2023 NFL Draft Thread

I love all of this, except if Young is there at #2 I want him. If not do what you just said.

also flirting with the idea of like a 3rd or 4th for Trey Lance and building with all other picks. If he’s bad, then we have a good pick for a QB next year, if he’s good then boom what a steal. (I just can’t choke down the idea of running mills out there again) *and this is also only if Young isn’t there at #2*

 

1. This is completely false, the test creators S2 have confirmed this. The lack of research on your part is damning, lacking basic manners and not being held accountable.

2. Is something that analyst Lombardi had heard and spread as an ear piece. Can you point to Ryan Day, his OSU coaches or teammates saying otherwise?

And I don’t even want to draft Stroud as a first preference.

 

Hey man, Kyle Berkshire is making great strides. Hope he can get on the tour soon. Lol.

 

Although I would like a qb “doesn’t matter which of the 4” I’ll be all over this.. specially if they can get Lance on the cheap.

 

Really cool video. You can't help but be a bug to a light when Richardson throws the ball.

He has an insane arm.

I would easily take him over Levis in this draft.

 

I think all 3 were debunked.

I think all of these have been debunked in some fashion.

Feels more like someone is trying to push his stock down.

 

I would selfishly run both of them into the ground. An RPO heavy offense with these types of guys would take you places into todays NFL.

I've been fixated on an idea from one of the other guys here lately. Imagine if you drafted AR, Bijan and Darnell Washington with your first 3 picks and then implemented an RPO offense with Bijan and Pearce in the backfield alongside AR. Washington is a great blocker and the POP passing concepts would be wide open out of those sets. How do you defend that?

 

I don't think they have been debunked. We know he didn't attend the Manning camp, for example. We need to be extra cautious about QB-selection. Obviously we were burned with Watson. Lot of smoke here.

 

Lance was way ahead of this. He also said this morning that a team had Stroud retake it because they were so concerned and he scored similarly.

 

This was me since about January.... lol

 

You should probably see my post above. Bob McGinn is as reliable as they come in the NFL. Stroud bombed S2.

 

I guess the S2 founders are lying? Referring to the top four quarterbacks.



In an interview with PFF he said many of the scores he sees leaked to the public are outright false, and that “all 4 QBs mentioned at the top of the draft scored very well”

 

It's actually brilliant when you can step back from the traditional ways of thinking. Im at the "make a deal with the devil" phase of my Texan fandom and Im thirsty enough to make a championship appearance that I'd be willing to sacrifice a short lived QB career to do it.

 

I think Tune, Hall and Haener will end up having long careers. Tune tested great in every aspect specially. Athletic, cognitive and statistically

 

Tune may be better than advertised especially if he has a running game like we would have.
With Schmitz and Mason and to a degree Schultz our Oline will be upgraded as well.
Having Schultz and Robinson as relief valves in the passing game our passers in the absence of a top flight receiver.
With those improvements on the O, I imagine that would be a favourable environment for any of our QB's and a rookie - including one at 1.2

 

As Lance mentioned this morning, a lot of teams are pissed these scores are getting leaked. Only 14 teams subscribe to S2. They saw this as their edge. Now it’s public knowledge. Teams can now look for other tech that they can use as their advantage over other teams. I doubt the creator of S2 would be happy about that.