Psaki Says "Gender Affirming Care" for Kids Is 'Best Practice'

I know this is hard for a lot of conservative Christians to understand...but in most parts of the world, masturbation isn't view negatively and honestly children as little as 3 year olds masturbate spontaneously. It's only in our super repressed Puritanical culture do we punish children and teach them its bad to touch their own bodies and explore it.

 

The federalist... are they still reporting that old men like roy moore should be molesting girls in order to have more babies?

Conservative site gets major blowback after defending Moore dating teens ‘to raise a large family’

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/...owback-after-defending-moore-dating-teens-to/

 

It is vile to post anything from the hate-monger Libs of Tiktok.

Please look at the link already posted exposing what they are.

 

Libs of Tiktok is driven by hate and bigotry. I'm still slightly depressed having seen the millions of posts from that site all with the sole purpose of hate.

She should be allowed to spew her hate. But no decent person should post it or support it.

 

this seems overly strong. "hate-monger"? and why the desire to censor/cancel a posting from LibsofTikTok rather than discuss a specific post?

 

our posts crossed in the ether. I'm not sure I agree with you here, but I also am not a regular consumer of Libsoftiktok, which you clearly must be to have formed such a strong opinion

 

So they say Democrats are pedophiles, but defend the real pedophiles in their party. Guess it's the GOP tactic of projecting off themselves as usual.

 

I never suggested censoring. I suggested common decency. I said she should be allowed to post her hatred.

Did you read her Twitter feed? Hate-monger is generous.

 

everything I've ever seen from the site is simply videos of self-proclaimed liberals who have filmed themselves.

and I disagree with your statement "I never suggested censoring." You are suggesting that anyone who posts "vile" stuff from the site is also "vile" and is a hate-monger as well by association. You are (seemingly) attempting to bully posters here into not posting links to that site. That is a type of or desire for censorship. You hope your values prevail, and that other posters' values are rejected in favor of your values--without discussion.

So yes, I'd call that censorious.

 

Actually I only had a mild dislike to it until a post in this thread linked a whole endless barrage of bigoted hateful posts. After reading that, I was repulsed.

 

fair enough. I'm trying to watch two basketball games and only dipping into this forum during commercial breaks. I probably reacted too strongly

 

No problem. I'm watching only one and the Astros game.

 

Well, as mentioned before, this account attacks LGBTQ+ teachers and brags when/if it gets them fired. It does more than just 'post' the tiktoks, sometimes the account user even specifies where the person works. It's a very targeted harassment campaign and most of their targets are gay people.

I'll be asking @JumpMan and @AroundTheWorld as well as you if you agree with that, agreeing with having teachers harassed because they are gay because that's what this account does.

There are multiple times where libsoftiktok would simply post someone expressing their sexuality and going "This is mental illness"

As for this sexy sex ed...yes...well, it's funny that she's talking about context since she failed to reveal that sexy summer camp was for HIGH SCHOOL students 16 and up and was a VIRTUAL seminar.

https://www.sexysexed.org/

So...if libsoftiktok were honest they would have revealed that the 'sexy summer camp' was virtual and for high school students...

 

This.

Boohoo when the right wing harassers get harassed back and then resort to the victim card. I wouldn't hold your breath waiting for those posters..... they support harassment.

 

100% if you support this account you support harassment.

I know the argument is "But Taylor Lorenz..." I pointed this out about Libsoftiktok before this became a national story. This is what they do and have been doing for quite some time now. When they made victims of people they, IMO, lost their 'right' to remain anonymous. Because of libsoftiktok people were harassed and lost jobs and every time they did she bragged and boasted about it. Now that someone is doing this to her she wants to cry foul.

As for this whole "She just posts...she doesn't hate..."



LIterally going after a suicide prevention hotline, and for what? A cartoon about how if you need support you can call them for it? She don't give a **** about kids if they aren't straight.

 

Not a problem.

The much bigger problem is that you are posting messages from someone who called suicide prevention grooming.

 

I would not agree with teachers being harassed just because they are gay.

But, you have to show me the receipts. I won't take your word for it.

Receipts.

Do you agree that teaching masturbation to children of ALL AGES, direct quote from her, as soon as they could talk, another direct quote from her, the language for their bodies so they know how to explore their body consensually (consent from a toddler?), more direct quotes from her, is correct?

So, the camp is for 16-year-olds, fine, but the lady is not talking about 16-year-olds in that video. She's talking about toddlers.

Do you agree with her?

So, I don't know if the video posted in this thread is the only commentary ilbsoftiktok has made on this video, but if it is, it's not technically dishonest. This is what the text above the video says:

"This woman is running a “sexy summer camp” for children in Kentucky. She says she think it’s good for toddlers to masturbate."

Does that woman run a "sexy summer camp" for children in Kentucky? Yes. Children 16 and up, but still children. Does that woman think it's good for toddlers to masturbate? Yes.

 

Hard to do since she's deleting her tweets...but look for a page back...this reply from a conservative...


He was replying to this tweet...you can't see the video since again..she deleted the tweet...


I can't get receipts for anything this woman literally deleted thousands of tweets, you should wonder why...

But here are some of her doxxing people...


There are tons of tweets like this, I won't waste time providing them.

No, I don't, because that's not what she said. She didn't said that she teaches children to masturbate, she didn't even get close to saying it. She said children should learn about their body parts so that they should know what not to do in public. She bought up a quick example as to how touching your nose is different from your penis. All she said about masturbation is that children touch themselves.

It wasn't even a direct quote from her, that's what you interpreted.

Do you really think that's honest? Be real now. Do you think she just by coincidence left out that this camp was for 16 year olds? Why not say teens and why say children?

 

If she is deleting them, then it's safe to say she did something wrong. That is sus.

Clutchfans is the only place I get my news so...

If there are tons, I'm sure someone will post them if you don't. So far, the ones I have seen posted are difficult to defend and haven't been for the most part.

She said, "we teach them" about their body parts like their nose.. she didn't go on to sing head, shoulders, knees, and toes.

She said that she recommends masturbation to people of all ages, ALL AGES. And that as soon as her nephews could talk, they were doing that, that as in masturbation.

She said, "tugging at their penis" while making a wanking motion and there was a splash animation added. And she said it feels good so we have to learn how to talk to young people about their bodies so that they're not exploring their bodies in public.

So, she didn't just say that children touch themselves. Use the language she used if there's nothing wrong with it.

I won't say that my interpretation of what she said can't be wrong, but yours is if you think she doesn't have some twisted thoughts on masturbation and kids. @Sweet Lou 4 2 defends the sentiment I caught from the video, you pretend it's not there.

it's not dishonest. Disingenuous? Maybe. Some other word not in my vocabulary? Probably.

You described the 16-year-olds as students, not teens. Why didn't you say teens?

What about her other statement? Does she believe it's good for toddlers to masturate? She makes it clear that she does.