[Developing] Nancy Pelosi's husband violently beaten with hammer

I would like to see the actual posts and I would like to understand how posts were attributed to him. How would the Washington Post attribute your posts here to you? Did he post under his real name on 4chan?

 

So he isn't gay? Any updates?

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning

"Sealioning (also sea-lioning and sea lioning) is a type of trolling or harassment that consists of pursuing people with relentless requests for evidence, often tangential or previously addressed, while maintaining a pretense of civility and sincerity ("I'm just trying to have a debate"), and feigning ignorance of the subject matter."

 

If you have evidence their reporting was erroneous, please post it. The article states they reviewed all of the websites. They published the date it was registered to DePape. If you have proof anything in there was inaccurate, show it as others have done to the tweets that you've posted.

 

The quotes at the end of the article are supposedly from 4chan. Please answer my question - did he post there under his real name, and if not, how else would they be able to attribute 4chan posts to him?

 

did the Times endorse Trump in 2016?

 

Because an individual doesn't have to approve subscribers. It can be an automated system.

 

it's not a typical 1500 sq ft home:

 

Until you post a reason to doubt it, there is no reason to believe that after putting so much research in the rest of their article they would be negligent in that reporting.

So far you've shown zero reasons why we should doubt it. People have been able to show why the tweets you've posted were erroneous and misleading. You haven't posted any support of the idea that this article was wrong.

 

• So the current story is that the guy used the hammer to smash the glass door (the glass fell outside).
• Somehow he and Mr. Pelosi started engaging and talking to each other afterwards.
• The attacker allowed Mr. Pelosi to go to the bathroom.
• Mr. Pelosi called 911 from the bathroom, where his phone was charging and said there is a guy here who is a friend called David. Please come.
• Police eventually arrives. No violence in between? The door gets opened by a third person who was present.
• Somehow a hammer (or the hammer that was supposedly used to break the glass door?) ends up in Mr. Pelosi's hand.
• But when the police arrives, the guy takes the hammer away from Mr. Pelosi and brutally attacks him with it, fracturing the elderly gentleman's skull.
• Supposedly he also had zip ties with him and screamed "Where is Nancy".
• Later, he confessed that he wanted to kidnap Nancy Pelosi and if she wasn't going to say what he wanted, he would have wanted to break her kneecaps so she would have to be wheeled into congress.

Is this all correctly summarized, as far as we know?

 

My question is a simple common sense question - in the meantime, I googled 4chan and I don't see a single person there posting under their real name. I am trying to understand how the Washington Post could attribute 4chan posts to him. How would anyone attribute your posts here to your real name?

P.S.: Nobody has shown anything I posted to be erroneous and misleading. Nice try, teachers union boy.

 

You guys just look for ANYTHING you perceive as a weakness to try and argue to "own the libs" or whatever.

I was clearly talking about "US"... meaning all of us when we think about home security. Juxx was wondering about the security measures and I empathized with the notion that maybe LIKE ALOT OF US we rely on our technology, or get a false sense of security.

The Pelosi's are far from ALOT OF US. Why you would think that I would think that is weird, and not worth debating with you.

 

I JUST POSTED THE AFFIDAVID like 5 times which lays this out from the officers report. Read it for yourself, and if you still want to believe it is a false flag sex rink gay lover hammer kink fest go for it. Just realize that the more you continue to fight this like you are breaking down the Zapruter film, the nuttier you look.

 

He's just asking QeUsTiOnS

 

Their opinion columnist endorsed Hillary Clinton. Their higher ups and editors endorsed clicks, and making money which led them to cover the 2016 election in a way that favored Donald Trump by a longshot.

Their lead editors even admitted it:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/31/podcasts/the-daily/2020-election.html

Listen to them talk about it themselves. Their model in 2016 for business absolutely worked to Trump's benefit.

 

the NYT also pushed the bush administrations false narrative about yellow cake from niger...a story that was fed to them by cheney's office.

 

Did I write anything there that is incorrect?

 

I guess I was "just asking questions" about sex with farm animals too. Apparently that means getting sued so maybe Nancy Pelosi should be suing these posters for asking questions. Their reputations have alot more damage than an anonymous loser on the internet.

 

Ya I don't get why he was upset about that. We were just asking questions.

 

He's just asking questions.