Be honest. Your sexual desires are making you overlook 15 year old girls mutilating themselves to be sex objects for people like you. Jesus would cringe.
Adults do make those decisions. Adults make all of the important decisions for children. You give too much credit to those people. They have biases, motivations, agendas, and over-inflated egos clouding their judgment. Also, within those circles, there are people who disagree. Who's right? Who's wrong? Who knows? I won't presume to be right. Parents put themselves in front of their children all of the time. ALL OF THE TIME. It is not rare at all. I would be repeating myself if I respond to the rest of your post.
Your go-to moves, for someone who fancies himself as an intellectual superior, is typically guilt tripping and accusing. You have to ask yourself why that is. To the substance of this comment, I personally don't believe those surgeries should be allowed and the reason is the same as with the gender affirming surgeries although there is an obvious lesser evil of the two. People don't think the dude Bud-Light sponsors is normal. Using him to advertise their product is normalizing him. People are free to disagree with that. Where I disagree with the pushback is when it gets to the point of hate for the guy. You see, you disagree, you move on. Dude looks ridiculous, that's true, oh well. I don't agree or accept the concept of transgender. Nope. But it is out there and it will continue to gain more and more support because people succumb to the guilt trips and accusations. I don't see any love in the people who are unwilling to be honest with trans people and who are more than willing to destroy them with lies, therapy, medications, and surgeries. I have no idea what the SBC scandal is and I don't agree with child beauty pageants. Another example of parents who don't do what's best for their children and put themselves in front of their children. It's just one you happen to agree with.
So you are woke - because complaining about how a company makes money because you don't like who they sponsor is pretty woke.
It's amazing you are willing to admit this especially because it was the Houston Chronicle that broke the scandal. But it does show the media bubble you are sucked in that makes you irrationally hateful of transgender people.
You don't like some trains of wokeism. Is that what you are saying? You tolerate wokeism and don't get an aneurysm when it your tribe doing the Wokeism.
To you, hate is disagreement and unacceptance. I get that. Do you love or hate those who disagree with you? I don't know what woke or wokeism is. That's why I said I don't know if I'm woke. I'd drink Bud-Light if it was any good. I'd drink one with the dude that believes he's a girl. No idea if that answers your questions.
Yes but you won't spam 20 comments about being outraged about cancelling bud light. I hate those that deny the existence of people based on traits out of their control. Your ideological belief isn't out of your control. You can control getting out of your.medoq bubble. You not even knowing there is a SBC child sex abuse scandal while spending hours upon hours over transexual "groomers" shows the ideological news bubble you live in. The care of children isn't the agenda.
It is. Both would claim the child consented. There are good reasons why the child's alleged "consent" doesn't matter.
Spam is unsolicited. I am having a back and forth conversation with people. That's the problem. I am not denying anyone's existence. What I do deny is the correctness, the validity or reality of their thoughts. But when one believes that they are their thoughts, then it feels like their existence is being questioned or denied. You in the FBI or something? It'd he nice to have hours upon hours of free time to find a bubble to get into.
See this is where if you had basic introspection skills you would ask "why is the news sources I follow and the social feeds I follow never once mentioned the SBC scandal that has significantly more documented cases of child sex abuse than the entire teams community and yet at the same time claim their agenda is to "protect children" " That is what you should be asking yourself. You really can't escape this conundrum you are in. You openly admitted you never heard of a massive child sex abuse scandal in America yet know ever drag story time hour incident that has ever existed in human history. The most reasonable thing you should ask yourself if you weren't influenced by tribal politics is "why are the sources o adhere to not even touching this subject?".
So to be woke one has to actually avoid a product they like because they disagree with the brand's values, right? Still a lot of woke right-wingers then - guys shooting up budlight cans are woke, no?
My news source is ClutchFans, for the most part. If SBC was posted here, I must have missed it, but likely, a religious organization covering up sexual abuse is business as usual. Did you miss the post from I believe Nook that said that religious organizations are less likely to be involved in sexual abuse than the general population? Interesting if true.
No your news sources is outside of Clutchfans. Don't play stupid. If your entire perspective of transgenderism is based in Clutchfans posts, that would be even more pathetic. So I ask why are your social media algorithm streams and your primary news sources never once addressing an issue that has more explicit cases of children being sexually abused Why?
If I were to take a test on current events from the news sources you think I am into, I'd fail. Believe it or not.
