[Developing] Nancy Pelosi's husband violently beaten with hammer

I think mentally ill people need help. This guy should not have been in society. That's a serious problem. "Woke' society are idiots but I an not blaming either side for this guy.

 

Is that why you continually wh0re yourself in the sub-section of a Rockets forum? lol pathetic "business man"...

 

Don't let the wokesters off the hook so easily.

They are trying to suppress anti-woke speech.

 

Just because it doesn't have a snapshot in the wayback machine prior to Friday does not mean it didn't exist before then.


From archive.org.

Why isn’t the site I’m looking for in the archive?

Some sites may not be included because the automated crawlers were unaware of their existence at the time of the crawl. It’s also possible that some sites were not archived because they were password protected, blocked by robots.txt, or otherwise inaccessible to our automated systems. Site owners might have also requested that their sites be excluded from the Wayback Machine.

 

Hey business men are their own bosses and create their own schedules. Don't act like you've never met a successful businessman who edgelords on a NBA team fan message board.

 

Yes, I am not buying the official story. It doesn't make sense. I'm far from a conspiracy person (exact opposite and you can check my history) but there's no way this idiot gets past security. Like I said, he couldn't get to me so how would he get to the Pelosi's? He's mentally ill and somehow managed to get around a security detail for an extremely powerful family?

There's quite a lot more.

 

Checked history. Definitely not a conspiracy person. A "I'll insult women for not giving birth" person but a conspiracy person?

Actually ya you do seem like a nutty conspiracy type of person. Never mind.

 

Even if that's the case what does it change when it's the call to action from right wing driven propaganda that inspires mentally ill people?? Even Bernie and AOC who are as far left as it gets, have never campaigned against their own party leaders in a way that insinuates violence against Democrats is an answer in order to magically then get them to pass Medicare for All or legalize weed or whatever.

You know who does do that though....

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/30/us/politics/pelosi-attack-republican-threats.html

Also.... The New York Times (not exactly a friend of the Democratic party) claims here that he was trafficking in right wing propaganda like Qanon. So if you think the NYT is lying then say that, but it's them saying it. Not just me.

Again... your crusade here to try and prove that he actually wasn't in a tribe and ideology that you are sooooo protective of for some reason is bizarre. You need to go to the gym, get some rest, and watch some mindless TV or something. Give. It. A. Rest. This isn't worth dying on a hill for.

The fact is for years the right has trafficked in propaganda that would likely inspire violence against Nancy Pelosi. That's just a fact dude. The Democratic party does not, and even though there are far left groups that call for activism to push Democrats on issues like M4A, NONE of them call for violence.

Give It Up.

 

The NYT is a communist rag

 

I don't have much consideration for your worthless opinion because I wouldn't hire you. Look at how you type. You have no self respect. Any worthwhile employer would laugh at you and whatever fake "resume " you presented

 

From the wayback machine...

https://web.archive.org/web/20221028174445/https://www.frenlyfrens.com/blog/categories/communism.

Look at the dates of the posts @AroundTheWorld

 

the NYTimes is not a friend to the Democratic Party?

pray, when was the last time the Times endorsed a Republican for president?

Spoiler

1956

 

I will admit to being surprised that they don't have private security.

 

Yes, I considered that possibility. Now, I have been using archive.org for over 20 years. And it would be the greatest coincidence of all time if archive.org had been "unaware of the site's existence" for years, supposedly, but on the day the guy commits a crime, suddenly it gets crawled. And that not only for one, but for both sites.

One thing I was considering is whether the first mentions of the guy's name in media reports could have triggered some algorithms which then led to an otherwise totally obscure site being crawled for the first time? I don't know. It just seems weird.

I would like to thank you (and I mean it), because you are the first person who is actually trying to figure this out yourself as well, rather than just quoting third party sources.

So I did also get this far, but then when I try to read the actual posts, it always says you need to subscribe first. And almost all of them say "0 views". So here I am, trying to understand how the Washington Post subscribed really quickly while that guy was in the hospital and presumably couldn't confirm subscribers and how they could confirm the content and the identity of the author when it supposedly has 0 views? And the stuff that is in the headlines seems like a randomly clipped collection of dumbass conspiracy **** - but it doesn't seem to align at all with the life the guy lived.

The blog seems to rail against this "You will own nothing and you will be happy" quote from the WEF. Well, this guy literally seems to have owned nothing. The people I have seen who get triggered by this "you will own nothing and you will be happy" quote are more like @MojoMan. I don't think they are super rich, but they also don't "own nothing". They are very eager to prevent that from happening.

All the stuff the guy seems to rail against is almost cliché-like what someone from the Left wants to portray a "right winger" as. The guy's life, as far as known, just doesn't fit.

With regard to the dates of the posts, some of the public commenters explained that with blog features where post dates could be backdated. Whether that is the case here, I don't know.

I never claimed to know for sure what has happened. I mostly think the circumstances with these two blogs are weird.

But once the guy appears in court, hopefully we find out more?

In any case, I hope that Mr. Pelosi recovers fully, and soon.

 

The NYT is a friend to one person, and one person only.... money. The NYT played a big part of putting Trump in the White House in 2016. They are no friends to the Democrats despite what Trump tells you when you go to his rallies or whatever you do. Part of the gamesmanship for Trump is to constantly badger so-called "middle of the road" outlets like the NYT and CNN so their staff even at some level work harder to prove that they are not shills for the Democrats... which leads to more Trump friendly content. What Trump and the GOP do in demonizing the NYT, CNN, and others works quite well actually.

 

So is Mr Pelosi gay or not? I'm so confused now.

 

I don't know and I don't care.

But yes, you are confused, and you have been for a long time. But I wish you well.

 

The article I linked goes into detail including specific dates.

 

We already know that since they opened the door.

 

I think many of the technological tools that we have now can give us a false sense of security. I also think guns are a false sense of security too. Many camera systems are too unresponsive, and the moment you see on your phone that there's someone outside, that person could already be in the house. Same with a gun where unless you sleep with a loaded gun strapped to your chest, you still couldn't react fast enough if someone got in your house. Especially if you live in a typical 3/2 1500 sq foot home where someone is within feet of your room the moment they enter the home.

The fact that the Pelosi's had a glass sliding door to begin with is problem #1 they had going against them. I don't want to spend anymore time going over every single detail of the Pelosi estate, but I do think it's important for us to think about when we pick out fixtures etc. that sliding glass doors or windows without security measures are not great for security. Whatever you can do to help yourself not have to resort to guns which has more risks than they are worth in a break in.