Hunter Biden Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad

is there another book? I'm not aware of it

 

not exactly sure how that affects her reporting in October 2020 several weeks before the election?

 

I question her credibility.

She has a history of dubious claims and positions.

Do I completely dismiss the possibility claimed? No I don't, but I am not going to take her word for it. Further, even if the information on the hard drive is accurate, I don't think it proves what some think it does.

 

I like how these involve "either" Hunter or Joe Biden. And this according to catherine herridge and chuck grassley. If they were involving Joe Biden... then say that. My guess they involve Hunter.

 

If she was "impeccable" she would have remembered she already reported on this... that it was supposedly related to Hunter Biden's dealings with a Chinese company that happened a year after Joe Biden left the office of vice president.

But she implicates either Hunter or James in this tweet.

https://www.live5news.com/2022/03/31/white-house-responds-trump-call-information-bidens-son/

 

Jesus after all this country put up with in the GRIFTING TRUMP FAMILY CIRCUS - where they sold access in CHINA directly to the President.

DD

 

@basso predicted the future
wow

are we getting Chet or Banchero?
@Os Trigonum

 

the good news is no one here is planning on voting for Hunter Biden

 

I have no problem with investigating Hunter Biden. Just because the Trump family did a lot of stuff doesn't mean that the Biden family should be excused. If there is clear evidence that Hunter Biden broke the law he should be prosecuted.

That said I've yet to see anything that would directly implicate Joe Biden. Unlike with the Trump family where there was a pattern of government actions that benefited that family's business interests.

 

It just shows how fake their concerns are with everything including the hive controlling Mainstream Media.

 

Russia Russia Russia

Hunter Hunter Hunter

 

Does this help sway you?

 

The strategy saved Biden's ass but killed a bunch of Ukranians.

 

this didn't age well

 

https://spectatorworld.com/topic/look-out-next-hunter-biden-laptop-story/

excerpt:

. . . as the New York Post broke the story that a laptop full of Hunter Biden’s files indicated a potential pay-for-play scenario involving then-candidate Joe Biden just ahead of the 2020 presidential election, almost in real time more than 50 former senior intelligence officials signed a letter claiming the emails “have all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.” The signers said their national security experience made them “deeply suspicious the Russian government played a significant role in this case. If we are right this is Russia trying to influence how Americans vote in this election, and we believe strongly that Americans need to be aware of this.”

The letter played off prejudices from 2016 that the Russians manipulated an American election. In fact, most of the letter’s signatories — James Clapper and John Brennan among them — had played key roles in misdirecting public opinion around the DNC server hack and later the whole of Russiagate. In the hands of the mainstream media, the meme quickly morphed into “the laptop is fake, ignore it.” Twitter and Facebook quickly banned all mentions of the laptop, and the story disappeared in the mainstream media. Until now.

During my twenty-four-year State Department career, I was exposed to foreign disinformation, and as a journalist today, I read the Hunter Biden emails. There is no way experienced intelligence officers could have mistaken the contents of the Biden laptop for fake, produced material.

The most glaring reason is that most of the important emails could be verified by simply contacting the recipient and asking him if the message was real. Disinfo at this level of sophistication would never be so simple to disprove.

In addition, the laptop contents were about 80 percent garbage and maybe 20 percent useful (dirty) information, a huge waste of time if you are trying to move your adversary to act in a certain way. Such an overbearing amount of non-actionable material also risks burying the good stuff, and if this is disinfo you want your adversary to find the good stuff. It is also expensive to produce information that has no take attached to it, and fake info of any kind is at risk of discovery, blowing the whole operation. Lastly, nothing on the laptop was a smoking gun. You need the disinfo to lead fairly directly to some sort of actionable conclusion, a smoking gun, or your cleverness will be wasted.
​

more at the link

 

I'm surprised you are so interested in this story, given that you aren't voting for Biden anyway...

https://bbs.clutchfans.net/threads/...llion-bribe-from-saudis.315471/#post-14045466