1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Top QB in 2023 draft

Discussion in 'Houston Texans' started by Wattafan, Dec 2, 2022.

?

Texans best option if QB #1 overall

Poll closed Jan 31, 2023.
  1. Bryce Young Al

    50 vote(s)
    68.5%
  2. C.J. Stroud OS

    7 vote(s)
    9.6%
  3. Will Levis UK

    1 vote(s)
    1.4%
  4. Max Duggan TCU

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. Grayson McCall CC

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. Hendon Hooker Ten.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  7. Anthony Richardson Fl

    2 vote(s)
    2.7%
  8. No QB with #1

    13 vote(s)
    17.8%
  1. cmoak1982

    cmoak1982 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    18,077
    Likes Received:
    22,614
    Stop lying dude. This is just false. You’re coming across real racist man
     
  2. showa13

    showa13 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2011
    Messages:
    2,216
    Likes Received:
    1,976
    Drake Maye would absolutely be QB1 in this draft. Size, arm, athleticism. He’d be QB1 in quite a few drafts. He’s not Caleb Williams, but Caleb Williams has generational tools.
     
    Verbal Christ, Sooty and cmoak1982 like this.
  3. Jayded

    Jayded Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2022
    Messages:
    380
    Likes Received:
    554
    It's definitely more top heavy for sure, but Maye or Williams would be the clear QB1 in this class in my opinion too.

    Williams' game has changed a tad since he started college football. Most high school scouts compared him to Dak Prescott at the time, but he's clearly not grown into Dak's size and he's more mobile. Lately people are comparing him to Mahomes, but that's dangerous to compare anyone to a guy who's a multiple time MVP, but their games are more similar for sure, though Williams is shorter and lighter than Mahomes. There isn't a direct comparison, but he's probably considered "lesser/shorter Mahomes" with the potential to pull off similar tricks, though he'll never be his size (6'1 200 vs. 6'3 230).

    Drake Maye also finds himself in the odd pro comparison because folks are very bullish on his prospects too. The most common comparison is Justin Herbert, though I'd be first to admit Herbert has surprised me as a pro personally. I thought he might be middle-pack but he's definitely top ten currently, so if Maye projects near that ceiling, he's possibly even QB1 if teams are concerned with Williams' size/injury history. Maye's more Mahomes' size (6'4 220) than he is Herbert sized (6'6 240) too.

    But, given the above, and my personal comparison of the top two QBs in this class being Tua/Goff-like in projection, you see why I personally greatly favor waiting to 2024 to pick one of these two. I'd much rather we pre-stock the cupboards on offensive talent and defensive talent this year, ride out the wave of Mills/backups and position ourselves for Williams/Maye.
     
    Shark44, Verbal Christ and cmoak1982 like this.
  4. Sooty

    Sooty Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    2,288
    Likes Received:
    2,265
    Contention for QB1 for sure. Absolute out and out, you could argue either way with the body of work but he does have potential.
     
    cmoak1982 likes this.
  5. Omihall23

    Omihall23 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2016
    Messages:
    954
    Likes Received:
    1,606
    People wasting time swooning over 2024 QBs when we’re definitely picking a QB in this year’s draft.
     
    javal_lon, whag00 and red5rocket like this.
  6. cmoak1982

    cmoak1982 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    18,077
    Likes Received:
    22,614
    I don’t think it’s definitive. Ryans may want a stud defender
     
    Wattafan and Sooty like this.
  7. Omihall23

    Omihall23 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2016
    Messages:
    954
    Likes Received:
    1,606
    That may be true, but he also saw what we all saw throughout the playoffs. Offense is king. No matter how good your defense is, it’s not stopping a really great offense. If you want to win in this league you have to take your offense seriously and that starts at QB.
     
    Sooty, cmoak1982 and red5rocket like this.
  8. Commodore

    Commodore Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2007
    Messages:
    33,543
    Likes Received:
    17,505
  9. Jayded

    Jayded Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2022
    Messages:
    380
    Likes Received:
    554
    The problem is we need to pay attention to what worked for the teams who are really working at top gear now.

    They knew they needed to either have a generational talent at QB to magnet talent to them (ala Allen or Lawrence) or build the team bottom up and then fill in the QB and a few final pieces (ala Hurts/Eagles).

