1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Who is John Durham

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by basso, Sep 14, 2020.

  1. Mr.Scarface

    Mr.Scarface Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    13,048
    Likes Received:
    8,352
    Who is John Durham? Another MF'er the Republicans wasted Taxpayer money on, in the hope he would "own" Liberals while continuing to allow Republicans to swallow Trump's scrotum. They swallowed Trump's scrotum without "owning" Liberals. Hence, another nothing burger.
     
    FranchiseBlade likes this.
  2. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,279
    Likes Received:
    9,245
    Hillary Clinton will never be president.
     
  3. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,279
    Likes Received:
    9,245
  4. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,279
    Likes Received:
    9,245
  5. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,279
    Likes Received:
    9,245
  6. Os Trigonum

    Os Trigonum Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    81,378
    Likes Received:
    121,728
    that's what CNN is saying online as well

    Screenshot 2023-05-15 at 5.35.19 PM.png
     
    cml750 and basso like this.
  7. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,167
    Likes Received:
    48,334
    This report seems like Durham restating his opinion rather than any deep finding of fact. Durham can say what he wants but his failure to get more than one conviction and two losses shows how little legal weight was behind it. It also should be noted that the Senate’s bipartisan report and DOJ IG contradicts Durham’s finding.
     
    Nook, dobro1229, adoo and 4 others like this.
  8. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,279
    Likes Received:
    9,245
    couldn't keep it.

     
    cml750 and No Worries like this.
  9. gifford1967

    gifford1967 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2003
    Messages:
    8,302
    Likes Received:
    4,646
    lol
     
  10. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,782
    Likes Received:
    20,441
    That much is laid bare in the report and investigation in which Durham was o fer 2 in court. Federal prosecutors have something like a 90% conviction rate but with all the resources and years of time devoted to the report they couldn't win one case. But they did get a guilty plea.

    I'm glad that they uncovered some bad warrants. But it's just a lot of time and millions of dollars to do that.
     
    mdrowe00 likes this.
  11. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,782
    Likes Received:
    20,441
    Yes. It was a four year millions of dollars Op-ed.
     
    Nook, dobro1229 and mdrowe00 like this.
  12. mtbrays

    mtbrays Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2007
    Messages:
    8,603
    Likes Received:
    7,988
    Lol
     
  13. No Worries

    No Worries Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    32,773
    Likes Received:
    20,534
    The Durham Investigation was an abuse of power by a sitting President to assuage his injured, fragile ego.
     
    FranchiseBlade likes this.
  14. larsv8

    larsv8 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    21,663
    Likes Received:
    13,916
    What is she talking about?

    The investigation was about Russia interfering in our elections.
     
  15. No Worries

    No Worries Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    32,773
    Likes Received:
    20,534
    Lest we forget, Trump went after Hillary ...

    The DOJ’s Hillary Clinton Investigation Has Been a Bust

    After more than two years, an inquiry into the Clinton Foundation and Clinton’s tenure at State is nearly done—and there’s reportedly absolutely nothing to show for it.

    JANUARY 9, 2020

    Back in 2017, buoyed by President Donald Trump’s calls for investigations into “Crooked Hillary & the Dems,” the Justice Department launched an inquiry into Hillary Clinton and Republicans' pet conspiracy theories about her and her career. Then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions asked U.S. Attorney John Huber to look into concerns that the FBI hadn't fully pursued cases related to the Clinton Foundation, as well as Clinton's tenure as Secretary of State, including the baseless “Uranium One” conspiracy theory championed by conservatives. Now, Huber is finally almost finished with his much-vaunted Clinton investigation—and, unsurprisingly, there isn't really anything to show for it.

    The Washington Post reported Thursday that after continuing on for more than two years, Huber's investigation “has effectively ended with no tangible results.” After combing through documents and conferring with federal law enforcement officials looking into the Clinton Foundation in Little Rock, Arkansas, the Post reports that Huber has “found nothing worth pursuing,” let alone any criminal charges. The U.S. attorney has not yet officially reported any results to the Justice Department, however, and the inquiry is technically still ongoing. But officials cited by the Post say that Huber's years-long investigation has by this point “largely finished”—and with nothing to show for it.

    Despite Republicans' long insistence on Clinton's wrongdoing—and Trump's favorite “lock her up” rallying cry—the fact that the Huber investigation has reportedly been a bust doesn't seem to come as much surprise to those inside the Justice Department itself. Senior Justice officials cited by the Post said that the investigation had largely been viewed as little more than a way to appease Trump and his Republican allies, and officials expected the inquiry was “unlikely to lead to anything of significance.” “We didn’t expect much of it, and neither did [Huber],” one source told the Post. “And as time went on, a lot of people just forgot about it.”

    The news of the DOJ's fruitless investigation comes just a few months after the State Department completed its own investigation into Clinton's emails and use of a private server, which found that while 38 individuals did commit 91 security violations in emails sent to or from the private server, ultimately the server largely wasn't used for transmitting classified information. “While there were some instances of classified information being inappropriately introduced into an unclassified system in furtherance of expedience, by and large, the individuals interviewed were aware of security policies and did their best to implement them in their operations,” a report on the investigation said. “There was no persuasive evidence of systemic, deliberate mishandling of classified information.” Of course, Clinton being cleared of wrongdoing by Trump's own executive branch isn't about to stop the president from bashing Hillary nonetheless. (Never mind the fact that six of Trump's own associates have been convicted of crimes, or that private email use has reportedly been rampant throughout the Trump administration.) Less than an hour after the Post report came out, Trump was back on the campaign trail attacking Hillary, repeating his favorite 2016 talking points to a crowd of supporters—Clinton's innocence be damned. “Crooked Hillary—you should lock her up, I'll tell you,” Trump told supporters.
     
    FranchiseBlade likes this.
  16. Astrodome

    Astrodome Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2015
    Messages:
    12,964
    Likes Received:
    14,906
    Everyone knew it was a hoax. Hillary wanted Trump to get peed on so she made it happen.
     
  17. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,279
    Likes Received:
    9,245
    if you're grading on convictions, you've taken the wrong test.
     
    cml750 likes this.
  18. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,279
    Likes Received:
    9,245
    no.
     
    cml750 likes this.
  19. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,279
    Likes Received:
    9,245
    no.
     
    cml750 likes this.
  20. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,279
    Likes Received:
    9,245
    Hillary Clinton will never be president.
     

Share This Page