Liberals are corrupt, hateful, immoral and taking the country in the wrong direction

If you think gay people are immoral for being gay then you deserve to be demonized.

Which, as the poll shows, the majority of republicans DO think this.

 

Do you think Muslims "deserve to be demonized" (I don't, but if you were consistent, you would)? Do you want to see some much more shocking polls?

 

I support these gays:

https://www.gaysagainstgroomers.com/

 

Nothing.

You are the one implying a connection.

 

I'm no fan of religion and religion is not an excuse to be hateful towards a group of people. If you are hateful towards a group of people you (and your belief system) deserve to be demonized and criticized for that view. I don't GAF about your religious texts, the same texts that were used to tolerate and justify slavery.

Republicans, the majority of them, think being gay is immoral. So yes, their belief system deserves to be called out. It's not a few, it's the majority now. It wasn't this way literally a year ago. What changed?

I'm not implying the connection. YOU did that funnily enough. Read the post again, I'm telling you that poll had nothing to do with children. Again, nothing to do with children so I'll ask again...

So why was there a sharp decline in acceptance towards homosexual relationships?

 

Cool. Always use a minority of that group to drown out how the majority of that group feels.

Same tactics used for civil rights, the exact same.

 

the message that makes sense stands whether it’s a minority of a group I would respond

 

The only folks that support grooming are hiding behind the cross.


Arizona court upholds clergy privilege in child abuse case
https://apnews.com/article/mormon-church-child-sex-abuse-e02ae4470a5a53cbeb9aa146ff2762ac

 

I mean why do they even exist, do you think the majority of non-straight people are for grooming or something?

It's like starting a 'Men Against Rape' group. Well duh, the majority of men (and people in general) are against rape.

Group just exists as the 'gay' friend for Republicans when the majority of the LGBTQ+ community feels discriminated against. History shows when a minority group feels this way there usually is a good reason for it.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-leicestershire-63785679
No cross here apparently

 

I think the evidence of inappropriate exposure happens often in drag shows as has been depicted many times

 

How does that support grooming?

A Christian pastor having sex with children doesn’t support grooming anymore than a transsexual having sex with a child.

What supports the grooming is changing the laws to enact a two tiered system where Christians will handle their rampant child diddling in house….

…. public school teachers don’t have the same benefit as a pastor.

 

But children pageants that are so popular amongst your kind doesn’t?

 

What changed?

I don't know for sure what changed, but I would not be surprised if it has to do with the aggressive nature of "Pride" (whatever that means) being shoved down people's throats. It's one thing to be tolerant and accepting of other people's personal choices, which I believe is what the majority of people in Western societies nowadays are, but if you basically constantly get bombarded with HAVING TO CELEBRATE certain lifestyles, that's different from just quietly and calmly accepting and tolerating that these lifestyles exist.

Like, nobody in other NBA cities cares much about the Rockets one way or another, but if you forced everyone in all other NBA cities to have a ROCKETS MONTH and they would get bombarded with ROCKETS PRIDE stuff and if they say they don't like it, they are FASCISTS, then what do you think is going to happen?

Right.

People are going to start being anti-Rockets.

That's what is likely happening here.

For you to say that people who are not fans of homosexuality need to be DEMONIZED is quite an extreme statement. There are many shades of grey here. One can be perfectly tolerant and accepting of homosexuals, but for religious or whatever reasons still think that that lifestyle is not something to aspire to. (I am not one of these people, but I think it is wrong for you to try to DICTATE what people are allowed to think OR ELSE...THEY HAVE TO BE DEMONIZED. That kind of mindset is intolerant in itself.)

Now that you have been harping on that poll, where were you when I posted these polls?

https://www.pewresearch.org/religio...s-muslims-religion-politics-society-morality/

And by the way, you want to DICTATE that people must not be allowed to THINK that homosexuality is immoral, but what about entire countries where homosexuality is sanctioned with the DEATH PENALTY? That's a whole other level you should be much more outraged about.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ere-homosexuality-may-be-punished-by-death-2/

Here are the 10 countries where homosexuality may be punishable by death:

Yemen: According to the 1994 penal code, married men can be sentenced to death by stoning for homosexual intercourse. Unmarried men face whipping or one year in prison. Women face up to seven years in prison.

Iran: In accordance with sharia law, homosexual intercourse between men can be punished by death, and men can be flogged for lesser acts such as kissing. Women may be flogged.

Mauritania: Muslim men engaging in homosexual sex can be stoned to death, according to a 1984 law, though none have been executed so far. Women face prison.

Nigeria: Federal law classifies homosexual behavior as a felony punishable by imprisonment, but several states have adopted sharia law and imposed a death penalty for men. A law signed in early January makes it illegal for gay people countrywide to hold a meeting or form clubs.

Qatar: Sharia law in Qatar applies only to Muslims, who can be put to death for extramarital sex, regardless of sexual orientation.

Saudi Arabia: Under the country’s interpretation of sharia law, a married man engaging in sodomy or any non-Muslim who commits sodomy with a Muslim can be stoned to death. All sex outside of marriage is illegal.

Afghanistan: The Afghan Penal Code does not refer to homosexual acts, but Article 130 of the Constitution allows recourse to be made to sharia law, which prohibits same-sex sexual activity in general. Afghanistan’s sharia law criminalizes same-sex sexual acts with a maximum of the death penalty. No known cases of death sentences have been meted out since the end of Taliban rule in 2001.

Somalia: The penal code stipulates prison, but in some southern regions, Islamic courts have imposed sharia law and the death penalty.

Sudan: Three-time offenders under the sodomy law can be put to death; first and second convictions result in flogging and imprisonment. Southern parts of the country have adopted more lenient laws.

United Arab Emirates: Lawyers in the country and other experts disagree on whether federal law prescribes the death penalty for consensual homosexual sex or only for rape. In a recent Amnesty International report, the organization said it was not aware of any death sentences for homosexual acts. All sexual acts outside of marriage are banned.

Guess what all these 10 countries have in common...

I tried to answer your question above. But I am starting to think you have some weird problem with logic? Nothing in these polls was about children, yet you keep talking about children. Clearly, you made that connection, not me.

 

Grooming is wrong whether it’s woke or not

examples of grooming concerns as cited from gays against groomers
The mutilation and sterilization of minors
Drag and pride events involving children
Queer & Gender Theory being taught in the classroom
Propagandizing youth with LGBTQ+ media

 

And we can go after those people in those situations without generalizing an entire group.

Do we want to, for example, claim that white people are all racists because of videos of some people being racists in stores or somethin or should we just laugh at that person in the video, realize its a unique situation, and direct our criticism towards the person in the video being racist?

I mean like would it surprise me that there could be a drag queen that is also a pedo? Wouldn't surprise me at all, at the same time I wouldn't then go on about how Drag needs to be banned and its inherently sexual blah blah because of a few situations...because yeah, we're not shutting down churches after finding several pedo priests

 

What changed is your constant push to equate homosexuality with pedophilia

 

wtf are you even talking about...you are just making **** up

moron

 

My kind? My pronouns are U-S-A get it right !

 

I’m half expecting him to say “God save the Queen” in response at this point - complete nonsense as expected