1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Official] Astros Off Season

Discussion in 'Houston Astros' started by Castor27, Nov 7, 2022.

  1. Bregatron

    Bregatron Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2021
    Messages:
    488
    Likes Received:
    971
    Well, since the Astros got their DH/LF, I guess it's time to argue about CF. When does the Maton vs. Martinez vs. Blanco vs. Taylor vs. Mushinki vs. free agent arguing begin? :confused:
     
  2. Wulaw Horn

    Wulaw Horn Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2018
    Messages:
    5,826
    Likes Received:
    7,073
    Begun, the Maton wars already have. I’m on team shoot him into the face of the sun and make sure it’s a pod built for 2 with Dubon also in it.
     
    IBTL, Phillyrocket, Radricky and 4 others like this.
  3. SWTsig

    SWTsig Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,053
    Likes Received:
    3,744
    My point is I'm questioning the insistence that Maldy deserves to be anything more than a backup catcher. I'm not disagreeing w Vazquez wanting to leave - I would have as well. I'm questioning the brain trusts unwavering loyalty to Maldonado when they had a demonstrably better option already on the team and willing to sign to a reasonable contract so long as he received the bulk of starts.

    And there isn't a "fascination" w Vazquez but there's obviously been a fascination within the organization of finding a better starting catcher - at least allegedly.

    Besides, an OPS+ 12 points higher isn't something to scoff at. Nor is a career slash line of .261/.310/.386 vs .209/.285/.349, never mind last years .274/.315/.399 vs Maldy's .186/.248/.352. Or that fact that Vazquez's OPS+ last year alone, even after a so-so tenure here, was 99 compared to Maldy's 69. Oh ya, since when is a postseason OPS of +116 not a "major" difference??? Never mind that Vazquez is 4 yrs younger.

    It's weird seeing so many on here routinely downplay or flat out denigrate the marked offensive advantage Vazquez brings to the table. Is he Contreras? Of course not. But he's also about 50% less expensive AAV and a significant upgrade offensively to Maldonado. You don't think having someone hitting .272 at the bottom of the order instead of .186 is a major difference? C'mon.
     
  4. Yordan The Great

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2019
    Messages:
    6,694
    Likes Received:
    9,275
    Well you're doing a disservice spouting out career numbers.

    Vazquez OPS+ from the start of 2019 until he was traded to the Astros was 99.

    Maldonado catching 119 games avg over the past 2 seasons, 63. Maldonado's bat is dying a quick death.

    That my friend is a HUGE difference.

    Plus what do we really have left with Maldonado? No way he will catch another 115-125 games this season. If our young backups aren't getting it done we will be forced to make a trade deadline move, potentially giving up prospects. And that will be an unforced error when you could have had the perfect solution at catcher for at minimum the next 3 seasons.
     
    #7144 Yordan The Great, Dec 19, 2022
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2022
  5. Yordan The Great

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2019
    Messages:
    6,694
    Likes Received:
    9,275
    I sure hope Dusty gets his GD head out of his ass regarding that very scenario. Just stupidity to ignore the numbers.
     
    Wulaw Horn and Tomstro like this.
  6. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    68,538
    Likes Received:
    32,018
    What was Vazquez's OPS+ with the Astros? The information I've seen says it was 68.

    I see no reason whatsoever to give 3/30 for that kind of production.....even if he had any interest on staying here, which he didn't.

    It's a much better use of money to go get someone like Tucker Barnhart to be used exclusively against right handers as an insurance policy for guys like Lee and Diaz in case they aren't ready this year.
     
    Nook likes this.
  7. Tomstro

    Tomstro Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2016
    Messages:
    25,751
    Likes Received:
    22,814
    Haha. These are ballplayers. Most aren’t rocket scientists.
     
  8. Tomstro

    Tomstro Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2016
    Messages:
    25,751
    Likes Received:
    22,814
    Nah. I’ve never seen him do something that Chas couldn’t do. Just look at the numbers over the last 2 years. Also, Meyers probably doesn’t make that catch against the phillies.
     
