1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Official] Texans Offseason

Discussion in 'Houston Texans' started by Castor27, Jan 8, 2023.

  1. cmoak1982

    cmoak1982 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    18,080
    Likes Received:
    22,623
    Talent? Both Bortles and Gabbert are far more talented physically than either Young or Stroud. Production is definitely in favor of those two
     
  2. Mr.Scarface

    Mr.Scarface Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    13,048
    Likes Received:
    8,352
    LOL. God, u are hopeless.
     
  3. cmoak1982

    cmoak1982 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    18,080
    Likes Received:
    22,623
    Literally no one would think Stroud or Young are more physically gifted than Bortles or Gabbert. They would be idiots.

    QB skills? That’s a different conversation. Young is elite compared to them. Stroud is not
     
    Sooty likes this.
  4. Sooty

    Sooty Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    2,288
    Likes Received:
    2,269
    Do you want to clarify what you just stated?

    I’m trying to be positive and all with the Demeco hire but WTAF?!
     
    cmoak1982 likes this.
  5. cmoak1982

    cmoak1982 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    18,080
    Likes Received:
    22,623
    Clarify?
    Gabbert and Bortles are more physically gifted than either Stroud or Young. That’s not even debatable.
    6’4/6’5 230+ 4.6 speed with big arms. Bortles is probably closer to Stroud but he probably has a bigger arm.

    Neither of them had good QB skills, that’s also not debatable. Young is a much more polished QB. I don’t think Stroud is but we will see

    Was it not clear that Young and Stroud had far more production?
     
    Sooty likes this.
  6. Sooty

    Sooty Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    2,288
    Likes Received:
    2,269
    Haha no you’re good, it read as though you said production was in favor of the two physically gifted players :)
     
    cmoak1982 likes this.
  7. cmoak1982

    cmoak1982 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    18,080
    Likes Received:
    22,623
    No lol, definitely not.
    I’m just saying physically they are prototypes.
    Still doesn’t mean much unless they have the actual skills needed mentally.
     
    Sooty likes this.
  8. STR8Thugg

    STR8Thugg STR8Thugg Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    6,869
    Likes Received:
    7,093
    Blaine Gabbert? Get the **** outta here. What a complete joke.

    Also, I'm not super high on stroud but to act like Gabbert and Bortles had much better QB skills than Stroud...I just don't agree with that.
     
  9. STR8Thugg

    STR8Thugg STR8Thugg Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    6,869
    Likes Received:
    7,093
    Blaine Gabbert did not have a big arm. It doesn't matter that he was 6'4 or 6'5. That's like saying Schaub had a big arm bc he's a big QB. Absolutely ridiculous. Gabbert didn't have a complete trash arm, but it's absurd to say he had a cannon.

    Blaine Gabbert was awful in college and even worse in the NFL, and for reasons I can't fathom Todd McShay thought he was going to be incredible.
     
  10. cmoak1982

    cmoak1982 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    18,080
    Likes Received:
    22,623
    No one said QB skills. Physical talent.
     
  11. cmoak1982

    cmoak1982 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    18,080
    Likes Received:
    22,623
    What?!
    Gabbert was known for having a very strong arm. Bortles was the one that didn’t have a cannon.

    Gabbert was Cam Newton with a stronger arm. Just no QB skills
     
  12. STR8Thugg

    STR8Thugg STR8Thugg Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    6,869
    Likes Received:
    7,093
    I just can't. Blaine Gabbert is a trigger for me. He's one of the worst QBs I've ever seen on an NFL field. I realize there were a lot of reasons that contributed to that, but it was blowing my mind he was even being considered as a first round prospect.

    Blake Bortles had solid physical skills, a B arm, you could see some of the physical talent. Gabbert? He was 6'4 and ran a 4.6 but played like 5'4 with a 5.2 40. He wasn't actually fast on the field, nor did his arm impress, either in accuracy or strength.
     
    cmoak1982 likes this.
  13. cmoak1982

    cmoak1982 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    18,080
    Likes Received:
    22,623
    I’m not saying Gabbert was good at all, but to deny that he had elite physical traits isn’t being honest. He was a total idiot, not accurate and couldn’t read a field to save his life. But he had elite size, mobility and top shelf arm
     
  14. STR8Thugg

    STR8Thugg STR8Thugg Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    6,869
    Likes Received:
    7,093
    Just to be clear, when you say "top shelf arm", you are saying Blaine Gabbert's arm strength is comparable to Josh Allen, Aaron Rodgers, Stafford, Herbert? Or are you just throwing out that term loosely?
     
  15. STR8Thugg

    STR8Thugg STR8Thugg Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    6,869
    Likes Received:
    7,093
    Dude... And I'm the one not being honest?
     
  16. cmoak1982

    cmoak1982 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    18,080
    Likes Received:
    22,623
    In terms of strength? It was up there. In terms of practical use? Not even close.

    Literally every scouting report you can find says great arm strength, top shelf arm, make every throw and fit into tight windows.
     
  17. cmoak1982

    cmoak1982 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    18,080
    Likes Received:
    22,623
    That’s what he was compared to, that size and athleticism.
    Not saying that it translated onto the field, but that was the scouting reports. He was supposed to be a perennial pro bowler
     
  18. STR8Thugg

    STR8Thugg STR8Thugg Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    6,869
    Likes Received:
    7,093
    There are scouting reports that say Travis Kelce is a bad route runner with stones for hands... that doesn't make it accurate. There are a ton of misevaluated players and reports on them.

    When they said Gabbert had a strong arm, they probably watched his pro day and got excited, but he never displayed an ability to push the ball down the field in college or in the NFL.

    I'm not saying he was Matt Schaub, but nothing about his arm strength stood out.
     
  19. cmoak1982

    cmoak1982 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    18,080
    Likes Received:
    22,623
    I can see that. His accuracy was more the problem than sheer power
     
  20. STR8Thugg

    STR8Thugg STR8Thugg Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    6,869
    Likes Received:
    7,093
    My point is that he had a normal NFL arm. It wasn't a noodle like Schaub or Pennington, but he wasn't firing lasers like some of the actual elite NFL arms, accuracy notwithstanding.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now