Liberals are corrupt, hateful, immoral and taking the country in the wrong direction

If it’s in front of me that’s a different story if it’s in front of children no way is that appropriate posture

 

OP hasn't been on anyone's minds since page 1 lmao

 

I certainly believe it was a clown posture to highlight the posture which is indefensible despite your best efforts

 

This person literally just sat down with legs uncrossed while picking up something from the floor with two layers of additional clothing underneath the dress. No I sincerely doubt you would rage at a woman with two layers of clothing sitting down with their legs uncrossed in front of children.

 

You can believe it's a clown posture. You can't change the reality of the intent of the person editing this image and their purpose was to make people assume it's exposed genitals.

 

Skirt shortened with spandex underwear showing in front of children would be similarly deemed inappropriate

 

What those children physically saw was equivalent of a dude wearing skinny jeans sitting uncrossed in front of children.

 

I honestly can't be bothered to read any of this

 

You are bothered enough to input your thoughts prematurely.

 

What they actually saw was a dude wearing a shortened skirt wearing spandex skin tight underwear exposed in a inappropriate posture

 

Let's pretend they weren't wearing a dress but just leggings with briefs underneath. Are the children being exposed? Visually what's the difference between that and normal gym attire you see everyday with dudes including me wearing shorts that are like 3 inches above the knee?

 

If this supposedly was all it was lol, then would it be fine to not wear the skirt?

 

“Let’s pretend” is the problem

 

I notice you refuse to acknowledge the additional layer that is obviously underneath where you can't even outline if their is a bulge.

Like dude you literally made a comment about making an assumption that the the person has a dick and balls. So even you can't figure out if they even have junk there or not yet these kids are exposed?

If you can't even tell if there is junk down there or not how is there exposure?

 

So what you are stating is that the third layer of clothing with the skirt is what makes it sexually explicit for children?

 

Wait how certain are you it’s two layers? Plus I don’t care if it’s 3 layers, it is still an inappropriate posture when you consider it is underwear and a skirt as outerwear …what this posture shows to me is not considering whether it’s appropriate in front of the children

 

Generally having a shortened skirt with skin tight spandex underwear in that posture is sexually explicit and inappropriate

 

So the state of sitting down uncrossed is inherently exposure to children?



It's obvious with the darker outline around the crotch area that resembles the outline of briefs that they have some sort of briefs underneath.

And yes they more than likely have dick and balls as these people are doing drag and aren't trans I believe. So the fact that you and I have no idea or can make out whether they have them kinda defeats your entire narrative of exposure.

 

So if someone wore a skirt but with skinny jeans underneath or yoga pants, the nature of grabbing down to get something while sitting down with your legs uncrossed is inherently sexual?

 

Also if no one mentioned it and that original image without the emoji face never was shown would you even assume the person was wearing briefs underneath or just assume its shear leggings and nothing else?