  9. Tomstro

    Tomstro Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2016
    Messages:
    25,751
    Likes Received:
    22,814
    What could this possibly mean?
     
  10. Tomstro

    Tomstro Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2016
    Messages:
    25,751
    Likes Received:
    22,814
    of course this makes 100% sense.
     
  11. Jeremy Williams

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2016
    Messages:
    1,166
    Likes Received:
    878
    I think yhr most heated with be Dusty’s lineups. :)
     
  12. Tomstro

    Tomstro Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2016
    Messages:
    25,751
    Likes Received:
    22,814
    his playing time once he joined the astros is a tiny sample size. The playing time he did get was sporadic so thats kinda tough on a player, to maintain his starter numbers with inconsistent playing time. I’ve seen you be really stubborn/obtuse in acknowledging this very obvious concept. Its basically like that in all sports. When your role changes drastically, especially going from starter to the bench, your numbers can change drastically. Even your percentages can change. Anyone who has watched and/or played sports for a few years would easily know this. I fail to really understand your disdain for Vazquez. I almost think it’s Down to 2 things..

    A. You never played sports and just started watching recently.
    B. Vazquez banged your girlfriend or wife.

    Since you are a member of a sports fan board, something a non sports fan wouldn’t be, it can’t be A.
     
  13. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    68,538
    Likes Received:
    32,018
    It wasn't THAT tiny, it was about 130 plate attempts, that's not massive, but it's a significant sample.

    Also, if he can only play well if he's an every day starter, he's a bad fit to begin with because that wasn't ever going to be in the cards.

    Vazquez is a weak hitting catcher on the wrong side of 30 yet you talk about him like he's Wilson Contreras....it's just weird.

    A mediocre backup quality catcher was never going to be a significant move by the Astros. The team already had him and he was too terrible at the plate to justify consistent playing time. I'm not sure why you simp for the guy so hard but throwing a 3 year deal at more than 10 mil a year for him would have been flat out stupid.
     
  14. Wulaw Horn

    Wulaw Horn Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2018
    Messages:
    5,826
    Likes Received:
    7,073
    I know. Which, if amongst that group you come off as enough of a moron for them to take note of it and comment on it I’m fascinated by how bad it must be.
     
  15. Wulaw Horn

    Wulaw Horn Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2018
    Messages:
    5,826
    Likes Received:
    7,073
    Chas hits wallscrapers. Those were big boy sized shots. I get how the FO could fall in love with a guy that can do that. It’s not like running into a pulled ball the way Eusebio used to do twice a year, it’s an order of magnitude more unique.
     
  16. IdStrosfan

    IdStrosfan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2021
    Messages:
    8,734
    Likes Received:
    10,983
    What some Astro fans simply don't get is that the Astros value qualities that simply can't be measured in a catcher.

    After 2021, Brett Strom said Maldy was the team's MVP.

    The only 2 reasons the Astros have been looking at catchers are because Maldy is older and a FA after this upcoming season and catcher is a position where nobody can catch more than 75% of the games without breaking down.

    Maldy needs help, but if it was possible they would start him 152 games - and think they won the lottery doing it.

    The decision makers in the Astros organization are the only ones that matter and they think Maldy is the best catcher in baseball. Period.

    Fans here may complain and post all kinds of reasons and options to replace him because they simply have no capacity to understand what he REALLY means to the team and none of the other catchers they suggest can carry Maldy's jock.
     
  17. Tomstro

    Tomstro Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2016
    Messages:
    25,751
    Likes Received:
    22,814
    Chas has had a few tape measure shots. Meyers does not hit it harder.
     
  18. Tomstro

    Tomstro Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2016
    Messages:
    25,751
    Likes Received:
    22,814
    Well I don’t think Kyle Tucker is joining MENSA anytime soon.
     
  19. Snake Diggit

    Snake Diggit Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2012
    Messages:
    14,826
    Likes Received:
    24,096
  20. mkahanek

    mkahanek Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2001
    Messages:
    3,301
    Likes Received:
    1,881

Share This Page