1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Why not Lamar Jackson at Qb?

Discussion in 'Houston Texans' started by Hemingway, Dec 23, 2022.

  1. Hey Now!

    Hey Now! Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2000
    Messages:
    14,526
    Likes Received:
    5,526
    If Lamar is indeed on their radar, I'd rather the Texans pull that lever, post-draft. The Texans are going to win.... 7, 8 games with Lamar Jackson. Next year's #1 is highly unlikely to be as valuable as this year's. Adding 1.2, 1.12, 2.33 + Lamar Jackson would be a tremendous offseason.
     
    Rockets FTW likes this.
  2. zeeshan2

    zeeshan2 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2013
    Messages:
    55,547
    Likes Received:
    65,334
    https://theathletic.com/4427133/2023/04/19/lamar-jackson-ravens-contract-negotiation/
     
  3. JoeBarelyCares

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2001
    Messages:
    6,609
    Likes Received:
    1,883
    https://www.espn.com/nfl/draft2023/...icks-aaron-rodgers-lamar-jackson-aaron-donald

    2. Houston Texans

    Texans get: QB Lamar Jackson, 1-22
    Ravens get: 1-2, 3-73, 2024 fourth-round pick (conditional)

    This was the most difficult trade to put together. If the Texans want one of the top two quarterbacks, they can't move down. The team most interested in moving to this spot is the Colts (No. 4), Houston's division rivals, who also want a signal-caller. Dropping below the Colts and past the Seahawks (No. 5) would run the risk of not landing any of the top four quarterbacks, a move the Texans can't countenance after running out Davis Mills last season. The idea of moving down in a trade for Mac Jones is cute but probably not realistic.

    If we're going to put together a pie-in-the-sky proposal, let's make our first effort to resolve the Jackson situation in Baltimore. This probably would only make sense if two things are true. One would have to be that the Texans love only one quarterback in this class and the Panthers take that quarterback before them. The other is that the Ravens are so frustrated and so worried by the possibility of losing Jackson for free after 2024 that they're willing to settle for something significantly less than two first-round picks.

    How much less? Baltimore would have to attach a first-round pick with Jackson, although it would land this extremely valuable selection. In doing so, it would immediately be in position to land a franchise-altering replacement for Jackson from whomever doesn't go No. 1. The Ravens would land a couple of midround picks from Houston; the 2024 fourth-rounder would become a third-rounder if Jackson plays 80% of the offensive snaps in 2023 or a second-rounder if he plays 90% of the snaps.

    In this scenario, Jackson would sign his franchise tag before inking a long-term deal for one more guaranteed dollar than Deshaun Watson got as part of his trade to Cleveland. New Houston offensive coordinator Bobby Slowik was most recently the passing game coordinator in San Francisco, where Kyle Shanahan had installed a quarterback run-friendly attack for Trey Lance before the second-year passer suffered an ankle injury last season. Jackson would be a big bet for the Texans, but as they try to rebuild trust with their fan base and compete in the AFC South, his floor and ceiling both project to be better than this draft's quarterbacks. Houston would also still have two first-rounders -- Nos. 12 and 22 -- and could use one of them on a much-needed wide receiver to help Jackson.

    By both the Johnson and Stuart charts, this would value Jackson as being worth a top-10 pick. It's not two first-rounders for the Ravens, but this might be better than two future first-round picks from a team that likely projects to pick in the 20s in 2024 and 2025. This deal is more implausible than most of the others in this article (which is saying a lot), but there's a universe in which it makes sense for both parties.
     
    BamBam, zeeshan2, Rockets FTW and 2 others like this.
  4. Rockets FTW

    Rockets FTW Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    4,675
    Likes Received:
    2,121
    It's happening gif
     
  5. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    48,950
    Likes Received:
    19,866
    [​IMG]
     
    Caesar and red5rocket like this.
  6. Rockets FTW

    Rockets FTW Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    4,675
    Likes Received:
    2,121
    With these articles coming out, it's making a ton of sense. If we don't go QB (could all be a smokescreen and we take Stroud anyways), I really believe they should trade those 2024 firsts or a first for Lamar Jackson. He won in BAL despite roster deficiencies on offense and now would have more weapons post-draft.

