1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Chicago locals not happy about bussed immigrant housing plan

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Kim, May 7, 2023.

  1. Kim

    Kim Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 1999
    Messages:
    9,286
    Likes Received:
    4,178
    Agreed, but as the article posted by Buck shows, it's both political kabuki and good for migrants at the same time. The migrant non-profits dislike Abbott, but are all pro-bussing because we just don't have the resources in Texas border communities where the feds release everyone.
    https://www.texasmonthly.com/news-politics/case-for-busing-migrants-greg-abbott-texas/

    And playing on jingoism works with black activists in Chicago worrying about a few thousand and also works with suburban whites in New York worrying about just a few hundred. Same with the Tejanos hating on the Venezualans in Texas. People suck, but that's how it's almost always been, almost everywhere. Again, Hawaii is shipping homeless people back to the mainland, lol.

     
    pgabriel and Nook like this.
  2. Kim

    Kim Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 1999
    Messages:
    9,286
    Likes Received:
    4,178
    The labor shortage is real. There are overall good stats, but when the distrubtion is uneven.
    https://www.uschamber.com/workforce...s-labor-shortage-the-most-impacted-industries

    It's actually a pro-asylum argment, because people who are awaiting immigration court dates are allowed to work. If there is no labor shortage, then that feeds into the "they tuk ur jobs" rhetoric, but there actually is a labor shortage.
     
  3. astros123

    astros123 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2013
    Messages:
    13,909
    Likes Received:
    11,455
    @Commodore



    "
    Hundreds of U.S. asylum officers were trained on how to enforce the restriction on Tuesday and the regulation is expected to be published on Wednesday, less than 48 hours before Title 42 is set to expire, according to people familiar with the effort who requested anonymity to discuss internal plans.

    The regulation, which is expected to be challenged in federal court, will be a dramatic shift in asylum policy, disqualifying migrants from U.S. protection if they fail to request refugee status in another country, such as Mexico, on their journey to the southern border."
    USA announced new restrictions today that will go into effect Thursday.
     
    #103 astros123, May 9, 2023
    Last edited: May 9, 2023
  4. StupidMoniker

    StupidMoniker I lost a bet

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2001
    Messages:
    16,172
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    The ones with the meth, cocaine, fentanyl, and heroin are also criminals, they just didn't have a warrant in the United State (or an international warrant, presumably). They are probably gang members (or gang associates) as well, given that's who generally trafficks street drugs.
     
    Nook likes this.
  5. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,168
    Likes Received:
    48,335
    Actually it’s gotten a lot better in the last 10 years.
     
    Nook likes this.
  6. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,168
    Likes Received:
    48,335
    All of this talk of increasing enforcement and changing asylum continues to ignore how out of touch our immigration laws are with reality.

    Our country can take in many more immigrants and there are employers looking for more labor. In every wave of immigrants there were people who said that we were being invaded and that our economy couldn’t handle so many immigrants. If those voices had been listened to then we wouldn’t have so many people descended from Irish immigrants who now say the same thing about Venezuelans.
     
    ROCKSS, pgabriel and Kim like this.
  7. Kim

    Kim Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 1999
    Messages:
    9,286
    Likes Received:
    4,178
    Or Mexicans who say the same thing. Or Colombians who say the same thing about Venezuelans. Latinos are not a monolith. A lot Latin American countries are hating on Venezuelans. If the Republicans play their ethnocentrism correctly and alter their racist rhetoric just a little, they can make huge strides in dividing Latino voters. They already have in the valley where many Mexican descendants see themselves as completely different from the current migrant waves.

    What do you mean by out of touch with reality? I'm putting forth a pro-economic argument, but most people are just hating on poor migrants from Latin America. I don't think most would be against increased legal immigration from western European countries. Or at least more would be for that vs. the current model of allowing one million people from southern failed nations through with the strong possibility that many will never show up to court and end up living without papers.
     
    Invisible Fan likes this.
  8. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,168
    Likes Received:
    48,335
    True Latino's arent' a monolith and many Irish who came to this country also quickly said the samething about Italians and Polish.
    The supply and demand curve is against our immigration laws. There are obviously many who want to come into this country but there are also many employers willing to hire them and in many spots of the country there is a shortage of labor. Like with most things when laws are out of touch with supply and demand a black market will proliferate to meet that. Much of our problems with immigration (coyotes, human smuggling and even drug smuggling) are because the black market proliferates. That is why many don't show up in court. This could be solved by bringing our immigration laws in line with the reality. Once most immigration is conducted through legal channels it will be easier to weed out those who want to do harm in this country from those who are willing to work and simply looking for a better life.

