1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

NCAA Tournament Prospect Tracker

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by finsraider, Mar 17, 2022.

  1. jiggyfly

    jiggyfly Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2015
    Messages:
    21,011
    Likes Received:
    16,856
    The other 6'10 is not a C and Wood should have no bearing on whom the Rockets draft.

    Banchero is not a liability on defense, he is average at worst.

    I have no idea why you keep looking at Banchero as a rim protector, you are really reaching to tarnish the guy.
     
    red5rocket, Bo6 and Verbal Christ like this.
  2. ApacheWarrior

    ApacheWarrior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2017
    Messages:
    10,350
    Likes Received:
    13,301
    So would say both coach K and Popovich lost a step or two this past season. You may be over selling Duke.
     
  3. jiggyfly

    jiggyfly Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2015
    Messages:
    21,011
    Likes Received:
    16,856
    Banchero is a big wing stop trying to claim he is more of a C/PF nobody is looking for a big wing/PF to be a rim protector.

    Your fascination with rim protection is bonkers, and only because you like somebody else to be the pick.
     
    Bo6 and Verbal Christ like this.
  4. jiggyfly

    jiggyfly Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2015
    Messages:
    21,011
    Likes Received:
    16,856
    Anybody that claims Smith has the fewest holes in his game makes me think he is getting paid by Smiths agent, the complete lack of a dribble game is a HUGE hole.

    I think both Chet and Banchero have zero holes in their games, it's just all a matter of how they translate.

    I also have to think they do this for the retweets and shares because they know a lot of people really are enamored with Smiths potential he seems to be the fans favorite right after Holmgren.

    What exactly is a hole in Banchero's game? shooting the 3?
     
    Bo6, Ekiu and Verbal Christ like this.
  5. jiggyfly

    jiggyfly Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2015
    Messages:
    21,011
    Likes Received:
    16,856
    Wut?

    Sengun has more of a push shot, and Banchero has a classic shooting form.

    Both have very high level footwork, but Banchero's is more smooth and deliberate.

    It's becoming very evident you really don't know what the **** you are talking about.

    IQ is insanely better? The same guy who could not stop reaching on the perimeter and kept fouling?

    I love, love, love, Sengun but dude get a grip.
     
    #3265 jiggyfly, May 2, 2022
    Last edited: May 3, 2022
    Verbal Christ likes this.
  6. Verbal Christ

    Verbal Christ Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Messages:
    19,925
    Likes Received:
    31,269
    Most draft boards based in REALITY have Banchero no lower than 3rd ... here on Clutch Fans?? "ummmm i'd take him at 5 but no higher because TRUST ME BRO"

    :D
     
    jiggyfly, Bo6, Denovo and 2 others like this.
  7. Verbal Christ

    Verbal Christ Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Messages:
    19,925
    Likes Received:
    31,269
    Edit: OH NOOOOOOO - the latest NBADRAFTNET mock has Ivey at 1 and Chet at 4!!! The sky is falling the sky is falling!!! :D:D:D:D:D

    https://www.nbadraft.net/nba-mock-drafts/
     
  8. smoothie

    smoothie Jabari Jungle

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    20,716
    Likes Received:
    6,947
    yes we'll have to disagree. I don't think he'd be considered the top pick if he were in this draft... and I really like alpy.
     
  9. treyk3

    treyk3 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    8,803
    Likes Received:
    16,248
    Paolo's foot speed will make it difficult for him to be anything more than a replace level defender in a switching scheme. His intensity tends to ebb and flow where as the other two guys seem to be much more locked in.

    None of these top three guys are perfect and any one of them would be awesome in Houston. Just hope for a top 3 pick and from there worry about the nit picks. A lot of draft coverage is focused on positives because guess what? These guys have never had an NBA regimen. Any of these holes are theoretically patchable. They are prospects for now and there's a reason why they aren't perfect.
     
    cmoak1982 likes this.
  10. jiggyfly

    jiggyfly Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2015
    Messages:
    21,011
    Likes Received:
    16,856
    Foot speed is not a hole in his game like shooting or ball handling.

    Those other guys can be more locked in because they were not asked to do as much on offense as Banchero and we are talking about a 19-year-old kids, I don't see an intensity issue, especially looking at what he did in the NCAA.

