That I agree with. He's the leader of the dimwits. The dumbest of the dumb. It's really crazy just how intellectually void his followers are. They don't realize they're in a cult, even while they're buying their flags, trumpybears, coins, etc. It's only considered republican because that's where a majority of these people sided, even mostly against their own interests. I say let him back on, too. I don't see the point in keeping him off twitter at this stage. He's clearly losing touch with reality more and more by the day. Let's see it happen in real time.
Plenty of his false claims dealt with how he won the election. Do you believe those tweets were true or were they false?
wait a second. You are a trump supporter? I mean, I don’t agree with your views, but I thought you were far too high brow and intellectual to support someone with such low class and IQ.
[Educational Post] Thought leaders such as myself in the absolute tippy-top level of intelligence can look past all the noise and see what Trump is doing to restore democracy and deliver power back to the people and away from the entrenched unelected class of bureaucrats that believe they run the country. Those who have flourished in leadership roles understand that hurtful truths are far more beneficial for people's lives than are soothing lies. I believe that the government should work for the people and not the other way around. I am anti-coercion at every level -- especially from the government -- locking down people during COVID was the most awful abuse of government power I have ever seen. My support of Trump is grounded in an unwavering belief in democracy, support for limited government, freedom for individuals, self-determination, peace through strength, and the unfettered pursuit of happiness for all. Supporting democrats is supporting government intrusion in our lives, high taxes which enslave us, paternalistic nanny-state policies, coercion to shape our behaviors, and living in a society where the government tells your what you can and can't do... and has a monopoly on violence which they'll use to enforce their abusive powers. GOOD DAY
A party that stands with and supports Trump, who praises Putin as a tough cookie who has great charm, speaks milestones. There is nothing charming about a leader so evil that he has dissenters poisoned, and has his soldiers committing horrific war crimes as we speak. Make no mistake about that. To call a man like Putin charming says a lot about Trump's psychopathic mind. Even now, Trump continues to praise Putin’s ‘intelligence’ Common sense suggests that Donald Trump should curtail his praise for Vladimir Putin, but the Republican just can’t seem to help himself. April 1: Trump pointed to the duration of Putin’s dictatorship as proof that the Russian is “obviously” intelligent. March 26: At a political rally, Trump told a supportive crowd that Putin is “smart,” and his aggression toward Ukraine “looked like a great negotiation." March 10: Fox News’ Sean Hannity all but begged the former president to criticize Putin, but he wouldn’t. “I got along with Putin,” Trump said. Feb. 26: Trump appeared at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), reiterated his belief that Putin is “smart,” and denounced his own country’s leaders as “so dumb.” Feb. 23: Trump issued a written statement touting Putin and admonishing his own country’s president. Feb. 22: Trump described Putin’s aggression toward Ukraine as “genius” and “very savvy,” adding, in reference to the Russian military, “They’re gonna keep peace all right.” Trump went on to praise Putin as “a tough cookie” who has “great charm.” https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow...ontinues-praise-putins-intelligence-rcna22866 If you stand with Trump you stand with Putin, so I urge you to rethink what type leader you want as the next President of this country.
Yes. And nothing you or any of the corrupt establishment globalist clan say to the contrary can or should be trusted on the topic.
There is a lot to unpack here, but my takeaway is that while I may need to reconsider my prior assessment of your highbrow intellectual prowess, I have can firmly conclude that you are an Olympic level mental gymnast. But the question that now burns is how does a mental gymnast and intellectual, might we say a renaissance conservative, like yourself deal with the q anon and Trumpy low IQ types in your midst? Do you offer nose breathing classes to the masses on Monday Wednesday and Friday? Or bleach is for clothes, not for mouths on tuesdays and Thursdays?
Twitter is riddled with scammers and does very little to prevent it. But somehow that is not a big issue to some. As long as certain people never return.
That still doesn't explain how restoring Trump to the platform or even fundamentally changing the ToS regarding online behavior can be monetized by the company. Musk, as much as I hate him, is a very smart and capable guy. I'm sure he'll be a positive for twitter's shareholders. But I don't see how he or twitter need Trump to help get them there.
The scammers didn't try to overthrow the US government, so there's that. They also don't get little blue check marks.
[Premium Post] It is a pity that not everyone who I share values with can be as intelligent as I am. The thought process that others use to arrive at the same destination is of interest to me, but not something I spend too much time thinking about. The key is that they got there, and for that I congratulate them. The Democratic party coalition relies heavily on inner city voters who unfortunately have high crime rates, poor family structures, awful schools, and struggle to provide for themselves. As a result, they must rely on the government for their survival. This is the voter base that Democrats must come to grips with aligning with. People who are not self-sufficient. It would be embarrassing to be on that team, quite frankly. GOOD DAY
traderjorge/mojoman isnt stupid. he knows that biden legitimately won the election in 2020. but he is a republican above all else so he will tow the party line.
[Premium Post] I think the liberals and Democrats think Trump won. Otherwise, they wouldn't be pushing so hard to avoid the election audits and to label it as a conspiracy theory. The liberals' playbook is pretty obvious as this point. They try to control the narrative through their control over the media and Big Tech... and they repress stories that hurt them. They come up with labels like "Jan 6", "Charlottesville", "Birthers", the "Big Lie" to help their marketing efforts to make normies think that their political opponents are crazy. It's called gaslighting. It's also the standard playbook of the intel agencies and the media. It's literally what they've done around the world for decades. The average American used to eat it up and think they were smart, but that's changing fast as the veil is lifted and people can access more and better information from different places. Obviously when you objectively analyze the 2020 results, you see fraud. Ballot harvesting, loss of chain of custody of ballots, lies about why voting was stopped in major cities in swing states on election night, attempts to prevent poll watchers from watching the counting, etc. There is more than enough evidence to support a thorough review of the 2020 election... something that liberals have put their full force into avoiding. That is very telling. It's how guilty people behave, quite honestly. I'll withhold my answer until we get to the bottom of what happened on election night and the days following. But definitely one potential outcome was a Trump win. It depends on what we learn. I expect action on this from the House Republicans once they regain control. GOOD DAY
So.. even though every single audit that the Trump campaign asked for shows absolutely zero widespread voter fraud, including those states (e.g. Arizona and Georgia) that are run by Republicans and did a number of recounts including by hand and including by the Republican partisan "cyber ninjas", you believe the possibility still exists that there was enough fraud to hand Trump the election?
[Premium Post] You are completely wrong. And nice try with the "widespread" qualifier -- which by the way is an implicit admission that there existed voter fraud. The problems were: A) unmonitored drop boxes; B) which were fed by illegally harvested ballots, and C) ballots where the chain of custody was broken. These ballots ALONE exceed the margin of victory in pivotal swing states. If you are mature enough to acknowledge that these issues existed, then I'd be happy to have a conversation with you. Even though I find it boring and unchallenging. GOOD DAY
