Fabulous maybe? That looks like a public elementary (6th grade and under) school, to which I'd say that's a little over the top if not entirely unwarranted.
Apply yourself, it's right in front of you. C'mon you can't be this stupid, I know you want to initiate an argument because you are hell bent on making excuses to make this kind of stuff seem ok and normal, but I am not going to indulge you on this one.
No. And believe me, me not answering is not the "a ha!" moment that you think it is, it exposes YOU. I hope you are intelligent enough to see that, but not likely.
Soon "sharing is caring" taught to kindergartners is going to be seen as grooming children for communism.
How long will it take for you to realize these people don't hold any positions based on intellectual curiosity and sincere concern? .they turned trans people into a meme and that's their ideology now. There isn't much deeper thought than that.
Seems like the trans hesitancy is more and more blending in to just some gay hesitancy. I think those who are less excited about trans stuff need to make sure they don't accidentally find themselves too closely aligned with the anti-gay crowd. Also, I think many people might be overestimating the influence that teachers have on kids. For example, I think nearly all of my teachers were religious and though I was at a public school I was often taught parts of the bible as literal truth. Yet here I sit, entirely non-religious. I am very far from a parenting expert and I might change my mind or at least adjust as I get more experience, but I often remind my kids that sometimes adults are wrong. I can be wrong, mom can be wrong, teachers can be wrong, police can be wrong, etc. Not that none of these people can be trusted; just that you always need to assess things for yourself. So my hope is that with this approach my kids will be less susceptible to demagoguing adults of any kind. We'll see.
Oh I'm aware. I just felt like this was a prime opportunity to demonstrate to the rest of the internet (hi lurkers!) what we already knew about certain posters here. This one did not disappoint.
You confirmed again that your argument here is simply your moral outrage and using the government to push your morals onto others. You do not consider actual evidence for outcomes, which is what the standard of care is based on.
I honestly feel that the general population hasn't done enough research to b restricting/banning gender transition surgery. Atw crying genital multiation is an example of these folks. 18 is such an arbitrary number with the age of consent ranging from 16 to 18, what's next making it only appropiate at 21? Banning it all together? There is no science to restricting the surgery to b done only after age 18 aside from the government stripping away parental rights simply because they don't agree with it. If the parents did the research, the child is willing to undergo it and the medical field has deem it appropriate, the government and right wing nuts should back the fk down.
Here I'll post it again for ya, you'll have to figure this one out for yourself kid. You are willfully ignorant. You are the equivalent of a reporter standing in front of a burning building and saying the protests are mostly peaceful.
It's a simple question that you claim to know the answer to, yet lack the courage or conviction to say. Try again.
That's no longer an option in 17 states (20 if not for court injunctions). 6 more states are considering banning gender affirming care for adolescents.
Do you understand that there are things children cannot legally consent to? And do you understand why?
"gender affirming care" is a misnomer The correct term would be "chemical or surgical attempted sex appearance change, permanently reducing or removing reproductive capabilities".
