1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Would you be shocked?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Le$$, Apr 22, 2023.

?

Who mostly likely gets traded if this roster is upgraded threw trade?

Poll closed Jul 31, 2023.
  1. Jalen Green

    9 vote(s)
    6.7%
  2. Segun

    43 vote(s)
    31.9%
  3. Kevin porter Jr

    73 vote(s)
    54.1%
  4. Tari Eason

    12 vote(s)
    8.9%
  5. Jabari Smith

    7 vote(s)
    5.2%
  6. 2023 Pick

    29 vote(s)
    21.5%
  7. Nobody team is rebuilding? It's a slow Process

    9 vote(s)
    6.7%
  8. Kj Martin

    60 vote(s)
    44.4%
  9. Combo

    30 vote(s)
    22.2%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Corrosion

    Corrosion Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    10,021
    Likes Received:
    13,241

    Yeah, they are $16m under the tax line at $146m and will have two draft picks #21 & #22 which will cost them a little over $6m. That leaves them $10m from the tax ($162m) assuming they don't trade those picks.

    The apron is $170m.

    They have a trade exception for $18m.

    Do the math - they are in a bad place. Can't even sign their draft picks, use the full MLE and their trade exception as it puts them over the apron.

    It probably wouldn't take a terribly large contract to keep them from matching. $15m puts them in the 175% tax bracket with no other moves aside from signing their draft picks. $20m puts them in the 250% bracket as well as above the apron.
     
    Bobbythegreat likes this.
  2. Plowman

    Plowman Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 1999
    Messages:
    13,100
    Likes Received:
    14,839
    We don't differ too often, Day. But, I don't see him ever riding the bench. Scoot's an extremely talented 2 guard with handles playing "out of position" at the moment. Things will come into fockass as the team grows/ makes additions.
     
    daywalker02 likes this.
  3. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,551
    Likes Received:
    38,775
    The problem with trading KPJ is that you won't get HIS value back in return, he is more than likely here at least 1 more year to get beyond any issues with mental makeup to make you get value for him, at the moment he is a very good NBA guard, but you won't get that back in return.

    DD
     
  4. Hemingway

    Hemingway Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2016
    Messages:
    10,631
    Likes Received:
    13,848
    I hope so, that would be great. Don’t like him as our head honcho, but would absolutely love to see a Harden, KPJ, Green guard rotation. Who starts shouldn’t matter. I respect both you and Nook’s comments. On this one, they are pretty different. So if you are right, then the Rockets should keep KPJ, if Nook is right they should trade him as soon as possible before he wrecks his value.
     
    Plowman likes this.
  5. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    68,482
    Likes Received:
    31,949
    That's why I'd consider throwing a front loaded 4/100 at Cam, he'd come in and immediately be the 2nd best catch and shoot 3 point shooter on the team and improve the defense and I don't think that would be a bad contract towards the end even if he's never anything more than that.
     
  6. Hemingway

    Hemingway Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2016
    Messages:
    10,631
    Likes Received:
    13,848
    I’m not opposed to any of Cam, Brown, Bridges as our starting SF, but we do also need another really good vet PG/SG and a backup center. If we can do all that with our assets we would be very formidable pretty quickly. Either a guard rotation of Harden, Green, KPJ or some similar configuration along with Cam, Brown, or Bridges would almost assuredly put us in the playoffs.
     
  7. Hemingway

    Hemingway Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2016
    Messages:
    10,631
    Likes Received:
    13,848
    Like this scenario. It kind of really depends on the draft and whether we go all in on something like Brown or Bridges. We actually have enough space and assets to end up with Harden, Brown or Bridges, and Cam if everything were to fall our way.
     
  8. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    68,482
    Likes Received:
    31,949
    Realistically it would be only one of the 3 and it depends on the outcome of the draft.
     
  9. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,280
    double teamed more than Lebron

    lmao
     
  10. xiki

    xiki Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2002
    Messages:
    17,819
    Likes Received:
    3,168
    it isn’t always the matching, it could be the piece de last resistance.
     
  11. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    68,482
    Likes Received:
    31,949
    Literally a fact kiddo, even if it goes against your foolish narratives.
     
  12. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,551
    Likes Received:
    38,775
    Would you take Ben Simmons contract - if you got Mikael Bridges?

    DD
     
  13. Aruba77

    Aruba77 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 1999
    Messages:
    15,284
    Likes Received:
    18,516
    yes. We allow him to stay in Australia with his family while paying out the rest of his contract. Stone should be use to this
     
    AroundTheWorld likes this.
  14. Plowman

    Plowman Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 1999
    Messages:
    13,100
    Likes Received:
    14,839
    No way. I think Bridges is vastly overrated. And, we don't need BS taking up all that capspace.
     
  15. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    68,482
    Likes Received:
    31,949
    Why do that when you can just get Cam Johnson without trading anything or taking back any garbage?
     
    invocux likes this.
  16. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,280
    You came close, but no cigar.

    https://nbacourtoptix.nba.com/en/metrics/double-teams

    upload_2023-4-23_15-21-39.png

    This is merely a function of KPJ holding the ball so long all the damn time.

    upload_2023-4-23_15-23-20.png

    When you hog the ball for as long as KPJ does, and when you are turnover-prone as KPJ is, of course other teams will eventually try to take the ball out of your hands.

    Even the opponents get bored with KPJ dribbling the air out of the ball, with nowhere to go.
     
  17. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    68,482
    Likes Received:
    31,949
    So....you think 28.2% is more than 28.4%?

    LOL, you tried SOOO hard just to embarrass yourself.
     
  18. OremLK

    OremLK Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    20,073
    Likes Received:
    17,685
    You're assuming his production actually stays the same or improves next season. I don't think that's a safe assumption at all. He could drop off, get benched (or get benched right from the start), throw soup at somebody, and crater his value.

    There's a real possibility this past season was the best of his career and his value will never be higher than this offseason, and a strong argument for getting what you can for him now, especially if some GM is especially high on him and wants to gamble.
     
  19. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,280
    Well, kiddo, you made an absolute statement, not a relative one. 14.6 is more than 14.4.

    Try harder next time.
     
  20. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    68,482
    Likes Received:
    31,949
    Just for a reminder, this is the original statement

    LOL, you realize when I say that something happens more frequently I'm talking about a percentage of the time something happens, not the raw number of times a thing happens.....

    So if something happens a higher percentage of the time....it means it happens more frequently.....which is what I said.

    Honestly I didn't know I'd encounter people simple enough to where I'd have to spell that out.

    Just take your L hero, don't attempt to double down and embarrass yourself further. I understand that you thought you were being clever, but someone like you REALLY shouldn't try to be clever. You just aren't cut out for it.
     

Share This Page