1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

The GOP/Conservatives are Scared and Maybe up for a war in Mexico.

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by glynch, Apr 13, 2023.

  1. Buck Turgidson

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    101,333
    Likes Received:
    103,933
    No doubt about that, but that's a whole 'nuther story.

    But it's not just Mexico...Argentina is one of the most poorly run countries I've ever seen, and they're not drug-dependent.
     
  2. thegary

    thegary Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Messages:
    11,018
    Likes Received:
    3,145
    Look, this thread is about Mexico. You dragged the whole of Latin America into it. Case by case basis, but Mexico has everything in the world to be a major economic power. No cartels and then they can chip away at other issues. Starve out the cartels and they would be well on their way to a bright future.
     
  3. Buck Turgidson

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    101,333
    Likes Received:
    103,933
    Yes I did, because I've been all around there and it's all so ****ing sad.
     
  4. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,096
    Likes Received:
    3,608
    Sorry, but a lot is not really factually true. Hey I'm sure your mainstream sources ,no matter how many, are saying the same things like they usually do are wrong or at best misleading. Most of the fentanyl comes in through West Coast ports and Canada. Only about 30% through Mexico. Also cartels do,not actually control large parts of Mexico. I guess you could say falsely and somewhat similarly that organized which distributes fentanyl throughout the US makes them in control of most of the United States. To be in control means that they occupy territory are not hiding and fleeing law authorities, from my point of view.
     
  5. ThatBoyNick

    ThatBoyNick Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    31,422
    Likes Received:
    49,289
     
  6. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,096
    Likes Received:
    3,608
    INE or the national election board has itself blatantly stood by as previous presidents stole past presidential elections in the past from AMLO, but he eventually became so popular and won by 30% so you could argue that his vote was too big to steal.

    See wikipedia on AMLO as for AMLO's bio a as there is a virtual firewall on reporting good news about him as he threatens our elite, both Repubs and Dems. ( I vote Dem just to be clear, but there is a reason we are the most unequal of the advanced countries and such abominations as hundreds of thousands a year dying and millions suffering unnecessarily for lack of healthcare. A reason why so many Americans abstain from voting, vote against their interests by backing crazy Trump or remain largely content and oblivious if they are in the roughly top 25% etc.

    For some info on Mexico outside the mainstream see https://globaljusticecenter.org/videos/amlos-fourth-transformation-mexico
    A talk by the head of the Editor-in-Chief of the Mexican Law Review, and a noted international scholar.

    or see https://jacobin.com/2023/01/amlo-mexico-redistribution-success-government-transformation
    or be content with the same old sources that all take the same position.
     
    #26 glynch, Apr 14, 2023
    Last edited: Apr 14, 2023
  7. MexAmercnMoose

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,080
    Likes Received:
    488
    not like the Gringos had anything to do with how Mexico and the rest of the Americas ended up right? no American involvement right? lulz...*shrugs, maybe AMLO was right, the gringos need more hugs
     
  8. Buck Turgidson

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    101,333
    Likes Received:
    103,933
    jacobin.com is an interesting source, but it's glynch so there's that


    It was a group effort, and continues to be.
     
  9. Buck Turgidson

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    101,333
    Likes Received:
    103,933
    #29 Buck Turgidson, Apr 15, 2023
    Last edited: Apr 15, 2023
  10. tinman

    tinman 999999999
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 1999
    Messages:
    104,466
    Likes Received:
    47,384

    Americans need their cheap tummy tucks
    Without the fear of getting shot by the cartel
    @Salvy
     
    Salvy likes this.
  11. Exiled

    Exiled Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2013
    Messages:
    5,153
    Likes Received:
    1,282
  12. Buck Turgidson

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    101,333
    Likes Received:
    103,933
  13. Amiga

    Amiga Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    25,154
    Likes Received:
    23,442
    so many TOP Republicans

    I would normally not take this at all seriously. But we have a very abnormal GOP party.

