Where Does It Say The Supreme Court Is Supposed To Be Balanced?

Of course the side that has the majority aren't worried about how right it is in the eyes of the constitution. U can bet you @$$ that if liberals somehow stack the court, we would hear the btching for days of how unconstitutional it is by conservatives.

In an ideal world the 9 justices should b unbias and uncorruptable. The conservatives don't like that so they decided to jam pack the courts with ultra conservatives. U can push the country back into the stone age with a 6-3 majority

 

Probably not considering the Founding Fathers were against political parties.

 

Maybe some wokies would suggest affirmative action for the Supreme Court.

 

See: Clarence Thomas. He was wholly unqualified to be nominated. He was a judge for all of 1.5 years before being nominated.

 

Most United States Supreme Court Justices Have Lacked Prior Judicial Experience

https://law.marquette.edu/facultybl...he best known,of great Supreme Court justices.

​

 

Constitution doesn't say it has to be balanced. It also doesn't say you shouldn't pack the court with additional justices in a naked power grab, which is the obvious remedy when you hold the Presidency and Senate but are losing in the supreme court. It is one of those unspoken norms that Trump was always breaking: keep a 5-4 balance and don't pack the court. I won't reproach Biden for refraining, but it was Republicans who broke spades and he would have been justified in my eyes to pack it.