their neighbors. The US Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, immediately condemned the blockade and said the US stood with their ally Qatar. -Less than an hour later, the president of the United States undercut this statement and condemned Qatar, calling them terrorists -The Qatar government considered cooperating with Special Counsel Robert Mueller as well as the Eastern District of NY, both of whom are investigating Mr. Kushner's financial dealings, by sharing evidence they claimed would indicate that Jared Kushner was punishing them for not bailing out the building. Ultimately they declined to cooperate. -Early April 2018: Vornado, the other partner in the building announces that a mystery party has stepped in to give the Kushner family the money needed to both refinance the debt AND buyout Vornado, making the Kushners 100% owner of the building. They would not reveal who the partner was. -April 9th: President Trump meets with the Emir of Qatar in the White House and calls him a "friend" and an "ally." -In late April, the new Secretary of State Mike Pompeo began calling on Saudia Arabia to end it's blockade of Qatar. -May 17th: It's revealed that the secret partner bailing out the Kushner's is a Candian investment firm with direct ties to? You guessed it...Qatar. Prior to this there was literally ZERO interest from ANYONE in helping the Kushner's with this property.
depends on your perspective Rating the Presidents of the United States, 1789-2000: A Survey of Scholars in History, Political Science, and Law https://fedsoc.org/commentary/publi...scholars-in-history-political-science-and-law
https://preview.redd.it/laura-ingraham-says-the-democratic-platform-is-pot-p*rn-and-v0-kjtx364l8xlb1.jpg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=ee96eaf59c587eee12d5e3698cfc283eca054f66
Oh my. I seem to have gathered an invisible fan fan club, where I'm expected to always be right. If I'm not, then it's a conspiratorial agenda. Stay frosty, folks I don't remember this, and don't really care to debate. I could be wrong, or it's a typical misparse by you. You can provide a link for ***** and giggles, but only folk on an x-y axis will consider this a lie. You left the part out where I wrote (it doesn't count) because you don't understand what that could mean or don't care. If the Fed maintains a high interest rate policy for longer, they will feel pain for the duration of those years. The Fed's autonomy and blind worship will come in question if it's not giving back to the Treasury for its policies. Is that a lie or a natural debate with several responses where I took the time to respond to you? Here again, it's debatable. In that same thread: “Bailout,” yelled senior economics fellow at Brookings Institution, Aaron Klein, during a phone interview with ABC News. “That’s what it is - plain and simple.” Klein spent over a decade working in government, including his time as chief economist of the Senate Banking. During that time, he worked on the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) – a $700 billion government bailout authorized by Congress in October of 2008. Klein’s point is that the depositors being made whole beyond the original $250,000 guarantee are, in essence, getting bailed out. Everyone who had less than that in their accounts was already guaranteed their money back by the Fed, he noted. “If you lined up 20 Americans in a room, the 19th richest person will have – based on the average – about $69,000 in their bank account,” noted Klein. “Very few Americans have more than $250,000 in a single bank.” Per the bank’s own description, SVB catered its services to venture capitalists (VCs), start-up and leaders in the tech industry – many of whom could be considered financially “well-off”. “VCs should say thank you,” wrote NYT’s and CNBC’s Andrew Ross Sorkin on Twitter. “It is a bailout,” he wrote. “Not like 2008. But it is a bailout of the venture capital community + their portfolio companies (their investments). That’s the depositor base of SVB.” If the government is stepping in to guarantee these bank customers their money beyond the $250,000 guarantee, many are left wondering where that money is coming from and how this is not considered a bailout. And again, your last response claimed "our generals didn't know" what Ukraine was doing. That's the Fog of War buddy. They acted with what they did know and what they thought was Ukraine was toast. Which means we would've abandoned them at that time. If Kabul hoisted some miracle resistance in it's last days, we wouldn't hold them out to dry either, but we did what we did with what we knew and what was happening. Just because y'all don't like the answer or response doesn't mean I'm misrepresenting or lying in Debate and Discussion. I'm fairly open to admitting when I'm wrong. Yall are just different and special.
Biden literally sent the CIA chief to Kyiv and tried getting zelensky to issue a general mobilization and he refused and his folks called biden a war monger. USA isnt an enemey for there to be "fog of war" or whatever bs you wanna claim. Biden cant stick a gun to Zelensky head and force him to do something. The CIA AGAINST the wishes of Zelensky still trained secret group of commandos that ultimately won the fight against the russians at the airport at the beginning of the war. IF it wasnt for this special group of commandos UKR would've been in RU hands. Your narrative that Biden left UKR for toast is literally just disinformation and lies. https://news.yahoo.com/exclusive-se...v-prepare-for-russian-invasion-090052743.html You also lie all the time in the other thread
So what if they're training commandos. The public knew we were sending aid and arms to Russia since Trump's impeachment. The US thought Kyiv would fall and fighting would turn into resistance. Not sure why you're insistent on this. It's weird and a bit OCD-ish.
How original. Someone already make that, "joke" but yea, why even have threads with certain topics? Let just not talk about the substance of a matter lets just "WhAtABouTiSm" everything.
