1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Why not Lamar Jackson at Qb?

Discussion in 'Houston Texans' started by Hemingway, Dec 23, 2022.

  1. Verbal Christ

    Verbal Christ Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Messages:
    19,925
    Likes Received:
    31,269
    Sure thats a fair observation, but when guys say he's not a capable pocket passer and is only effective as a runner I think bias has taken hold of the conversation. I think the biggest obstacle is his contract demands more than anything. If he wasnt demanding that type of F you money he would have plenty of teams trying to sign him.

    Again for Big Ben to spout off pocket passing as a casual observer and then when you dive into it you find LJ is a better pocket passer than Big Ben it was just laughingly ironic.
     
    red5rocket and cmoak1982 like this.
  2. Hey Now!

    Hey Now! Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2000
    Messages:
    14,526
    Likes Received:
    5,526
    Both of his significant injuries occurred while he was in the pocket, owing more to bad luck than any sort of propensity for injury because of his style of play.
     
    Verbal Christ likes this.
  3. Wattafan

    Wattafan Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2014
    Messages:
    1,942
    Likes Received:
    528
    I think there is merit in saying LJ makes his line better as well. He'll need to here.
     
  4. Hemingway

    Hemingway Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2016
    Messages:
    10,687
    Likes Received:
    13,931
    Lamar is a no go, because of the cost of 2 first rounders and the mega deal he is looking for.
     
    Wattafan likes this.
  5. conquistador#11

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    39,121
    Likes Received:
    28,193
    Has Philly reached an agreement with Hurts?
    Give him a 2022 Astros championship ring and a gold Selena Astros tribute hat and get him over here!
     
    houstonstime and Fulgore like this.
  6. Verbal Christ

    Verbal Christ Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Messages:
    19,925
    Likes Received:
    31,269
    conquistador#11 and Fulgore like this.
  7. conquistador#11

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    39,121
    Likes Received:
    28,193
    #67 conquistador#11, Apr 17, 2023
    Last edited: Apr 17, 2023
  8. cmoak1982

    cmoak1982 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    18,080
    Likes Received:
    22,623
  9. Fulgore

    Fulgore Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Messages:
    18,269
    Likes Received:
    18,393
    Nicole Lynn daaaaaamn
     
  10. cmoak1982

    cmoak1982 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    18,080
    Likes Received:
    22,623
    He’s got a couple baddies on his team lol
     
    red5rocket, Fulgore and houstonstime like this.
  11. Verbal Christ

    Verbal Christ Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Messages:
    19,925
    Likes Received:
    31,269
    Im pretty sure LJ will "settle" for a similar bag.
     
    Sooty and cmoak1982 like this.
  12. red5rocket

    red5rocket Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    11,375
    Likes Received:
    14,778
    The fact he didn’t reach a Super Bowl, you should. I rather a Super Bowl visit from my QB than a MVP.


    See how Aaron Rodgers turned out.
     
    cmoak1982 likes this.
  13. IslandB.O.I.

    IslandB.O.I. Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2013
    Messages:
    855
    Likes Received:
    1,224
    I’m fairly certain the cost is 2 first rounders. It has to be 1 each year for 2 years. The Ravens don’t set this price, it’s the rules of how his non-exclusive franchise tag works. A team signs him to an offer sheet. If the Ravens don’t match the offer sheet, then they lose Lamar to the team that signed him but get the 2 firsts in return. And from my understanding it has to be that teams actual picks and not picks acquired in a trade. For the Texans that would be the #2 pick and not the 12. This why they wouldn’t even consider this.
     
    cmoak1982 likes this.
  14. Air Langhi

    Air Langhi Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2000
    Messages:
    21,937
    Likes Received:
    6,686
    The only part of the contract means anything is the guaranteed part. I mean lets say you get a 5 year 250 million deal and only 200 is guaranteed. So lets say the last year is not guaranteed. If you out play your contract you still only get 50 mil in your last year. If you suck you get cut. What is the point of agreeing to the non guaranteed part of the contract. There is basically no upside for you. Patrick Mahomes should have demanded a fully guaranteed 500 million dollar contract. Would have loved to see the chiefs not pay him.
     
  15. Verbal Christ

    Verbal Christ Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Messages:
    19,925
    Likes Received:
    31,269
    Boils down to player shelf lives. Football is a violent sport with shortest average career with a shtload of injuries. Any given play could seriously hinder future performance. The non guaranteed portion gives owners the warm fuzzies in case it happens.
     
  16. Hey Now!

    Hey Now! Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2000
    Messages:
    14,526
    Likes Received:
    5,526
    This is not 100% true. If a player signs their tag, which Lamar is free to do, the teams can negotiate a trade that does not necessarily include two first round picks.

    For instance, the Ravens may very well see the #2 overall pick as adequate compensation and agree to the deal.
     
    Rockets FTW and Wattafan like this.
  17. Wattafan

    Wattafan Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2014
    Messages:
    1,942
    Likes Received:
    528
    That would change things for me - LJ is a known quantity while the draftees are not.
    I would do Mac Jones for #65 + #104.
     
  18. Rockets FTW

    Rockets FTW Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    4,675
    Likes Received:
    2,121
    I wonder how the city of Houston would react to an explosive move like that.

    I'd imagine it would be positive and it's not our money so why not? If our #2 is the only thing sacrificed and our draft capital stayed in tact... count me in.
     
