Its time to discuss trading Jalen Green while he's still worth a damn

Yes they did, Sengoat says it loads. Making up bullshit when the evidence is all over the forum makes you look disingenuous.

 

I agree, but again:

If he DOESN'T earn his time, we end-up with a SAC/Bagley situation where there is no more trade value.

So that's something a Front Office must consider. There are risks/benefits in each pathway.

 

it's just one idiot making multiple accounts

 

you certainly can and considering that players under 20 were effectively banned from the NBA for about 60 out of its 75 years of its existence it would be distinctly anticlimactic.

No matter what stat you put up - everything, good and bad, is a function of Green being an abnormally high usage player relative to his efficiency to an extent that most players his age just aren't.

This is mostly because the Rockets just don't GAF about being good at basketball for the last few years(though in a few years he may be joined by others) and have obviously given him free reign, for better or worse.

This basically underpins any list you throw based on accumulations of counting stats - it's just not that persuasive and like you said, will be less so as others accumulate similar counting stats.

 

he is not a scorer but a bad teammate and a selfish chucker

ALPEREN SENGUN IS A SCORER

 

no the last game is just a hair that broke camels back... this is a regular game for jalen... his 30 bombs are an exception..; even when he scores 20 its always on some shitty efficiency and he ruins teams play and wastes his teammates effort...

hes really not a good teammate..sorry you need more than cute looks and nail polish to be a good bb player and a good teammate

 

Also a kooky reminder that Franz Wagner - who is all of 6 months older than Green - doesn't qualify for these age based stats because his birthday is in August.

Like, if Orlando version of Bradeaux did "best blah blah under 20.5, 21.5," it'd be pretty epic

 

lol never go full boxscore...this is the lowest of low...

high player good low player bad
high score good low score bad

 

Doesn't change the fact that it's being said, and makes the people claiming it's not look either ignorant or flat out full of bullshit.

 

The list had TS%, and Green was in the top half … with every player on the list an eventual all-star.

You can keep banging on usage rates and counting stats, but you are just ignoring facts.

 

Wtf u talking i got only this account. Why should someone do more then one account? Btw iam the only one here who doenst speak/write well english cause iam from germany everyone else is good at english.

 

do you have any Swedish cousins who are Hakeem Olajuwon fans? asking for a friend

 

If you want to start comparing era-adjusted true shooting percentage and Jalen Green with that list, please be my guest.

Here he is against Kobe at age 19, from earlier in the season:

Code:

<PRE>                                                                                                                                                                         
                                                                          Play                                     Leag                                                 Leag
Rk        Player  Season Age  G    MP   FG   2P   3P  eFG   FT   TS  FTr  3PAr   FG   2P   3P  eFG   FT   TS  FTr  3PAr  FG+ 2P+ 3P+ eFG+ FT+ TS+ FTr+   3PAr+ FG Add TS Add
1    Kobe Bryant 1997-98  19 79  2056 .428 .456 .341 .469 .794 .547 .500  .241 .451 .470 .346 .478 .737 .524 .330  .160   95  97  99   98 108 105  152     151  -15.9   53.4
2    Jalen Green 2022-23  20 27   932 .417 .482 .323 .483 .806 .537 .324  .407 .469 .542 .356 .538 .782 .575 .265  .388   89  89  91   90 103  93  122     105  -52.8  -41.2
</PRE>

Provided by <a href="https://www.sports-reference.com/sharing.html?utm_source=direct&utm_medium=Share&utm_campaign=ShareTool">Stathead.com</a>: <a href="https://stathead.com/basketball/pcm_finder.cgi?utm_source=direct&utm_medium=Share&utm_campaign=ShareTool">View Stathead Tool Used</a><br>Generated 12/15/2022.

 

Dont know what u mean but if u try to be funny u failed

 

don't haha me man

 

Do you think Shaq and Eddie Jones helped give Kobe easier looks?

Kobe also averaged far less pts for his career before 21. So if he expanded to Green's usage with no one at the caliber of a prime Shaq, do you think his ts% would drop?

 

Yes. But not in favor of kpj. get rid of them both

 

Are Edwards, Booker, LaMelo, Barrett a different era? Your entire argument was the list was era-specific and due to the increased usage of young players now. I point out his efficiency is still top half and you switch to “it’s a different era.”

You are either being intentionally obstinate or trolling for effect. I suspect the latter, and yet I fell for it. My mistake.

 

I have no idea, entirely different player in a different era.

I can just say that relative to his era he wasn't as inefficient as Green, and that Green is unlikely to match his achievements

 

So if it's a #2 pick curse, i guess we should go ahead and trade Green and the #2 pick if we don't get #1/Wemby. Scoot is a guaranteed bust at #2.

amirightoramiright?