    Also while I'm sure most would welcome more immigration from Western Europe there isn't as big a supply of Western Europeans wanting to come to this country. Also are Western Europeans more hardworking than people from Latin America? Are they inherently smarter? I've been to both South America and Western Europe and know a lot from both regions. If anything people from Latin America are more willing to work hard while Western Europeans are rioting over the possiblity of the retirement age being raised by a few years.
     
    astros123 likes this.
  9. Kim

    Kim Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 1999
    Messages:
    9,286
    Likes Received:
    4,178
    I agree with your contention on the surface that the supply and demand curve is against our immigration laws. It's not that simple though. The system is purposefully convoluted so that front door, side door, and back door immigration appeases multiple parties. The extra-legal existence of undocumented workers is partially by design of 1990's policies, compromises from the desire for cheap labor. The magnitude of the recent years influxes have been harder to handle and have thrown that convoluted system out of wack.

    I disagree with your contention about why people don't show up for court. Most people don't show up for court are doing so for similar reasons why other people overstay their visas - they don't think they'd receive the legal right to stay in the US. Even if there were enough judges, about 70% of all asylum cases are denied. Do you think poor people from poor situations want to take that chance? Risk your life and trek here just so that you can stay for a little while and then legally be kicked out? Hell no. Humans want better lives and will do what's needed for themselves. I don't blame them. They'd rather live in the shadows of the US than stay in Venezuala. True policy experts know that the current system, with its roots from the 1990's, but with many tweaks since then, creates a structure that incentivizes/tolerates a certain level of illegal immigration. It's when those tolerated levels blow up occasionally that it becomes politically unstable.

    As for the last point, I agree with the generalization that Latin Americans are harder workers than Western Europeans. Third world residents are generally better workers than Americans and most first world people. That's a normal result of life circumstances. I wasn't making an argument against that. I was just stating that for racist reasons, a policy that promotes more legal immigration from white countries would be easier to swallow for the anti-immigrant wing of the Republican party. Thus, it's not really an out-of-touch issue as much as a race preference. And racial preference has roots in the design of this country way before the Chinese Exclusion Act, but just done by different means other than Congressional immigration law.
     
    Invisible Fan likes this.
  10. Kim

    Kim Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 1999
    Messages:
    9,286
    Likes Received:
    4,178


    Chicago is putting migrants in the hood and pissing off the hood. New York is putting migrants in the suburbs and pissing off the suburbs. Texas and Florida will just send more.

    Just send them to North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Nebraska, Missouri, Arkansas, Maryland, Maine, Utah, and so on. All those places and more have 2-to-3 job openings per available worker and are in dire need of labor in categories such as food service, hospitality, retail, and manufactoring. Migrants can do all of that.
     
  11. tinman

    tinman 999999999
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 1999
    Messages:
    104,381
    Likes Received:
    47,277
  12. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    60,014
    Likes Received:
    133,291
    Right, and how many of those are people smuggling drugs across the border and not seeking asylum?

    The reality is that out of 27,000 people there was very little criminal activity - and as I said, those with drugs were likely not seeking asylum, they were runners........ so no, they were not likely gang members seeking asylum and most runners are not gang members, they are the typically very poor people that are doing it purely for money.
     
  13. ROCKSS

    ROCKSS Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 1999
    Messages:
    7,498
    Likes Received:
    7,998

    I agree, the midwest cannot fill all the positions they have, I wish the federal government would work with these big companies like JBS Swift and Tyson who cant get people in the processing plants. Quite a few plants work with immigration and sponsor quite a few 3rd world countries to come and work. Get these folks to places that they can work and start paying taxes and have these companies sponsor them
     
    rocketsjudoka and astros123 like this.
  14. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    60,014
    Likes Received:
    133,291
    It is lost somewhat to history.......

    But 200 years ago Americans were not happy with the Scots came in and moved into the South Eastern USA.

    Then it was the Irish Catholics that flooded in - and THAT was a real problem, because the USA was a very Protestant country, and the divide between Catholics and Protestants persisted as a major problem from the 1860's through the 1960's.

    Then it was the Italians that poured in....... and they were considered anarchists and uneducated and poor and worst of all - NOT WHITE........ and Catholics to boot!

    Then sometime in the 1960's American white people decided that Italians were white and were not so bad.

    Then we had Mexicans and Puerto Ricans moving in........

    Then Cubans and Indians and South Americans and Vietnamese.

    We would have more Chinese except white people couldn't have that, and made sure they didn't come in numbers after they built the railroad - so they ended up going to Canada.


    I don't have a problem with the USA welcoming in new immigrants, in fact I think it keeps America sharp and competitive, and the cultural mix in the USA really is the best in the world.

    I do think that the USA should have some say on how many people and to some degree who comes over - but the reality is that in the past the USA has abused the right to decide who moves into the USA.

    I think back to the 1930's and Germany offered to send millions of Jews to the USA. They didn't always want to kill them - they just wanted them gone from Germany and Central Europe. The USA (in fairness the whole world) said no, and I wonder - how much stronger and better would the USA be if we had taken in all of the Jews and Catholics from Germany and Poland? How much stronger and better would the USA be had they not passed an act preventing Asians from becoming Americans.
     