  19. RHU525

    RHU525 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2002
    Messages:
    5,750
    Likes Received:
    8,056
    Rather just trade after the draft. Pick Will Anderson or trade down to get more picks. Then use those picks to trade for Lamar. So basically he cost us nothing but money which we have a ton of.

    I'll never understand GMs. The panthers gave up soo much to move up to 1 in a weak qb class. They coulda traded less and got a proven MVP.
     
    Rockets FTW likes this.
  20. J.R.

    J.R. Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    113,976
    Likes Received:
    175,529
    https://theathletic.com/4427133/2023/04/19/lamar-jackson-ravens-contract-negotiation/

    Four ways the Ravens’ Lamar Jackson saga can unfold, from trade to ‘nuclear’ option

    It’s a great week for the Philadelphia Eagles and quarterback Jalen Hurts … and another dreary one for the Baltimore Ravens and their estranged quarterback, Lamar Jackson.

    Hurts’ five-year, $255 million contract extension with the Eagles refocused attention on the stalemate between the Ravens and Jackson, with the 2023 NFL draft barely a week away. Though the deal between Hurts and the Eagles had been expected for months, there are no indications a resolution is near for Jackson and the Ravens.

    Multiple scenarios remain in play, with the draft serving as the next pivot point. With that in mind, I’ve worked through four possible outcomes for the Ravens and Jackson, from a pre-draft trade to a nuclear option. The risks, rewards and tradeoffs associated with each scenario promote a fuller understanding of the dynamics at play.

    Scenario 1: Pre-draft trade

    The Houston Texans are the most interesting team heading toward the draft.

    Beyond rumors that general manager Nick Caserio could depart after the draft, reports have surfaced suggesting the Texans might not select a quarterback with the second pick if Carolina chooses Alabama’s Bryce Young first.

    This makes little sense on the surface. Young and Ohio State’s C.J. Stroud are quarterbacks widely considered worthy of top-five selections. Houston needs a quarterback.

    The fact that Stroud employs the same agent who helped orchestrate Deshaun Watson’s acrimonious departure from the organization 13 months ago could be relevant. The Texans could plausibly fear entering into a long-term quarterback marriage with Watson’s agent so quickly as they look to make a clean break from a painful chapter.

    Jackson could solve the problem for Houston by arming the Texans with an upper-tier quarterback carrying star power to pair with their new defensive-minded head coach, DeMeco Ryans.

    The Texans hold the second and 12th picks in the draft. Trading one of those selections to Baltimore as part of a package for Jackson could position the Ravens to land an exciting replacement for Jackson in this draft. Jackson has already asked for a trade. Jackson would have to work with the Ravens and any other team to facilitate a deal, which could be tricky, but if team and player conclude the relationship is beyond repair, why prolong their suffering and inevitable divorce?

    By retaining at least one pick in the top 12 this year, Houston might still be able to land an elite defensive player, which would be ideal for Ryans, without gambling on a college quarterback.

    The Ravens would extricate themselves from a difficult situation, signing up for three or four seasons of a quarterback on an affordable cookie-cutter deal requiring almost no negotiation. Their new quarterback would pair with their new offensive coordinator, arriving on time to maximize their chances for success in a new era of Ravens football.

    Scenario 2: Post-draft offer sheet

    Jackson’s inability to find suitors as a non-exclusive franchise player makes it appear as though the quarterback has overplayed his hand. But the silence Jackson has encountered says as much about the market as it says about Jackson.

    Fighting for a Watson-type deal would be easier if Jackson were in a Watson-type situation. He is not.

    Last offseason, Watson leveraged a fully guaranteed five-year deal from Cleveland partly because Houston was publicly committed to trading him, which allowed Watson to operate almost like an unrestricted free agent.

    Everyone knew Houston had to trade Watson. No one knew the Browns would be desperate enough to pursue Watson until Watson had no choice but to listen. Watson completed a Hail Mary that might never be available to another player.

    Jackson is operating in a more restrictive environment. The Ravens have not renounced their interest in retaining him. As a result, teams that might sign Jackson to an offer sheet fear Baltimore would exercise its right of first refusal. No one wants to do the Ravens’ negotiating for them. Watson faced no such restrictions last offseason. He had real power.

    Dynamics could change after the draft.

    At present, teams signing Jackson to an offer sheet would have to send 2023 and 2024 first-round picks to Baltimore if the Ravens declined to match, per rules governing franchise players. The compensation changes to 2024 and 2025 first-rounders once the 2023 draft passes. Teams could be more willing to risk future assets than current ones, although Baltimore might be proportionally incentivized to match.

    A post-draft move could make additional sense if the Ravens draft a quarterback with the 22nd pick or somewhere in the first couple rounds. They would then have a viable alternative to Jackson. They do not employ one now. Meanwhile, other teams hoping to land quarterbacks in the draft might not land one, which could motivate them to consider Jackson.

    Houston and Indianapolis are two obvious candidates to consider Jackson after the draft if they do not use early choices for quarterbacks. Neither employs a higher-profile veteran starter, so pursuing Jackson would not risk damaging existing relationships.

    Scenario 3: Cooler heads prevail

    […]

    Scenario 4: Nuclear option

    […]
     
    Rockets FTW likes this.

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now