Don’t worry…. I won’t tell your family about your incessant posting about homosexuals and transsexuals. I’m sure they have some idea…. I can’t do anything about your browser history….
At least two prosecutors have the balls to indict a former president, but none have balls enough to charge a president's prodigal son? Seems unlikely. Wheels of justice turn slow, so maybe an indictment will eventually come. But I can't believe that the lack of charges against Hunter Biden derives from his impunity.
I can confirm this. Actually, ridiculously slow, all over the world. It's time something is done about that.
It was no accident that the Trump indictments were made the same day as the house members were able to see the Biden / Burisma bribery/corruption evidence. It was timed to bury the Biden story. Kompromat. If you think Hunter was qualified to serve on the Burisma board, you're delusional. And if you don't think Joe was "the big guy", you might want to turn off CNN and get out of your echo chamber.
Again you ask was hunter to be on the board. Why the fk was jared kusher paid 2 BILLION DOLLARS from the saudis?! https://www.marketwatch.com/story/j...vestment-from-saudi-arabia-report-11649700763 He NEVER was a investment banker or had any experience. The Saudi fund manager himself wanted him out by was overruled by MBS. All yall low iq maga are dumb @bigtexxx
internet detectives provide today's update https://www.powerlineblog.com/archi...t-the-bidens-is-on-the-verge-of-exploding.php excerpt: Frustrated by the fact that an unclassified document should be redacted at all, Sen. Chuck Grassley addressed his Senate colleagues on Monday afternoon. Scott reported on his extraordinary remarks here. The Iowa Republican first reminded his colleagues that he has seen the unredacted version and then proceeded to enighten them with some of the missing material. Grassley revealed that “the foreign national who allegedly bribed Joe and Hunter Biden allegedly has audio recordings of his conversations with them. Seventeen total recordings.” He continued: According to the 1023, the foreign national possesses fifteen audio recordings of phone calls between him and Hunter Biden. According to the 1023, the foreign national possesses two audio recordings of phone calls between him and then-Vice President Joe Biden. These recordings were allegedly kept as a sort of insurance policy for the foreign national in case he got into a tight spot. The 1023 also indicates that then-Vice President Joe Biden may have been involved in Burisma employing Hunter Biden. If Grassley is correct, and I can’t imagine he would make these claims publicly if he were not, this is just breathtaking. Last weekend, reports began to trickle out about the identity of the “foreign national.” Most notably, sources told the Washington Examiner that “an FBI record reveals” the Burisma executive who spoke to the CHS was Ukrainian oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky, the company’s owner. Zlochevsky provided Hunter Biden with a highly paid seat on Burisma’s board of directors in April 2014 while his father was serving as President Barack Obama’s “point man” in Ukraine. On Tuesday, RedState reported that, according to a “national security source” who spoke on the condition of anonymity, Zlochevsky “is believed to be an asset of Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) by the United States intelligence community.” The source told RedState that the intelligence community has “a high degree of confidence in their assessment of Zlochevsky as SVR.” Moreover, the source said this “is not a new assessment” and “the intelligence community under Obama knew this, and Obama was briefed on it.” more at the link
Again the funny thing these low iq right wingers always forget is somehow a republican senate committee who was leading the investigation into ukraine RECOMMENDED that the Obama administration fire the prosecutor The European union withheld money from the corrupt ukraine government at the time BEFORE Obama folks ever said a word. All yalls conspiracies always fall face flat
Here is what you are missing. The foreign national is not the whistle-blower. The whistle-blower told the FBI that this foreign national told the whistle-blower there are recordings. The foreign national very well may have told the whistle-blower this. However, the whistle-blower has never seen or heard these recordings. Grassley portrayed the information in the 1023 as being reported by the person who has the recordings. This is absolutely not true.
So you don’t read what the articles you post? Doesn’t reflect well on the poster of the article…. YULE C