    Pipe dream for this SF south team:
    #2 - Will Anderson
    #12 - JSN
    ----
    Trade up to top 15-20 to snag Bijan Robinson. Creates one of the most prolific 1-2 RB punches in the game with our improved O-Line.

    Make trade for Lamar. I don't know how we wouldn't be the AFC South favorites.
     
    Hey Now! likes this.
  7. RHU525

    RHU525 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2002
    Messages:
    5,754
    Likes Received:
    8,067
    If we get Lamar we are winning way more than 8 games. We are winning the division. At least 10-11 games.
     
    Verbal Christ likes this.
  8. Verbal Christ

    Verbal Christ Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Messages:
    19,925
    Likes Received:
    31,269
    Lamar Jackson in a Shanahan offense? Sheeeesh! Those naked bootlegs are going to be rad!
     
  9. Mr.Scarface

    Mr.Scarface Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    13,048
    Likes Received:
    8,352
    Lamar has won ONE playoff game. He has missed 5 and 6 games in the last 2 seasons. NO thx.
     
  10. Rockets FTW

    Rockets FTW Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    4,675
    Likes Received:
    2,121
    The Ravens without Lamar Jackson would have had a top 10 pick every year. He carried those teams on his back and would be the most accomplished QB to ever wear a Texans uniform if he landed in the H.

    Also, Idk if you know this but it's rare nowadays to have a QB start all 17 games. Hell, Hurts missed weeks 15-17 due to injury and toughed out week 18.
     
  11. RHU525

    RHU525 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2002
    Messages:
    5,754
    Likes Received:
    8,067
    I've said this before. If the Ravens had locked him into a long term deal last year. He woulda gutted it out and played at the end of the season. But since he wasn't signed he was not risking injury in a contract year.
     
    red5rocket likes this.
  12. Mr.Scarface

    Mr.Scarface Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    13,048
    Likes Received:
    8,352
    Then he is all about the money. Don't want a QB making that the only thing he thinks about. If he won or was a better passer, the money will come. He is not a player that should be his own agent. He doesn't have that skill.
     
  13. RHU525

    RHU525 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2002
    Messages:
    5,754
    Likes Received:
    8,067
    You are absolutely crazy to think that makes him all about money. Would you jeapordize your future? If he gets a serious injury he gets nothing. It made no sense to play. And that's on Baltimore.
     
    Caesar and Fulgore like this.
  14. Mr.Scarface

    Mr.Scarface Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    13,048
    Likes Received:
    8,352
    Now he sees his value in the league. He could have just accepted the contract the Ravens offered, which was better than the one Hurts got. Naw, his ego won't accept that Watson got that contract from the Browns. He thinks because he won the MVP 4 years ago....he deserves more. LOL. Good luck with that.

    No way the Texans trade for Lamar.
     
    red5rocket and Wattafan like this.
  15. red5rocket

    red5rocket Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    11,378
    Likes Received:
    14,780


    Not in favor but like to see posters complain
     
  16. J.R.

    J.R. Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    113,997
    Likes Received:
    175,619
     
    #96 J.R., Apr 27, 2023
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2023
    Fulgore likes this.
  17. Fulgore

    Fulgore Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Messages:
    18,272
    Likes Received:
    18,398
    Broke the bank. Props to LJ
     
  18. Qan

    Qan Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2012
    Messages:
    5,040
    Likes Received:
    7,228
    Glad this is over with.
     
  19. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    48,950
    Likes Received:
    19,866
    Let's see the figures.
     
    cmoak1982 likes this.
  20. cmoak1982

    cmoak1982 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    18,080
    Likes Received:
    22,623
    I saw a rumor about 5/245 all guaranteed. Not sure how true
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now