1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Trading 3 for 5 + 7

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Spacemoth, May 18, 2022.

?

Would you take picks 5 and 7 for #3 overall?

  1. Yes

    66 vote(s)
    34.6%
  2. No, let's take Banchero

    125 vote(s)
    65.4%
  1. TriumVirate

    TriumVirate Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2009
    Messages:
    3,728
    Likes Received:
    3,894
    Do we really want to take on more prospects? Jaygup and Sengun both need more minutes. I don't see EG and Wood being off this team until maybe trade deadline.
     
    peleincubus likes this.
  2. Joe Joe

    Joe Joe Go Stros!
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 1999
    Messages:
    26,289
    Likes Received:
    16,616
    More prospects, no. Better prospects (assuming #3 and #5 picks rated closely in value), yes. I'd guess the Rockets keep or trade up with #17 if they keep the #3 pick. If they have the #5 and #7 picks, they would likely make another trade such that they still end up with 2 picks at most.
     
  3. Mathloom

    Mathloom Shameless Optimist

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    21,014
    Likes Received:
    22,421
    No I don't think so, but we should make a move for Sacramento's #4 pick with a bunch of our assets. That's a great way to accelerate (end?) the rebuild.
     
    DreamR and Verbal Christ like this.
  4. FLAGRANT1

    FLAGRANT1 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2001
    Messages:
    1,348
    Likes Received:
    640
    Idk if alot of y'all are aware of this but Ivey is a 6'-4" guard. A GUARD!
    We have plenty of those in case y'all missed the games
     
  5. KingSamJack

    KingSamJack Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2013
    Messages:
    2,214
    Likes Received:
    2,653
    Kings want a player that can push them to playoffs/play in.
     
  6. Dr of Dunk

    Dr of Dunk Clutch Crew

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 1999
    Messages:
    46,612
    Likes Received:
    33,588
    That's part of the trade and the problem. You don't know if they'll both be there. So now do you make the trade? I mean, if you had a guarantee that players you wanted both would be there at 5 and 7, it makes it too easy. What if somebody drafts Murray at #4 or Mathurin at #6?
     
  7. peleincubus

    peleincubus Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    26,717
    Likes Received:
    14,997
    I’ve read this 3 times by the 3rd act I still don’t understand what you mean or you’re point. I’ve seen the movie too lol
     
  8. TriumVirate

    TriumVirate Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2009
    Messages:
    3,728
    Likes Received:
    3,894
    I'm not saying we should draft Ivey, but that thinking is what got Kings in the mess they are in. When you are rebuilding, you draft BPA. If Stone thinks Ivey is the BPA, then we should draft him.
     
  9. dmoneybangbang

    Joined:
    May 5, 2012
    Messages:
    22,530
    Likes Received:
    14,262
    It kinda turned into a psycho slasher movie, thought the turn was out of place in the movie.
     
    Milos likes this.
  10. Joe Joe

    Joe Joe Go Stros!
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 1999
    Messages:
    26,289
    Likes Received:
    16,616
    Sharpe and Paolo with 5th and 7th would be fine. Not best case, but would do that in a heartbeat over keeping the #3.
     
  11. peleincubus

    peleincubus Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    26,717
    Likes Received:
    14,997
    yeah... ive seen the movie. how does that relate to the rockets though lol
     
  12. Hemingway

    Hemingway Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2016
    Messages:
    10,632
    Likes Received:
    13,851
    I would do this if Jabari is gone. We would be in the playoffs next year and still set up for the future.
     
    rhee likes this.
  13. Aruba77

    Aruba77 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 1999
    Messages:
    15,285
    Likes Received:
    18,520
    I’d rather keep #3 and trade up from #17, or keep #3 and trade out of the draft pushing our 2nd pick to a future draft.
     
  14. dmoneybangbang

    Joined:
    May 5, 2012
    Messages:
    22,530
    Likes Received:
    14,262
    Lol. Oh. Because the OP referenced it at the end of their post.
     
  15. hakeem94

    hakeem94 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2016
    Messages:
    30,803
    Likes Received:
    41,420
    if i am miami heat with a dedicated leadership, culture and coach you absolutely do it...they do great things even with undrafted guys, mid teen and late FRPs......whether they get pick no 3, 5 or 7 is irrelevant...more is better...they know how to develop... in rockets case its hard to decide...
     
  16. peleincubus

    peleincubus Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    26,717
    Likes Received:
    14,997
    oh duhhhhh. i didnt see that at all. i was puzzled haha
     
    dmoneybangbang likes this.
  17. ClutchCityReturns

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    13,411
    Likes Received:
    2,643
    Murray and Mathurin are just best case scenario imo. I assume in your scenario that Ivey would be there at 5 and Duren at 7...maybe even reach on Williams given his combine measurements. I would rather have a combination of any of these guys and bet that at least one pans out vs putting my eggs all in one basket...unless that basket is Chet.
     
  18. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,556
    Likes Received:
    38,778
    Taking 2 shots at getting a superstar is not bad, but we already have a TON of young star hopeful players and we need to find out if they are it.....also if you have defined ONE player in this years draft and he falls to us, you take him.

    DD
     
  19. MystikArkitect

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2006
    Messages:
    14,093
    Likes Received:
    22,903
    Judging by what Stone said...he doesn't want Sharpe.
     
  20. dmenacela

    dmenacela Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2002
    Messages:
    2,532
    Likes Received:
    620
    No. This is like Morey’s approach assets over quality. Don’t over think it. Take the third pick
     

Share This Page