Liberals are corrupt, hateful, immoral and taking the country in the wrong direction

How did texxx's welcome back roast turn into another ATW trans thread?

 

The uncensored version showed what appeared to be skin color blended spandex underwear…not “shorts” If it was a non LGBTQ, let’s say it was a straight female in this manner …This would still be inappropriate in front of children

 

All I know is if you've lost @MadMax you need to stop and rethink your choices.

 

Are stretchy yoga pants censored on twitter?

 

Wait we went from shorts to stretchy yoga pants? Is this what you are falling back on? Is this a retreat and reconstitute legal strategy you sly dog you

 

Let’s say …it’s skin tight stretchy yoga shorts under the skirt just to make everyone happy…would that be an appropriate pose in front of children whether it’s a LGBTQ or straight …the answer is still no

Does anyone have kids here? I am curious if I can replicate the same pose in front of your children and that would not be a problem with skin tight stretchy yoga shorts exposed with legs spread wide and free

 

We really just want you to admit what your "family values" actually are instead of playing this charade.

 

Notice the specific question I'm asking. I made no claim of whether this is inappropriate for children. I'm asking if stretched leggings have censorship in the crotch area when that type picture is shared on twitter usually? Do you understand why I'm asking this? I'm figuring out if the purpose of the emoji face on the crotch area was sincere censorship or a method to illicit rage because anyone who just doom scrolls down during their daily trans hate feed hour wouldn't be intellectually curious enough to do further research and just automatically assume its a trans person showing exposed genitals to children because of the emoji face. If it's the latter then it's clear to me this isn't s sincere concern for children but just a method of propaganda.

 

Yes @fchowd0311 we get you have no children and as a consequence do not care what’s inappropriate for children

 

Notice the specific question I'm asking. I made no claim of whether this is inappropriate for children. I'm asking if stretched leggings have censorship in the crotch area when that type picture is shared on twitter usually? Do you understand why I'm asking this? I'm figuring out if the purpose of the emoji face on the crotch area was sincere censorship or a method to illicit rage because anyone who just doom scrolls down during their daily trans hate feed hour wouldn't be intellectually curious enough to do further research and just automatically assume its a trans person showing exposed genitals to children because of the emoji face. If it's the latter then it's clear to me this isn't s sincere concern for children but just a method of propaganda.

 

Also anyone with common sense would realize that the emoji clown face was there to highlight how the exposed open leg posture with a hyper shortened skirt and a skin tight spandex underwear was a clown act

 

If what was underneath was spandex, then it's common sense that they put the emoji face there to make people jump to a conclusion that it was exposed genitals fre ballin hence why I'm asking if stretched leggings have emoji faces on the crotch area in other contexts of people wearing stretched leggings that form fit around their butt and crotch.

Especially if you know how most people consume Twitter by just doom scrolling down for dopamine hits, the obvious intent was to illicit an initial reaction that they are exposed genitals.

 

No one would immediately assume they are exposed genitals : Also anyone with common sense would realize that the emoji clown face was there to highlight how the exposed open leg posture with a hyper shortened skirt and a skin tight spandex underwear was a clown act - I’ll say it again

 

I'm pretty sure 90% of the people who scrolled down to that picture especially considering the type of people who follow those type of accounts automatically assumed it was a exposed genitals. That was the intent of placing an emoji face there. You know it. Everyone here knows it.

 

Honestly the first thing that came to my mind was wow how freaking inappropriate to posture that way wearing that attire regardless of the underwear. I am pretty sure others felt the same way…Granted if he was exposing genitals I would’ve been more exponentially mindblown…

 

No. You including everyone else who follows these type accounts automatically assumed it was exposed genitals or cleared the baseline threshold of naiveness to understand that the purpose is to make people assume it's exposed for propaganda purposes.

 

If the picture is self evident without the emoji that this is wrong why is there an emoji if the genitals weren't exposed? Is the message not conveyed well enough without the emoji? It doesn't hit as hard? Doesn't garner as much rage?

If that's the case then yes that means it was for propaganda purposes.

 

Because the posture is obviously a clown act inappropriate for children. The emoji serves to highlight the posture which again is inappropriate(i.e. the wide opened leg positioning in direct view of children with a extremely short skirt exposing spandex underwear) whether it’s a straight female or a queer person

 

If the posture is self evident that it's disgusting then why is the emoji needed?

 

7 pages in 6 hours

dominating thoughts and emotions