Brian Austin Green…the ex-husband…say this is bullshit. He has no idea who this guy is. https://www.tmz.com/2023/06/10/brian-austin-green-responds-claim-megan-fox-dresses-sons/
Some folks just can't read. This guy took an article and paraphrase it incorrectly Guidance 'will go down in safeguarding history' as hormone-suppressing drugs will not be routinely recommended at two new clinics in England. First of its in England where they have their own certain standards and guidelines. Not every kid needs to b recommended hormone blockers, most or all kids should b case by case. Like how the us is trying to avoid routinely recommending opioid for every pain doesn't mean they are banned. We should b following the fda for this sort of stuff
None of the leftists can explain away why they are so desperate to get in front of young children. There is no innocent motivation behind this.
Pretty easy to defend, child abuse includes emotional abuse. If your child says they are gay and you are telling your child that actually, no they are not, being gay is evil, etc, it could be considered emotional abuse that could help lead your child to a mental illness that could be life or death. In the same vein if your child thinks they are the opposite gender and you are denying it in an emotionally abusive way then yes, it would be emotional abuse. I doubt the bill works as the propagandist tweeter described, it takes a lot for a parent to lose custody of a child and what is being suggested here is that this could be a factor for why someone might lose their child. Not THE factor. The bills spokesperson clearly states that but the propagandist here leaves that part out conveniently. This is a bad take as well. Parents do have a say in what their children moral values are but not the only say. The society those children grow up in also have a say. Your side agrees with this as well as they are always banging away that treating trans children as trans is child abuse as well. Do you agree with that? If so then you too agree that society also has a say in the moral values of its children. This has always been the case too and its been the case of every human society that has ever existed. That's part of what 'culture' is. Racism is a PERFECT example of this. We were completely fine with having teachers in public schools teach the evils of racism in recent history. Teachers could teach about slavery, why its wrong, etc. Some cultures have taught that racism is GOOD and passed that down to their young, America as a culture has decided it is bad and so we've grown to accept that when you say racist things or in general are a racist, you get ostracized for it. Of course America wasn't always like this as culture changes. The rights motivation isn't about kids, its' not 'innocent', it's about changing culture. Nearly every right wing thought leader has very openly said this and I doubt it's going to lead to anything pretty. When Ted Cruz gets flack for criticizing a Ugandan law that makes homosexuality illegal in their country you should wonder if you're on the right side of history here. I'm really starting to worry about you, you to consume A LOT of this transpanic content...like a lot. You ever think of just avoiding it for a week, stepping away from it and allowing your mind a break from it or at least a chance for your mind to think about these issues without any outside interference?
Gotta love the "I'm worried about you" angle when someone calls out crazy leftist ideology. Just like communists in China were "worried about" those who were not in line with the party line.
1. ) You were completely dishonest about the bill in question showing you did 0 research about it. 2. ) You asked for someone to 'defend' the bill and give this trash response. Proving you just look to affirm views you have 0 interest in critically thinking about. Looks like you really are that far gone then. I gave a sincere effort and this was your reply, pretty disappointing. Lesson learned then.
No, the rest of your response was ok, obviously wrong, but you are entitled to your opinion. However, the "I'm worried about you" tactic is weak.
No, you're completely wrong about the bill and should do more research instead of just blindly retweeting someone shooting out misinformation about it. People should really try to steelman their arguments, if you did so you would have realized that the people you were linking were not being honest or had no idea what they were even talking about and likely wouldn't have posted it here as it is a nothing burger in reality. You've called people evil, hateful, etc for being on the left, have you not? Honestly, browsing this forum the past few days all I've seen is you retweeting transpanic stuff, yeah, I express concern about anyone going deep down any internet rabbithole, I've always been consistent about that. People really should step away from twitter for a week or two and watch how their views on any subject become a lot more moderate and honestly a lot more sane. You can think its a tactic or whatever but its honestly how I feel. It's not good for discourse. I mean obviously it's not, you posted about that bill multiple times as if its some kind of gotcha when the tweeters have completely misrepresented it entirely and so now thanks to their tweets a bunch of people think that in California you can have your child taken away from you because you don't affirm their gender. How is this good for discourse?