    I don’t see a gravitational talent at QB in this class and we are more in the latter situation on the front end. Even if folks like Young/Stroud, do we really want to start the QB clock now with our surrounding parts?
     
  10. RocketFan007

    RocketFan007 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2001
    Messages:
    5,170
    Likes Received:
    266
  11. Omihall23

    Omihall23 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2016
    Messages:
    954
    Likes Received:
    1,606
    It was an interesting read. Obviously his statistical model also projected some notable busts, but at the high range statistically where Bryce Young and CJ Stroud are at compared to past quarterbacks it looks very encouraging. I'd be happy with either of them. I wasn't surprised to see Will Levis look disastrously bad here either because the numbers and the eye test have always looked bad, but for some reason people just like big, strong guys.
     
  12. cmoak1982

    cmoak1982 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    18,077
    Likes Received:
    22,614
    Of course a statistic based model is going to favor QBs that put up numbers with elite talent around them. No one is saying Stroud didn’t have great statistical output. He is a product of the talent around him, not the other way around. He has no physical attributes outside of maybe accuracy (easy to throw to wide open receivers) that are even considered great.
     
    Sooty likes this.
  13. cmoak1982

    cmoak1982 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    18,077
    Likes Received:
    22,614
    Levis numbers weren’t elite, but you’re a fool if you think he didn’t pass the eye test. He had some wow moments, more than Richardson who some are claiming to be a big time prospect.
     
    Wattafan and Sooty like this.
  14. javal_lon

    javal_lon Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    11,701
    Likes Received:
    9,586
    People wasting time swooning over 2024 QBs when some unknown young QB gonna get projected higher in about 6 months. But his ass won't be eligible till 2026
     
    jelanit and houstonstime like this.
  15. Omihall23

    Omihall23 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2016
    Messages:
    954
    Likes Received:
    1,606
    Richardson's wow moments are much better than Levis'. So if they're both big gambles, might as well swing for the fences.

    Stroud certainly had elite receivers his entire time at Ohio State, but anyone who states that he didn't throw into tight windows at all is just being disingenuous or hasn't watched tape.
     
  16. cmoak1982

    cmoak1982 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    18,077
    Likes Received:
    22,614
    No they’re not. Levis has some highlights that very few people are capable of. Not taking away from Richardsons athleticism but Levis isn’t far off and by far a better athlete than Stroud or Young.

    You can watch any highlight tape of Stroud and the majority of his throws are wide open. He has a few nice ones, but some that would be for sure picks in the NFL.



    There are multiple runs and throws on this video that only a few players can make. There’s also some plays that would be turnovers in the league
     
    #76 cmoak1982, Feb 14, 2023
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2023
  17. Mr.Scarface

    Mr.Scarface Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    13,046
    Likes Received:
    8,347
    Seriously dude? I've posted the numbers. You choose to ignore them. Im a racist for not liking Levis and Maye.....lol. Ok......

    Maye's numbers: https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/drake-maye-1/gamelog/2022/

    Stoud's:
    https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/cj-stroud-1/gamelog/2021/
    https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/cj-stroud-1/gamelog/2022/

    Young's:
    https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/bryce-young-1/gamelog/2021/
    https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/bryce-young-1/gamelog/2022/

    Note: Young and Stroud had limited playing in 2020.

    Look at Maye's last 4 games of 2022, especially the Georgia Tech.
    Cmoak will reference Stroud's Northwestern game. That game was terrible throwing conditions and both teams struggled on offense (look at the full game log).

    Decided for yourself, people.
     
  18. cmoak1982

    cmoak1982 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    18,077
    Likes Received:
    22,614
    Once again. Maye had better numbers than Young and Stroud this year, specially when factoring in rushing and talent.
    Literally not one scout has Stroud or Young over Maye.
    But, we know why you don’t want him.
     
  19. houstonstime

    houstonstime Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2014
    Messages:
    4,638
    Likes Received:
    4,902
  20. houstonstime

    houstonstime Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2014
    Messages:
    4,638
    Likes Received:
    4,902
    One thing I don’t understand about this argument. What is more important? Talent around you or talent you are playing against? Playing with worse talent against weaker teams is a wash against the opposite, so just look at numbers. Also, I’m advocating for young, as you know, not Stroud.
     
    cmoak1982 likes this.

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now