    I do agree Houston would be lucky to have any of the 3 but that does not mean we need to start creating things to downgrade these prospects and ignoring some real deficiencies.

    I don't think Holmgren is going to great switching either, he has some real issues with flexibility and lateral quickness.
     
    red5rocket and Verbal Christ like this.
  11. cmoak1982

    cmoak1982 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    18,080
    Likes Received:
    22,623
    Paolo won’t be the top pick either.
    That’s the issue.
     
  12. cmoak1982

    cmoak1982 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    18,080
    Likes Received:
    22,623
    Who are you?

    Do you know what a good jump shot looks like? Alp natural shot has great form.

    Footwork it’s not even a discussion. Alp has far greater footwork inside. Paolo has better feet in the face up game.

    And yes, basketball IQ favors Sengun by far.

    All of this hostility coming from a guy that lies about players to try and validate his point. Man, you sure are pretty sad.
     
    Boii and clutchdabear like this.
  13. treyk3

    treyk3 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    8,803
    Likes Received:
    16,248
    Holmgren has high hips, which is a text book thing to point at as to say why he won't be able to cover the perimeter to his full capability. Holmgren's issue is less about flexibility and lateral quickness (his insane length covers both). His biggest issue, to me regarding being able to defend 1-5 is his stability. I believe once he strengthens that core, he will be as good as any 7 footer in the NBA at guarding the perimeter.

    The biggest secret to all of this is this is all arguing over something that A) we have no control of the where the pick lands b) we have no control of who the pick ends up being. People will continue to find issues in the guys they don't like because it bolsters their guy. In the end none of this has any weight.
     
  14. groovemachine

    groovemachine Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    3,113
    Likes Received:
    4,865
    Their mock has been like that for awhile. Ivey’s explosiveness is impressive, and particularly intriguing seeing Ja’s recent success. I’d be happy with Ivey on the team, our backcourt would be impossible to contain.
     
    jiggyfly, burlesk and Verbal Christ like this.
  15. Verbal Christ

    Verbal Christ Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Messages:
    19,925
    Likes Received:
    31,269
    Sure I could see it. (I dont think Stone takes Ivey at 1, but who knows?) Im just going to have fun with the personnel experts on here moving forward. The circular reasoning is just funny to me.
     
    groovemachine likes this.
  16. Dr of Dunk

    Dr of Dunk Clutch Crew

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 1999
    Messages:
    46,615
    Likes Received:
    33,598
    Their draft has been the most "unique" for a while. They still have Johnny Davis as a top-5 pick, Dyson Daniels hasn't cracked top-20, and *gasp* Shaedon Sharpe isn't even top-10 despite his 87" vertical. Blasphemers!
     
  17. peleincubus

    peleincubus Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    26,720
    Likes Received:
    15,000
    87’ vertical would be better.
     
    burlesk and D-rock like this.
  18. D-rock

    D-rock Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    40,743
    Likes Received:
    64,232
    So you want Banchero AND Dieng????

    You really hate defense amirite?

    Especially rim protection and dog mentality.
     
    Verbal Christ likes this.
  19. D-rock

    D-rock Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    40,743
    Likes Received:
    64,232
    Banchero at 6'10 255 is a 4 and small ball 5.

    And I've said often that Banchero is top 3, top 4 draft pick at worst.

    I'm really vicious in my hatred for the player, the tarnisment is almost as bad as insisting a 6'10 wing with elite shooting and a plus defender MUST have better handles to deserve a top 3 rating amirite?
     
  20. Corrosion

    Corrosion Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    10,029
    Likes Received:
    13,257

    I just don't see what some of you do with Sengun .... Yes, he's a rotation piece. No, he's not a foundation piece.


    Poor outside shooter
    Poor defender & Not a rim protector.
    High turnover rate
    Reaches far too much and ends up in foul trouble.

    Yes, I expect him to improve but even then, he's so limited physically that I feel like he will be overmatched in that department more often than not with opponents longer and more explosive.

    Yes, he makes some special plays offensively and he hustles his ass off ..... but the ceiling to me is Louis Scola. To me, that's a backup player on a good team.

    Stone took a swing and dropped in a base hit ..... he'll stick in the league a long time but I don't see superstar potential.

    I also disagree that no one else has that kinda upside.

    Josh Christopher has all the physical tools and the work ethic to be great on both ends of the court.
     

Share This Page