  15. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    60,014
    Likes Received:
    133,291
    I disagree with you concerning there not being a lot of Western Europeans that want to come to the USA. There are a lot of people in places like Ireland, Northern Ireland, Poland and Italy. Spend much time there and it gets brought up. They don't come because it is hard to come and sneak in post 911.

    Also, there seems to be this belief by some conservatives/republicans that Europeans coming to America is a perfect fit, that there is no adjustment period and that they will fit their "ideal American". I can tell you, that is far from the case. There are a lot of first generation Polish people in Chicago, and they have a hard time just like any other immigration group and they have the same issues as non-Europeans.
     
  16. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    60,014
    Likes Received:
    133,291
    Chicago and New York needs to either put the immigrants back on a bus and ship them back to Texas or they need to offer a free bus ticket to anyone in Chicago or New York that wants to move to Texas.

    The decision by Texas and Florida to send them on a bus to other states isn't the proper decision - that isn't how this is supposed to work.

    Let's see how much Texas would like if California started give every homeless person and drug addict a $100 bill and put them on a bus to Texas.
     
    Andre0087 and Kim like this.
  17. StupidMoniker

    StupidMoniker I lost a bet

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2001
    Messages:
    16,172
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    That's why I said, "or gang associates". They are running the drugs for the gang, even if they are themselves not gang members. Also, there was a 100% rate of criminal activity, because it is illegal to cross the border other than at a designated port of entry 8 US Code 1325(a).
     
    Nook likes this.
  18. Kim

    Kim Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 1999
    Messages:
    9,286
    Likes Received:
    4,178
    Yes, it was the whole world that turned away Jews in need and Hitler was laughing at as all. Sure, from modern moral liberal democracy standpoint, the US has been abusive in regards to immigration policy, but I figure that to be a right of sovereign nations - the right to decide what makes up its population. We could try to democratically persuade the nation that immigration is good in general for the nation's benefit, and that idea did win out some in the 1960's and 1860's and maybe once or twice more. The vast majority of the time though, America has been very selective in deciding who to be let in and who to be let out, often times for racist reason.

    I'm reading A Nation by Design right now - nerdy history stuff, about 600 pages. If you have summer beach reading time or something like that, I suggest you give it a shot, if you're in to the nerdy history of immigration. It's not perfect, but the book reviews out there seem to agree that it's the best pre-1900 immigraiton deep dive out there, and okay at post 1900, but there's better books out there for post 1900.
     
    #118 Kim, May 10, 2023
    Last edited: May 10, 2023
    Invisible Fan and Nook like this.
  19. Kim

    Kim Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 1999
    Messages:
    9,286
    Likes Received:
    4,178
    I enjoy your posts, but I think you're wrong here. The problem is they don't want to be in Texas, the migrants. They came to Texas, they saw Texas, and they said, "please God, help us get out of here." Again, Abbott is a jerk, but it's pretty eye-opening how Chicago is going nuts over a few thousand, New York is going nuts over a few hundred, and we're all here criticizing the Texas government when the US government admitted to releasing 1 million migrants into Texas! What is El Paso, Brownsville, and Eagle Pass supposed to do with 1 million people released without homes/money/jobs over the last 2 years? It would be great if Texas were more welcoming, but 1) it's Texas' state right to be selfish asses with its resources (to a certain extent) and 2) Texas doesn't have a labor shortage issue that other states do. I didn't vote Abbott, but Texas border communities cannot handle 1 million extra migrants every 2 years. And if the feds didn't bus them, I understand the logic behing bussing. And again, better to Nebraska, but anywhere is better than the Texas border.

    In regards to California, since I think you have a legal background you may appreciate this. Let's do it. 9th circuit decisions are not binding on Texas. That's why Texas can have homeless ban and not be violation of the Constitution while California cannot. I don't see the 5th circuit ever overturning a homeless ban, so if Cali really were to bus homeless, the Texas Lege would simply pass en emergency session bill, or Abbott would sign an order and jail every homeless person sent from Cali, and then expand it. I mean, Abbott already jailed thousands of migrants on tresspassing charges, held them beyond allowable dates by the Texas Constitution without lawyers, and no one did anything about it. 70% of all Texas prisons don't have air conditioning. Few want to be in Texas unless they have AC.

    So, Texas is being an ass in many ways, but it's the right of Texas to do so.
     
    Nook likes this.
  20. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    60,014
    Likes Received:
    133,291
    So you admit that they are likely not gang members? They are associated with the gang to the extent someone offers them money and tells them to walk drugs across the border, but they are not drug addicts or gang members, and usually are not violent either. A lot of them are usually women.

    As far as calling them criminals because they crossed the border at the wrong spot - good luck with that really sullying their reputations or having them being painted as dangerous criminals. The USA is filled with the children and grandchildren and great grandchildren of people that illegally entered or remained in the USA.
     

Share This Page