    Why Trump and other Republicans want to go to war in Mexico - Vox
    An astonishingly bad idea that’s gotten popular very quickly.
    Apr 21, 2023

    One of the hottest new ideas in Republican politics is, apparently, launching a war in Mexico.

    Three recent articles — in Rolling Stone, Politico, and Semafor — traced the rise of the proposal from obscurity to the party’s highest levels, finding ample evidence of the idea’s popularity in the GOP ranks. Former President Donald Trump, for example, has been asking for a “battle plan” to “attack Mexico,” specifically targeting drug cartel strongholds in the country. Every single declared Republican presidential candidate has endorsed treating cartels like terrorist organizations. And in both the House and the Senate, leading Republicans have proposed authorizing the use of military force in Mexico to fight cartels.


    The real reasons Republicans are proposing war with Mexico
    It’s tempting, given the thinness of these proposals, to simply dismiss them as political nothings: empty gestures of being “strong on crime” and “strong on border security.”

    Many of these proposals conflate drug trafficking, undocumented migration, and violence as various different problems caused by cartels that could be solved with sufficient amounts of American ordinance. That makes little sense as a policy matter — each has different contours, even if the cartels have a hand in all of them — but makes perfect sense as a political matter, as it conjures a picture of a lawless border that the Biden administration is failing to secure out of sheer fecklessness.

    But dismissing this rhetoric as purely political would be a mistake.

    For one thing, ideas like this have a tendency to go from absurdities to policy. When Trump first called for a “total and complete shutdown” on Muslim immigration to the United States in 2015, it was widely rejected by Republicans and Democrats alike. During his presidency, Trump repeatedly tried to do it — at first causing chaos at American airports and, ultimately, successfully implementing a version of it.

    Given that the former president is once again the prohibitive favorite in the 2024 race, and that he is reportedly asking for “battle plans” for a war on the cartels, the proposal needs to be taken at least somewhat seriously.

    Moreover, the fact that these ideas have gained so much traction in the past month — accelerating after another brutal murder of Americans by cartels — illustrates some profoundly important things about the state of the Republican party.

    Dara Lind, a senior fellow at the pro-migration American Immigration Council (and my former Vox colleague), sees the vogue for using force as an outgrowth of broader Republican ideology: “the ongoing conflation of migration with invasion” and “the idea that fentanyl importation is a deliberate plot to weaken America.” On these theories, cartels and the Mexican government (through its inaction) are facilitating nothing less than the broad-based destruction of American communities.

    This kind of apocalyptic picture of the United States, a country whose middle class is being destroyed by drugs and undocumented migrants driving down wages, is an archetypical Trump-era Republican theme. Again and again, the populist right mentions drugs and immigration — along with the decline of manufacturing and the rise of “wokeness” — as some of the root causes of terminal American decline.

    But as well tailored as “invade Mexico” is to the Trump era, it’s not a wholly new impulse. Waging literal war on drugs outside of America’s borders is a very old idea, one with significant bipartisan support. For Republicans in particular, casting themselves as tough on drugs and crime — in contrast to weak Democrats — predates Trump’s rise by decades.

    So too does a willingness to launch a unilateral ground invasion in the name of fighting non-state actors that allegedly threaten American national security.

    Trump, in theory, was supposed to be a break with that kind of hawkishness: he ran in part on his (false) claim to have opposed the war in Iraq. Yet time and again in his presidency, we saw that the strangely widespread idea of “Donald the Dove” was essentially false: Trump was no less willing to use force than other post-Cold War presidents, just willing to do it for somewhat different reasons.

    A new Mexican-American war would be every bit as reckless as the Iraq war, quite possibly more so, since Mexico is literally America’s neighbor. That it’s become popular again shows both how the focus of the Republican party has changed in the past 20 years — and the ways in which its essential hawkishness has not.
     
    mdrowe00 likes this.

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now